USAR (USAR)

$30.70
+4.32%
$6.2B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
2.42
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 2/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of USAR exhibit severe distress, characterized by a negative ROIC-WACC spread that signals value destruction rather than capital appreciation. This deterioration is driven primarily by an anomalous net margin contraction to -18,110.7%, which overwhelms the modest 11.9% gross margin and suggests catastrophic operating leverage or accounting anomalies rather than sustainable pricing power. The DuPont decomposition implies a collapse in profitability that cannot be offset by asset turnover or financial leverage, as evidenced by the negative return on invested capital. Compounding this structural weakness is a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating significant deterioration across nine key financial health criteria and placing the entity well below the median threshold for fundamental stability typically required in quantitative screening models.

Valuation metrics are rendered difficult to interpret due to the absence of positive earnings, rendering traditional P/E comparisons against historical averages or sector peers mathematically invalid. Without profitable operations, any discounted cash flow (DCF) model would rely on highly speculative terminal growth assumptions and negative free cash flows, resulting in a fair value that likely reflects liquidation scenarios rather than ongoing business continuity. Consequently, the current market price implicitly prices in an expectation of total capital loss or extreme restructuring, as standard valuation multiples fail to capture the severity of the earnings collapse reflected in the reported margins.

The risk profile is exacerbated by the combination of negative returns on invested assets and a failing fundamental score, which typically correlates with high idiosyncratic volatility and low Fama-French alpha potential for value-oriented strategies. Insider activity data was not provided to assess management alignment during this downturn, leaving the trajectory dependent entirely on external capital injections or operational pivots that are currently unquantifiable from the available dataset. The convergence of negative ROIC, a failing Piotroski score, and hyper-negative net margins presents an asymmetric risk-reward profile where downside protection is minimal while upside potential remains contingent on unforeseen turnaround events not reflected in current financial statements.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

2/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics

Profitability & Value Creation

11.9%
Gross Margin
-18110.7%
Net Margin
-35.9%
ROIC
-1791.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-86.3M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.41x
Debt / Equity
10.17x
Current Ratio
-2147.8x
Interest Coverage
-297.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.04
Act: $0.58
+1550.0%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.13
Act: $-0.08
+38.5%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.07
Act: $-0.25
-275.0%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.14
Act: $-0.19
-39.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

104.0%
Annual Volatility
1.22
Sharpe (1Y)
-69.2%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

-1867.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
8.42
Price/Book
16M
Avg Volume
$43.98
52W High
$8.77
52W Low
62%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$213M
Tracked Passive Exposure
4
ETFs Holding USAR
0.86%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$25B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XME or VTWO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell USAR shares regardless of USAR's individual fundamentals. We estimate $213M of passive capital is structurally linked to USAR through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on USAR's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in USAR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

USAR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
USAREpicenterVTWOETFVAWETFXMEETFLINLow RiskNEMLow RiskFCXLow RiskNUELow RiskSTLDLow Risk
USAR Price Drop (%)0

If USAR (USAR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with USAR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

USAR Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 23 USAR shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
USAR
Total Shares
223M
ETF Lock-Up
4.4%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
4.4%Locked Float

USAR (USAR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.2% of the XME (XME) and 0.1% of the VTWO (VTWO). Across 4 tracked ETFs, approximately 10M shares (4.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

USAR Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
USAR
PRICE
$30.70
FLOOR (POC)
$16.69
STRENGTH
High
$10$11$136%$1510%$17POC 14%$1811%$209%$228%$248%$2510%$278%$29$31$30.70$33$34$36$38$40$41$43
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for USAR over the past year sits near $16.69 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $30.70 trades 83.9% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1443,203$25.42$1.1M
2026-05-13361$25.55$9,223.55
2026-05-1121,016$26.96$566,591.36
2026-05-082,981$26.38$78,638.78
2026-05-07260$28.60$7,436
2026-05-04143,668$26.33$3.8M
2026-05-0121,515$25.97$558,744.55
2026-04-30464$22.03$10,221.92
2026-04-29366,399$22.77$8.3M
2026-04-2855,633$23.51$1.3M
2026-04-2467,329$23.09$1.6M
2026-04-2329,179$25.41$741,438.39
2026-04-2289,049$22.85$2.0M
2026-04-2183,351$22.58$1.9M
2026-04-20214,992$19.95$4.3M
2026-04-17111,140$18.43$2.0M
2026-04-1652,084$18.35$955,741.4
2026-04-1511,783$16.99$200,193.17
2026-04-14178,187$16.79$3.0M
2026-04-1337,030$16.15$598,034.5
2026-04-10171,615$16.72$2.9M
2026-04-09146,951$16.78$2.5M
2026-04-0740,452$15.28$618,106.56
2026-04-0623,638$15.92$376,316.96
2026-03-312,753$14.23$39,175.19
2026-03-3038,382$15.42$591,850.44
2026-03-2716,925$16.00$270,800
2026-03-26205,932$16.64$3.4M
2026-03-24376,547$17.39$6.5M
2026-03-203,194$17.81$56,885.14

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
MP0.6220.720Moderate
ASTS0.4280.576Moderate
ACHR0.4160.641Moderate
ONDS0.4030.466Moderate
UEC0.3450.590Moderate
RKLB0.3200.513Moderate
LEU0.2850.514Low correlation
BE0.2660.524Low correlation
FCX0.2520.471Low correlation

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare USAR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.