TDC (TDC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a distinct dichotomy between robust capital efficiency and deteriorating top-line momentum. An ROIC of 18.6% suggests the company generates returns significantly above typical cost of capital, supported by strong operating leverage evidenced by gross margins near 59.4%. This profitability is further validated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.85, indicating high financial quality with low probability of manipulation; however, the DuPont decomposition reveals that this return relies heavily on margin expansion rather than asset turnover or leverage, as revenue growth has contracted by 5.0% year-over-year. This divergence between shrinking sales and stable margins implies a potential shift in product mix or pricing power that must be weighed against the declining top line.
Valuation metrics reflect market skepticism regarding future growth despite current profitability. Trading at a P/E multiple of 19.1x, the stock commands a premium relative to its negative revenue trajectory but remains below levels typically associated with high-growth tech sectors where such margin profiles are common. A DCF analysis places fair value at $33, implying that the market currently prices in growth rates inconsistent with the observed -5.0% contraction or assumes future recovery scenarios not yet reflected in current earnings multiples. The discrepancy between the implied valuation anchor and the shrinking revenue base suggests investors may be discounting near-term headwinds while betting on a mean reversion in sales volume to sustain these elevated margins.
No risk factor deltas, insider activity data, or Fama-French alpha metrics were provided for this analysis; consequently, the risk/reward profile rests entirely on whether the margin expansion can offset persistent revenue declines and if the market's valuation assumptions regarding future growth align with operational reality.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $39 | $30 | $24 |
| 3% | $45 | $33 | $26 |
| 4% | $54 | $36 | $28 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $33 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TDC shares regardless of TDC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $99M of passive capital is structurally linked to TDC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TDC's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in TDC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If TDC (TDC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies China Construction Bank Corp (939) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TDC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TDC Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest TDC Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TDC Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does TDC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
TDC converts 97% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 2,966 | $31.59 | $93,695.94 |
| 2026-05-07 | 99,260 | $30.28 | $3.0M |
| 2026-05-06 | 467 | $30.08 | $14,047.36 |
| 2026-04-27 | 7,079 | $26.43 | $187,097.97 |
| 2026-03-18 | 45 | $27.24 | $1,225.8 |
| 2026-03-17 | 460 | $26.67 | $12,268.2 |
| 2026-03-12 | 7 | $27.29 | $191.03 |
| 2026-03-03 | 20,525 | $30.41 | $624,165.25 |
| 2026-03-02 | 456 | $31.49 | $14,359.44 |
| 2026-02-25 | 14,371 | $30.03 | $431,561.13 |
| 2026-02-20 | 16,529 | $32.12 | $530,911.48 |
| 2026-02-19 | 24,021 | $32.81 | $788,129.01 |
| 2026-02-17 | 899 | $33.56 | $30,170.44 |
| 2026-01-29 | 1 | $29.69 | $29.69 |
| 2026-01-23 | 16,869 | $29.91 | $504,551.79 |
| 2026-01-12 | 297 | $31.76 | $9,432.72 |
| 2026-01-08 | 126 | $31.46 | $3,963.96 |
| 2025-12-19 | 1,499 | $29.86 | $44,760.14 |
| 2025-12-11 | 2,132 | $31.66 | $67,499.12 |
| 2025-12-01 | 86 | $28.64 | $2,463.04 |
| 2025-11-07 | 1,078 | $28.30 | $30,507.4 |
| 2025-11-03 | 24 | $20.85 | $500.4 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare TDC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.