CNX Resources Corporation (CNX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 10.1x earnings — a 71% discount to the sector average of 34.8x — CNX is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of CNX Resources Corporation display a compelling divergence between high-quality earnings generation and elevated financial distress signals. The company demonstrates robust operational leverage with a net margin of 29.5% and gross margin expansion to 47.2%, driving revenue growth of 48.9%. This efficiency is reflected in an ROIC-WACC spread of +2.3%, indicating value creation above the cost of capital, while the DuPont decomposition suggests returns are primarily fueled by exceptional profitability rather than leverage or asset turnover. Creditworthiness metrics present a conflicting narrative; the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.37 strongly signal financial integrity and low earnings manipulation risk, yet the Altman Z-Score of 1.5 flags potential proximity to insolvency or bankruptcy territory that warrants caution despite otherwise strong fundamentals.
Valuation metrics suggest a significant discount relative to both historical norms and peer benchmarks, creating a wide gap between current pricing and intrinsic value estimates. Trading at a P/E ratio of 10.1x against a sector average of 30.5x implies the market is applying a severe punitive multiple, likely anchoring on the low Altman Z-Score rather than the superior margin expansion and Piotroski score. A DCF analysis places fair value at $202, suggesting current prices are materially undervalued if one assumes continued execution of the reported 48.9% revenue growth trajectory without immediate liquidity crises materializing.
The risk/reward profile is characterized by extreme volatility driven by a sharp bifurcation in credit metrics versus operational performance. While the low Altman Z-Score introduces substantial downside risk regarding solvency, the high Piotroski and Beneish scores mitigate concerns about earnings quality or fraud. Investors must weigh whether the market has overcorrected based on distress signals that may not align with the company's actual cash flow generation capabilities indicated by its ROIC spread and margin profile.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.4% | 9.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $234 | $166 | $114 |
| 3% | $309 | $202 | $131 |
| 4% | $460 | $260 | $154 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $202 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CNX shares regardless of CNX Resources Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $334M of passive capital is structurally linked to CNX through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CNX's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in CNX Resources Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CNX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CNX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CNX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CNX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does CNX Resources Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
CNX Resources Corporation converts 35% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 65% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.3% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 908 | $35.41 | $32,152.28 |
| 2026-05-11 | 829 | $35.72 | $29,611.88 |
| 2026-05-07 | 21,111 | $36.55 | $771,607.05 |
| 2026-05-06 | 7,814 | $38.02 | $297,088.28 |
| 2026-05-04 | 28 | $37.88 | $1,060.64 |
| 2026-04-30 | 12,122 | $39.32 | $476,637.04 |
| 2026-04-28 | 6,937 | $38.52 | $267,213.24 |
| 2026-04-21 | 906 | $37.95 | $34,382.7 |
| 2026-04-15 | 185 | $38.37 | $7,098.45 |
| 2026-04-14 | 38,257 | $39.29 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-10 | 235 | $38.82 | $9,122.7 |
| 2026-04-09 | 1,398 | $38.58 | $53,934.84 |
| 2026-04-02 | 5 | $38.43 | $192.15 |
| 2026-03-31 | 4,992 | $39.98 | $199,580.16 |
| 2026-03-30 | 3,104 | $40.58 | $125,960.32 |
| 2026-03-26 | 72 | $40.38 | $2,907.36 |
| 2026-03-17 | 324 | $41.96 | $13,595.04 |
| 2026-03-02 | 550 | $41.78 | $22,979 |
| 2026-02-25 | 748 | $37.56 | $28,094.88 |
| 2026-02-17 | 59 | $40.60 | $2,395.4 |
| 2026-02-12 | 88,620 | $39.97 | $3.5M |
| 2026-02-06 | 58,144 | $38.93 | $2.3M |
| 2026-02-05 | 58,144 | $38.90 | $2.3M |
| 2026-02-04 | 58,144 | $38.33 | $2.2M |
| 2026-02-03 | 58,144 | $37.36 | $2.2M |
| 2026-01-30 | 862 | $37.60 | $32,411.2 |
| 2026-01-13 | 109,061 | $35.76 | $3.9M |
| 2026-01-09 | 124,252 | $35.28 | $4.4M |
| 2026-01-05 | 5 | $36.46 | $182.3 |
| 2025-12-15 | 478 | $38.49 | $18,398.22 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CNX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.