Consumer Cyclical

DraftKings Inc. (DKNG)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.60 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of DraftKings Inc. present a dichotomy between robust top-line expansion and currently depressed capital efficiency. While the company demonstrates strong revenue growth of 27% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins at 41.2%, its return on invested capital stands at -0.4%, indicating that current investments are not yet generating excess returns over the cost of capital. This operational phase is corroborated by a net margin compressing to just 0.1%, suggesting significant reinvestment needs or pricing pressures despite high gross profitability. Qualitative financial health metrics remain robust, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.60, which together signal strong earnings quality with low probability of manipulation, even as the business transitions toward scale rather than immediate accretion.

Valuation analysis reveals a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. The stock trades at an implied multiple far exceeding its historical norms and the sector average P/E of 35.2x, indicating that the market is aggressively pricing in sustained high-growth trajectories without fully accounting for near-term margin compression or negative ROIC. However, a discounted cash flow model assigns a fair value of $32, implying that current levels may be materially elevated relative to fundamental cash generation capabilities if growth rates moderate. This suggests the equity price relies heavily on future expansion assumptions rather than present earnings power, creating a scenario where downside risk is concentrated in potential multiple contraction should revenue momentum slow or profitability fail to materialize soon.

The synthesis of these factors points to a high-risk, high-volatility profile typical of early-stage scaling platforms. While the low Beneish M-Score and strong F-Score mitigate concerns regarding financial statement integrity, the negative ROIC combined with an ultra-premium valuation leaves little margin for error in execution. Investors must weigh the certainty of top-line growth against the uncertainty of when operating leverage will turn positive to justify current multiple expectations. The gap between DCF fair value and market price implies that any miss on future revenue or margin expansion could trigger a sharp repricing, while successful scaling toward profitability would be required to sustain valuation support in this consumer cyclical environment.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$40$29$22
3%$47$32$24
4%$58$37$27

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $32 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.60
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

41.3%
Gross Margin
0.1%
Net Margin
-0.4%
ROIC
+27.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+100.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
508.4M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

6.18x
Debt / Equity
1.03x
Current Ratio
2.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
259.7M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.12
Act: $0.12
-2.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.38
-6.3%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.26
Act: $-0.26
-1.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.36
-12.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$516M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding DKNG
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$348B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VFQY or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DKNG shares regardless of DraftKings Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $516M of passive capital is structurally linked to DKNG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DKNG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in DraftKings Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

DKNG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
DKNGEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskTJXLow RiskMCDLow Risk
DKNG Price Drop (%)0

If DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DKNG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

DKNG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
DKNG

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

DKNG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does DraftKings Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$508M
EBITDA
$260M
FCF Conversion
196%
Reinvestment Rate
-96%
196% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

DraftKings Inc. converts 196% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1437,995$25.03$951,014.85
2026-05-12177,265$24.51$4.3M
2026-05-11500$25.52$12,760
2026-05-081,986$25.22$50,086.92
2026-05-0770,012$23.92$1.7M
2026-05-041,517$23.00$34,891
2026-04-223,050$22.99$70,119.5
2026-04-215,423$22.89$124,132.47
2026-04-201$22.82$22.82
2026-04-1544$22.96$1,010.24
2026-04-1381$22.23$1,800.63
2026-04-09474$23.94$11,347.56
2026-04-071,001$22.90$22,922.9
2026-04-06800$23.16$18,528
2026-04-021$22.16$22.16
2026-03-277$21.27$148.89
2026-03-12231,923$25.57$5.9M
2026-03-11378,321$25.14$9.5M
2026-03-1089,666$25.16$2.3M
2026-03-0964$25.15$1,609.6
2026-03-03259,077$23.82$6.2M
2026-02-2344,956$22.31$1.0M
2026-02-20100$22.49$2,249
2026-02-18184,889$22.59$4.2M
2026-02-1335,742$25.16$899,268.72
2026-02-0928$26.62$745.36
2026-02-0613,925$25.52$355,366
2026-02-0433,428$26.76$894,533.28
2026-02-0310,000$27.42$274,200
2026-02-0227$27.51$742.77

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare DKNG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.