YOU (YOU)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 4.9. Beneish M-Score of -1.29 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits robust fundamental economics, characterized by a high ROIC of 27.1% and an aggressive DuPont decomposition where equity multipliers drive returns alongside healthy asset turnover and net margins. This leverage-heavy structure is reinforced by strong profitability metrics, including a gross margin of 64.4% and revenue growth accelerating at 16.9% year-over-year. Quality indicators further support this profile; the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests solid financial health with positive operating trends, while the Beneish M-Score of -1.29 indicates a low probability of earnings manipulation. However, the valuation presents a significant divergence from these operational strengths, as the current P/E ratio of 43.5x implies substantial growth expectations that may not be fully reflected in near-term cash flows compared to historical or sector benchmarks.
A discounted cash flow analysis places fair value at $100 per share, suggesting the market is pricing in a specific trajectory of implied future growth that must materialize for current levels to remain justified. The disconnect between high-quality fundamentals and elevated multiples creates a scenario where any miss on execution could trigger a re-rating toward intrinsic value. Compounding this valuation pressure, insider activity over the last 90 days reveals net selling totaling $53.87 million, which often signals management's lack of conviction at current price levels or portfolio rebalancing rather than organic growth optimism.
The risk-reward profile is defined by a tension between superior operational efficiency and aggressive pricing relative to peers. While the high ROIC and clean earnings quality provide a defensive moat against value traps, the combination of premium valuation and significant insider outflows introduces downside volatility if consensus estimates fail to materialize. Investors must weigh whether the current multiple adequately compensates for the leverage inherent in the equity multiplier or if it leaves insufficient margin of safety given the recent capital flight from insiders.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.5% | 11.5% | 13.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $118 | $91 | $73 |
| 3% | $133 | $100 | $79 |
| 4% | $154 | $110 | $85 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $100 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell YOU shares regardless of YOU's individual fundamentals. We estimate $305M of passive capital is structurally linked to YOU through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on YOU's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in YOU to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If YOU (YOU) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with YOU. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
YOU Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest YOU Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
YOU Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does YOU convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
YOU converts 155% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 15.6% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 14 | $55.54 | $777.56 |
| 2026-05-13 | 39,617 | $57.64 | $2.3M |
| 2026-04-21 | 23 | $56.83 | $1,307.09 |
| 2026-03-26 | 1,892 | $54.48 | $103,076.16 |
| 2026-03-25 | 846 | $53.53 | $45,286.38 |
| 2026-03-23 | 328 | $48.12 | $15,783.36 |
| 2026-03-16 | 70 | $44.63 | $3,124.1 |
| 2026-03-13 | 2,160 | $44.81 | $96,789.6 |
| 2026-03-10 | 621 | $46.23 | $28,708.83 |
| 2026-02-27 | 3,735 | $47.12 | $175,993.2 |
| 2026-02-10 | 1,720 | $33.02 | $56,794.4 |
| 2026-02-06 | 97 | $32.59 | $3,161.23 |
| 2026-01-29 | 82 | $33.48 | $2,745.36 |
| 2026-01-02 | 1,829 | $35.08 | $64,161.32 |
| 2025-12-22 | 442 | $36.98 | $16,345.16 |
| 2025-12-11 | 58 | $35.77 | $2,074.66 |
| 2025-12-02 | 649 | $34.53 | $22,409.97 |
| 2025-11-26 | 854 | $35.73 | $30,513.42 |
| 2025-11-24 | 5,883 | $35.85 | $210,905.55 |
| 2025-11-14 | 100 | $38.04 | $3,804 |
| 2025-11-12 | 8,493 | $37.25 | $316,364.25 |
| 2025-11-04 | 1,822 | $30.86 | $56,226.92 |
| 2025-11-03 | 338 | $30.47 | $10,298.86 |
| 2025-10-27 | 178 | $31.30 | $5,571.4 |
| 2025-10-21 | 388 | $31.72 | $12,307.36 |
| 2025-10-16 | 390 | $31.59 | $12,320.1 |
| 2025-10-07 | 170 | $31.03 | $5,275.1 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare YOU to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.