TDC (TDC)

$2.4B
Market Cap
19.1
P/E Ratio
0.62
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.85 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics present a distinct dichotomy between robust capital efficiency and deteriorating top-line momentum. An ROIC of 18.6% suggests the company generates returns significantly above typical cost of capital, supported by strong operating leverage evidenced by gross margins near 59.4%. This profitability is further validated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.85, indicating high financial quality with low probability of manipulation; however, the DuPont decomposition reveals that this return relies heavily on margin expansion rather than asset turnover or leverage, as revenue growth has contracted by 5.0% year-over-year. This divergence between shrinking sales and stable margins implies a potential shift in product mix or pricing power that must be weighed against the declining top line.

Valuation metrics reflect market skepticism regarding future growth despite current profitability. Trading at a P/E multiple of 19.1x, the stock commands a premium relative to its negative revenue trajectory but remains below levels typically associated with high-growth tech sectors where such margin profiles are common. A DCF analysis places fair value at $33, implying that the market currently prices in growth rates inconsistent with the observed -5.0% contraction or assumes future recovery scenarios not yet reflected in current earnings multiples. The discrepancy between the implied valuation anchor and the shrinking revenue base suggests investors may be discounting near-term headwinds while betting on a mean reversion in sales volume to sustain these elevated margins.

No risk factor deltas, insider activity data, or Fama-French alpha metrics were provided for this analysis; consequently, the risk/reward profile rests entirely on whether the margin expansion can offset persistent revenue declines and if the market's valuation assumptions regarding future growth align with operational reality.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$39$30$24
3%$45$33$26
4%$54$36$28

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $33 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.85
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

59.4%
Gross Margin
7.8%
Net Margin
18.6%
ROIC
-5.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+14.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
285.0M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

6.73x
Debt / Equity
0.92x
Current Ratio
7.8x
Interest Coverage
-0.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
294.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.56
Act: $0.66
+17.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.47
+16.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.54
Act: $0.72
+34.3%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.56
Act: $0.74
+33.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
10.35
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$41.78
52W High
$19.71
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$99M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TDC
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$206B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TDC shares regardless of TDC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $99M of passive capital is structurally linked to TDC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TDC's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in TDC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TDC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TDCEpicenterVGTETFVONGETFSPSMETF939UnknownWTGXXUnknown1398Unknown2454UnknownSMTCUnknown
TDC Price Drop (%)0

If TDC (TDC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies China Construction Bank Corp (939) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TDC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TDC Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
TDC

Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TDC Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does TDC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$285M
EBITDA
$294M
FCF Conversion
97%
Reinvestment Rate
3%
97% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

TDC converts 97% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-112,966$31.59$93,695.94
2026-05-0799,260$30.28$3.0M
2026-05-06467$30.08$14,047.36
2026-04-277,079$26.43$187,097.97
2026-03-1845$27.24$1,225.8
2026-03-17460$26.67$12,268.2
2026-03-127$27.29$191.03
2026-03-0320,525$30.41$624,165.25
2026-03-02456$31.49$14,359.44
2026-02-2514,371$30.03$431,561.13
2026-02-2016,529$32.12$530,911.48
2026-02-1924,021$32.81$788,129.01
2026-02-17899$33.56$30,170.44
2026-01-291$29.69$29.69
2026-01-2316,869$29.91$504,551.79
2026-01-12297$31.76$9,432.72
2026-01-08126$31.46$3,963.96
2025-12-191,499$29.86$44,760.14
2025-12-112,132$31.66$67,499.12
2025-12-0186$28.64$2,463.04
2025-11-071,078$28.30$30,507.4
2025-11-0324$20.85$500.4

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare TDC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.