Chewy, Inc. (CHWY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicChewy, Inc.'s P/E of 50.6 is above its sector average (35.0x), though accompanied by a 5.4% economic spread (ROIC − WACC). Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 5.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of Chewy, Inc. demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread of +5.4%, indicating that the firm generates returns significantly above its cost of equity, though this advantage is tempered by razor-thin operating economics where net margins compress to just 1.8% despite healthy gross margins near 30%. This structural dynamic suggests value creation relies heavily on volume leverage rather than pricing power or high-margin differentiation, a nuance reflected in the DuPont decomposition which points toward turnover and scale as primary drivers of returns amidst low profitability per unit sold. Balance sheet resilience appears solid given an Altman Z-Score of 5.6, well above distress thresholds, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.93 signals minimal earnings manipulation risk; however, the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates moderate fundamental strength with room for improvement in financial robustness or profitability trends compared to top-tier issuers.
Valuation metrics reveal a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. Trading at approximately 50.6x forward earnings, the stock commands a substantial premium over its sector average of roughly 34.6x, implying that investors are pricing in aggressive future growth expectations not fully supported by recent revenue expansion which remains modest at 6.2% year-over-year. This disparity is stark when contrasted against a DCF-derived fair value of $29, suggesting the current market multiple embeds an implied growth rate and margin trajectory that may be overly optimistic given the company's historical performance profile. The gap between the elevated P/E ratio and the discounted cash flow model highlights a potential mean reversion risk if revenue acceleration fails to materialize at speeds required to justify such high multiples relative to peer benchmarks.
Risk assessment further complicates the investment thesis, as the combination of low net margins and moderate growth rates creates sensitivity to margin compression or operational inefficiencies that could rapidly erode value in a downturn. While the strong Z-Score mitigates immediate solvency concerns, the reliance on thin spreads means any deviation in gross margin stability or inventory turnover would disproportionately impact bottom-line results, leaving little cushion for error against the high valuation floor currently supported by sentiment rather than fundamental earnings power.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 12.5% | 14.5% | 16.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $33 | $27 | $23 |
| 3% | $35 | $29 | $24 |
| 4% | $38 | $31 | $25 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $29 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CHWY shares regardless of Chewy, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $350M of passive capital is structurally linked to CHWY through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CHWY's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Chewy, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CHWY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CHWY Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CHWY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CHWY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Chewy, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Chewy, Inc. converts 142% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 5 | $22.90 | $114.5 |
| 2026-05-11 | 570,219 | $22.97 | $13.1M |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,133 | $25.54 | $54,476.82 |
| 2026-04-20 | 366 | $27.52 | $10,072.32 |
| 2026-04-10 | 1,900 | $26.00 | $49,400 |
| 2026-04-09 | 2,148 | $26.46 | $56,836.08 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2,804 | $26.22 | $73,520.88 |
| 2026-03-31 | 3,159 | $25.88 | $81,754.92 |
| 2026-03-30 | 34,433 | $26.12 | $899,389.96 |
| 2026-03-27 | 22,069 | $27.01 | $596,083.69 |
| 2026-03-26 | 14,239 | $26.57 | $378,330.23 |
| 2026-03-24 | 225,530 | $23.59 | $5.3M |
| 2026-03-23 | 48 | $23.37 | $1,121.76 |
| 2026-03-18 | 2,974 | $25.22 | $75,004.28 |
| 2026-03-11 | 21,375 | $25.64 | $548,055 |
| 2026-03-10 | 21,302 | $26.15 | $557,047.3 |
| 2026-02-20 | 164 | $25.86 | $4,241.04 |
| 2026-02-02 | 17 | $29.11 | $494.87 |
| 2026-01-29 | 395 | $31.02 | $12,252.9 |
| 2026-01-28 | 1,250 | $31.30 | $39,125 |
| 2026-01-20 | 500 | $33.74 | $16,870 |
| 2026-01-13 | 338 | $33.99 | $11,488.62 |
| 2026-01-08 | 16,571 | $32.00 | $530,272 |
| 2025-12-30 | 534 | $33.26 | $17,760.84 |
| 2025-12-22 | 100 | $32.46 | $3,246 |
| 2025-12-03 | 1,488 | $33.47 | $49,803.36 |
| 2025-12-01 | 322 | $34.77 | $11,195.94 |
| 2025-11-28 | 68 | $34.22 | $2,326.96 |
| 2025-11-03 | 125 | $33.72 | $4,215 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CHWY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.