TEX (TEX)

$6.3B
Market Cap
16.5
P/E Ratio
1.61
Beta
1.20%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 2.9 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.58 CleanROIC−WACC -4.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of TEX exhibit a modest ROIC-WACC spread, driven primarily by operational leverage rather than margin expansion or asset efficiency. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 10.5% return on equity is underpinned significantly by an equity multiplier of 2.93x, indicating reliance on financial leverage to boost returns while net margins remain compressed at 4.1%. Despite a decent Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggesting stable fundamentals and limited earnings manipulation risk per the Beneish M-Score of -2.58, the trajectory shows incremental revenue growth of only 5.7% year-over-yo, constraining long-term value creation potential relative to high-growth peers.

Valuation metrics suggest a market consensus that aligns closely with intrinsic valuation models but leaves limited margin for error regarding future execution. The current P/E ratio of 16.5x sits near historical averages and sector norms, implying the market is pricing in moderate growth expectations rather than a turnaround or acceleration narrative. This assessment is reinforced by the DCF fair value calculation of $86, which suggests that under base-case assumptions with implied growth rates matching recent performance, the stock trades at roughly its intrinsic worth, offering neither a significant discount nor a premium.

Risk factors present a mixed signal regarding ownership dynamics and factor exposure. While insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling totaling $829,495, which can sometimes indicate reduced confidence in near-term prospects or portfolio rebalancing by executives, this must be weighed against the company's solid financial health indicators like the low Beneish score. The combination of moderate growth, leveraged capital structure, and recent insider outflows creates a scenario where downside protection is reasonable but upside catalysts remain ambiguous absent further margin improvement or accelerated revenue expansion.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →9.5%11.5%13.5%
2%$106$77$58
3%$122$86$64
4%$144$98$71

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $86 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.9
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.58
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

19.4%
Gross Margin
4.1%
Net Margin
7.5%
ROIC
11.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.0%— Negative spread.
+5.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-34.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
322.0M
Free Cash Flow
14%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

4.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.88x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.93x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
10.5%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.93x
Debt / Equity
2.30x
Current Ratio
2.6x
Interest Coverage
2.9x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.99%
FCF Yield
627.0M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-829,495
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-13MEESTER SIMONSold 1/8 qtrsGrant105,200 shares
2026-03-13LADUE JOSEPHGrant2,340 shares
2026-03-13GROSS JOSHUASold 1/8 qtrsGrant17,674 shares
2026-03-13CARROLL PATRICK SGrant18,516 shares
2026-03-13KONG PICARELLO JENNIFERGrant26,932 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.57
Act: $0.83
+44.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.39
Act: $1.49
+7.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.21
Act: $1.50
+24.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.11
Act: $1.12
+1.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.71
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$71.50
52W High
$31.53
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$479M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TEX
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$482B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or VTWO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TEX shares regardless of TEX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $479M of passive capital is structurally linked to TEX through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TEX's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in TEX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TEX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TEXEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFBELow RiskRSLow RiskUSFDLow RiskSNXMed RiskWCCLow Risk
TEX Price Drop (%)0

If TEX (TEX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TEX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TEX Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
TEX

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TEX Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does TEX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$322M
EBITDA
$627M
FCF Conversion
51%
Reinvestment Rate
49%
51% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.0%

TEX converts 51% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1327,429$63.92$1.8M
2026-05-1280$64.13$5,130.4
2026-05-0894,453$62.82$5.9M
2026-04-309$60.70$546.3
2026-04-27383$62.59$23,971.97
2026-04-212,150$62.09$133,493.5
2026-04-10192$64.39$12,362.88
2026-04-02479$60.28$28,874.12
2026-03-25108$60.62$6,546.96
2026-03-176,240$59.38$370,531.2
2026-03-121,547$62.55$96,764.85
2026-03-06141$65.66$9,258.06
2026-02-2627$68.19$1,841.13
2026-02-232,000$68.17$136,340
2026-02-1942,394$69.06$2.9M
2026-02-0642$61.26$2,572.92
2026-02-054$64.25$257
2026-02-0410,194$63.17$643,954.98
2026-02-0373,757$58.99$4.4M
2026-02-0227$57.00$1,539
2026-01-3025,743$57.68$1.5M
2026-01-021,090$53.38$58,184.2
2025-12-22325$53.95$17,533.75
2025-12-1896$52.28$5,018.88
2025-12-05345$50.28$17,346.6
2025-11-2112,396$41.78$517,904.88
2025-11-2035,474$43.42$1.5M
2025-11-187,446$44.01$327,698.46
2025-11-05914$46.97$42,930.58
2025-10-31223$47.19$10,523.37

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare TEX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.