TEX (TEX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of TEX exhibit a modest ROIC-WACC spread, driven primarily by operational leverage rather than margin expansion or asset efficiency. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 10.5% return on equity is underpinned significantly by an equity multiplier of 2.93x, indicating reliance on financial leverage to boost returns while net margins remain compressed at 4.1%. Despite a decent Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggesting stable fundamentals and limited earnings manipulation risk per the Beneish M-Score of -2.58, the trajectory shows incremental revenue growth of only 5.7% year-over-yo, constraining long-term value creation potential relative to high-growth peers.
Valuation metrics suggest a market consensus that aligns closely with intrinsic valuation models but leaves limited margin for error regarding future execution. The current P/E ratio of 16.5x sits near historical averages and sector norms, implying the market is pricing in moderate growth expectations rather than a turnaround or acceleration narrative. This assessment is reinforced by the DCF fair value calculation of $86, which suggests that under base-case assumptions with implied growth rates matching recent performance, the stock trades at roughly its intrinsic worth, offering neither a significant discount nor a premium.
Risk factors present a mixed signal regarding ownership dynamics and factor exposure. While insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling totaling $829,495, which can sometimes indicate reduced confidence in near-term prospects or portfolio rebalancing by executives, this must be weighed against the company's solid financial health indicators like the low Beneish score. The combination of moderate growth, leveraged capital structure, and recent insider outflows creates a scenario where downside protection is reasonable but upside catalysts remain ambiguous absent further margin improvement or accelerated revenue expansion.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.5% | 11.5% | 13.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $106 | $77 | $58 |
| 3% | $122 | $86 | $64 |
| 4% | $144 | $98 | $71 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $86 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or VTWO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TEX shares regardless of TEX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $479M of passive capital is structurally linked to TEX through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TEX's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in TEX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If TEX (TEX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TEX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TEX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest TEX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TEX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does TEX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
TEX converts 51% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 27,429 | $63.92 | $1.8M |
| 2026-05-12 | 80 | $64.13 | $5,130.4 |
| 2026-05-08 | 94,453 | $62.82 | $5.9M |
| 2026-04-30 | 9 | $60.70 | $546.3 |
| 2026-04-27 | 383 | $62.59 | $23,971.97 |
| 2026-04-21 | 2,150 | $62.09 | $133,493.5 |
| 2026-04-10 | 192 | $64.39 | $12,362.88 |
| 2026-04-02 | 479 | $60.28 | $28,874.12 |
| 2026-03-25 | 108 | $60.62 | $6,546.96 |
| 2026-03-17 | 6,240 | $59.38 | $370,531.2 |
| 2026-03-12 | 1,547 | $62.55 | $96,764.85 |
| 2026-03-06 | 141 | $65.66 | $9,258.06 |
| 2026-02-26 | 27 | $68.19 | $1,841.13 |
| 2026-02-23 | 2,000 | $68.17 | $136,340 |
| 2026-02-19 | 42,394 | $69.06 | $2.9M |
| 2026-02-06 | 42 | $61.26 | $2,572.92 |
| 2026-02-05 | 4 | $64.25 | $257 |
| 2026-02-04 | 10,194 | $63.17 | $643,954.98 |
| 2026-02-03 | 73,757 | $58.99 | $4.4M |
| 2026-02-02 | 27 | $57.00 | $1,539 |
| 2026-01-30 | 25,743 | $57.68 | $1.5M |
| 2026-01-02 | 1,090 | $53.38 | $58,184.2 |
| 2025-12-22 | 325 | $53.95 | $17,533.75 |
| 2025-12-18 | 96 | $52.28 | $5,018.88 |
| 2025-12-05 | 345 | $50.28 | $17,346.6 |
| 2025-11-21 | 12,396 | $41.78 | $517,904.88 |
| 2025-11-20 | 35,474 | $43.42 | $1.5M |
| 2025-11-18 | 7,446 | $44.01 | $327,698.46 |
| 2025-11-05 | 914 | $46.97 | $42,930.58 |
| 2025-10-31 | 223 | $47.19 | $10,523.37 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare TEX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.