UGI (UGI)

$7.9B
Market Cap
13.6
P/E Ratio
1.09
Beta
4.09%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 1.4 DistressBeneish M -2.64 CleanROIC−WACC -1.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company demonstrates a robust fundamental profile characterized by a high-quality earnings structure, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.64 that strongly suggests low manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 14.2% driven primarily by operational leverage rather than efficiency; specifically, the equity multiplier of 3.23x indicates significant financial leverage is amplifying returns on a modest asset turnover ratio of 0.47x and healthy net margins of 9.3%. While the gross margin stands at nearly 50%, revenue growth remains stagnant at just 1.1% year-over-year, creating a dichotomy where profitability per dollar sold is strong but top-line expansion has stalled.

Valuation metrics present a compelling divergence between historical norms and intrinsic value models. The current multiple of 13.6x sits below the typical range for utilities or regulated infrastructure sectors that often trade at premiums due to their cash flow stability, suggesting potential undervaluation relative to peers. More critically, the DCF model implies a fair value of $61, which represents a substantial gap above current market pricing if one assumes the market is discounting future growth expectations too aggressively given the solid margin profile and low manipulation scores. This discrepancy indicates that while the balance sheet supports higher returns via leverage, the stock may be trading with excessive caution regarding its limited revenue velocity.

Risk assessment reveals a notable disconnect between institutional ownership signals and fundamental metrics; over the last 90 days, insiders have executed net selling totaling $488,848. This outflow contrasts sharply with the company's strong F-Score and favorable valuation spread, potentially signaling that management anticipates headwinds not fully captured in current DCF assumptions or is simply rebalancing a portfolio despite attractive entry points. Investors must weigh whether this insider activity reflects private knowledge of operational constraints limiting future revenue growth or represents routine liquidity needs against the backdrop of a fundamentally sound but slow-growing business model.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6.1%8.1%10.1%
2%$88$48$28
3%$123$61$34
4%$190$80$43

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $61 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.64
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

49.9%
Gross Margin
9.3%
Net Margin
6.5%
ROIC
8.1%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.6%— Negative spread.
+1.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+152.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
390.0M
Free Cash Flow
83%
FCF Payout Ratio

⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

9.3%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.47x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.23x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
14.2%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.23x
Debt / Equity
0.89x
Current Ratio
2.7x
Interest Coverage
3.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.78%
FCF Yield
1.7B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-488,848
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-02-11TEMATIO JEAN FELIXSold 1/7 qtrsSale$488,848
2026-02-11TEMATIO JEAN FELIXSold 1/7 qtrsGrant$315,864
2026-01-30BORT MARY SHAWNGrant4,364 shares
2026-01-30DOSCH THEODORE AGrant4,364 shares
2026-01-30HARRIS ALAN NGrant4,364 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.81
Act: $2.21
+22.3%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.09
Act: $-0.01
+89.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.41
Act: $-0.23
+43.9%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.26
Act: $1.26
0.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.57
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$41.34
52W High
$29.03
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$730M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding UGI
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$495B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like DVY or VPU, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell UGI shares regardless of UGI's individual fundamentals. We estimate $730M of passive capital is structurally linked to UGI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on UGI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in UGI to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

UGI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
UGIEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFNEEHigh RiskSOHigh RiskDUKHigh RiskCEGMed RiskAEPHigh Risk
UGI Price Drop (%)0

If UGI (UGI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with UGI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

UGI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
UGI

Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

UGI Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does UGI convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$390M
EBITDA
$1.7B
FCF Conversion
23%
Reinvestment Rate
77%
23% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
6.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.6%

UGI converts 23% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 77% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1348,839$33.00$1.6M
2026-05-119,124$32.32$294,887.68
2026-05-072,267$35.07$79,503.69
2026-04-24676$37.20$25,147.2
2026-04-234,503$36.15$162,783.45
2026-04-14132$37.58$4,960.56
2026-04-09728$37.79$27,511.12
2026-03-2345,321$35.35$1.6M
2026-03-19739$36.33$26,847.87
2026-03-181,184$36.33$43,014.72
2026-03-0245$37.41$1,683.45
2026-02-276,477$37.42$242,369.34
2026-02-201,980$38.40$76,032
2026-02-171,311$38.76$50,814.36
2026-02-0624,582$37.83$929,937.06
2026-02-043,223$40.01$128,952.23
2026-02-03850$40.16$34,136
2026-01-307,947$40.60$322,648.2
2026-01-213,986$37.16$148,119.76
2026-01-15953$37.22$35,470.66
2025-12-2911,353$38.11$432,662.83
2025-12-261,189$38.43$45,693.27
2025-12-15104,039$38.21$4.0M
2025-12-121,678$38.04$63,831.12
2025-12-1195,731$37.58$3.6M
2025-11-243,181$37.61$119,637.41
2025-11-12126,609$34.60$4.4M
2025-11-054$33.70$134.8
2025-10-144,131$31.75$131,159.25
2025-10-09140,412$32.36$4.5M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare UGI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.