UGI (UGI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates a robust fundamental profile characterized by a high-quality earnings structure, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.64 that strongly suggests low manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 14.2% driven primarily by operational leverage rather than efficiency; specifically, the equity multiplier of 3.23x indicates significant financial leverage is amplifying returns on a modest asset turnover ratio of 0.47x and healthy net margins of 9.3%. While the gross margin stands at nearly 50%, revenue growth remains stagnant at just 1.1% year-over-year, creating a dichotomy where profitability per dollar sold is strong but top-line expansion has stalled.
Valuation metrics present a compelling divergence between historical norms and intrinsic value models. The current multiple of 13.6x sits below the typical range for utilities or regulated infrastructure sectors that often trade at premiums due to their cash flow stability, suggesting potential undervaluation relative to peers. More critically, the DCF model implies a fair value of $61, which represents a substantial gap above current market pricing if one assumes the market is discounting future growth expectations too aggressively given the solid margin profile and low manipulation scores. This discrepancy indicates that while the balance sheet supports higher returns via leverage, the stock may be trading with excessive caution regarding its limited revenue velocity.
Risk assessment reveals a notable disconnect between institutional ownership signals and fundamental metrics; over the last 90 days, insiders have executed net selling totaling $488,848. This outflow contrasts sharply with the company's strong F-Score and favorable valuation spread, potentially signaling that management anticipates headwinds not fully captured in current DCF assumptions or is simply rebalancing a portfolio despite attractive entry points. Investors must weigh whether this insider activity reflects private knowledge of operational constraints limiting future revenue growth or represents routine liquidity needs against the backdrop of a fundamentally sound but slow-growing business model.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.1% | 8.1% | 10.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $88 | $48 | $28 |
| 3% | $123 | $61 | $34 |
| 4% | $190 | $80 | $43 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $61 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like DVY or VPU, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell UGI shares regardless of UGI's individual fundamentals. We estimate $730M of passive capital is structurally linked to UGI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on UGI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in UGI to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If UGI (UGI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with UGI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
UGI Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest UGI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
UGI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does UGI convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
UGI converts 23% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 77% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 48,839 | $33.00 | $1.6M |
| 2026-05-11 | 9,124 | $32.32 | $294,887.68 |
| 2026-05-07 | 2,267 | $35.07 | $79,503.69 |
| 2026-04-24 | 676 | $37.20 | $25,147.2 |
| 2026-04-23 | 4,503 | $36.15 | $162,783.45 |
| 2026-04-14 | 132 | $37.58 | $4,960.56 |
| 2026-04-09 | 728 | $37.79 | $27,511.12 |
| 2026-03-23 | 45,321 | $35.35 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-19 | 739 | $36.33 | $26,847.87 |
| 2026-03-18 | 1,184 | $36.33 | $43,014.72 |
| 2026-03-02 | 45 | $37.41 | $1,683.45 |
| 2026-02-27 | 6,477 | $37.42 | $242,369.34 |
| 2026-02-20 | 1,980 | $38.40 | $76,032 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,311 | $38.76 | $50,814.36 |
| 2026-02-06 | 24,582 | $37.83 | $929,937.06 |
| 2026-02-04 | 3,223 | $40.01 | $128,952.23 |
| 2026-02-03 | 850 | $40.16 | $34,136 |
| 2026-01-30 | 7,947 | $40.60 | $322,648.2 |
| 2026-01-21 | 3,986 | $37.16 | $148,119.76 |
| 2026-01-15 | 953 | $37.22 | $35,470.66 |
| 2025-12-29 | 11,353 | $38.11 | $432,662.83 |
| 2025-12-26 | 1,189 | $38.43 | $45,693.27 |
| 2025-12-15 | 104,039 | $38.21 | $4.0M |
| 2025-12-12 | 1,678 | $38.04 | $63,831.12 |
| 2025-12-11 | 95,731 | $37.58 | $3.6M |
| 2025-11-24 | 3,181 | $37.61 | $119,637.41 |
| 2025-11-12 | 126,609 | $34.60 | $4.4M |
| 2025-11-05 | 4 | $33.70 | $134.8 |
| 2025-10-14 | 4,131 | $31.75 | $131,159.25 |
| 2025-10-09 | 140,412 | $32.36 | $4.5M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare UGI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.