TWLO (TWLO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 5.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics reveal a significant divergence between operational efficiency and capital allocation effectiveness. Despite robust revenue growth of 13.7% year-over-year supported by healthy gross margins near 49%, the company's return on invested capital stands at merely 1.6%, indicating that earnings generation does not sufficiently outpace the cost of equity to drive value creation. This weakness is compounded by a DuPont-decomposed ROE of just 0.4%, driven primarily by low asset turnover rather than margin expansion or leverage, while maintaining a conservative equity multiplier of 1.25x. Although the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests reasonable financial stability and the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.83 points to minimal earnings manipulation risk, the inability to convert top-line growth into meaningful bottom-line returns creates substantial headwinds for long-term equity value appreciation.
Valuation metrics present a stark disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic valuations derived from discounted cash flow models. The stock trades at an exorbitant forward P/E multiple of 553.6x, which implies the market is assigning extreme growth expectations that are not currently reflected in the negligible net margin of 0.7%. In contrast, DCF analysis suggests a fair value significantly lower than current trading levels, highlighting a massive gap between consensus pricing and model-based estimates. This discrepancy indicates that investors have priced in aggressive future expansion rates that may prove difficult to sustain given the company's current inability to generate positive returns on capital.
Risk assessment is further complicated by active insider behavior, with $6.05 million in net selling over the past 90 days signaling potential caution among management or major shareholders regarding near-term prospects. While the low M-Score and moderate F-Score mitigate concerns about accounting fraud or deteriorating balance sheet quality, the combination of insubstantial ROIC, a valuation premium that ignores current profitability constraints, and significant insider outflows suggests a high-risk environment where downside protection is limited by overextended multiples.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.6% | 12.6% | 14.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $178 | $141 | $116 |
| 3% | $197 | $152 | $123 |
| 4% | $222 | $166 | $132 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $152 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYG or IJK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TWLO shares regardless of TWLO's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to TWLO through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in TWLO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If TWLO (TWLO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TWLO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 17 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TWLO Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest TWLO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TWLO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does TWLO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
TWLO converts 255% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-11.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 394,346 | $192.78 | $76.0M |
| 2026-05-12 | 179 | $198.59 | $35,547.61 |
| 2026-05-08 | 132 | $197.07 | $26,013.24 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,942 | $183.34 | $539,386.28 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,294 | $140.91 | $182,337.54 |
| 2026-04-27 | 100 | $143.79 | $14,379 |
| 2026-04-22 | 1 | $145.30 | $145.3 |
| 2026-04-20 | 478 | $140.11 | $66,972.58 |
| 2026-04-17 | 8,832 | $136.96 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-15 | 12,440 | $124.00 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-13 | 18,008 | $117.65 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-10 | 9,800 | $124.83 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-02 | 993 | $130.46 | $129,546.78 |
| 2026-04-01 | 354 | $125.82 | $44,540.28 |
| 2026-03-31 | 567 | $120.98 | $68,595.66 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,168 | $126.10 | $147,284.8 |
| 2026-03-26 | 6,742 | $125.43 | $845,649.06 |
| 2026-03-23 | 4,878 | $124.11 | $605,408.58 |
| 2026-03-19 | 9,431 | $126.55 | $1.2M |
| 2026-03-18 | 11,858 | $126.88 | $1.5M |
| 2026-03-16 | 3,503 | $124.50 | $436,123.5 |
| 2026-03-13 | 3,185 | $125.51 | $399,749.35 |
| 2026-03-12 | 6,090 | $126.68 | $771,481.2 |
| 2026-03-09 | 21 | $128.03 | $2,688.63 |
| 2026-03-02 | 244 | $120.96 | $29,514.24 |
| 2026-02-23 | 24 | $113.14 | $2,715.36 |
| 2026-02-19 | 136 | $110.62 | $15,044.32 |
| 2026-02-18 | 7 | $108.49 | $759.43 |
| 2026-02-13 | 624 | $110.41 | $68,895.84 |
| 2026-02-03 | 148 | $120.00 | $17,760 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare TWLO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.