Industrials

Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS)

$11.7B
Market Cap
42.9
P/E Ratio
0.26
Beta
0.80%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 4.6 SafeBeneish M -2.50 CleanROIC−WACC +0.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

DRS trades at 42.9x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 44.7x. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Leonardo DRS, Inc. present a mixed profile characterized by strong operational integrity but modest capital efficiency. A Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.50 signal robust financial health with low earnings manipulation risk, while an Altman Z-Score of 4.6 confirms the company remains safely within safe territory regarding bankruptcy probability. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals that value creation is constrained; despite solid revenue growth of 12.8% and healthy net margins at 7.6%, the return on invested capital sits at just 8.3%. This generates a narrow ROIC-WACC spread of only +0.5%, indicating that the firm's current operations barely exceed its cost of capital, suggesting limited value accretion from existing assets relative to risk-free rates plus equity premiums.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in significant future growth expectations that are not yet reflected in historical performance or sector norms. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 42.9x, which sits slightly below the industrials sector average of 44.9x, implying relative attractiveness compared to peers despite its premium multiple. However, this valuation is heavily dependent on implied growth assumptions; if the current trajectory cannot sustain high earnings expansion, the compressed ROIC-WACC spread may prevent returns from materializing as anticipated by the P/E ratio. The DCF model anchors fair value at $46, providing a specific benchmark against which current market pricing must be weighed to determine whether the premium is justified or speculative.

The risk-reward dynamic hinges on the ability of management to deploy capital more efficiently to widen that thin ROIC-WACC spread. While the low manipulation scores and strong Z-Score mitigate downside tail risks associated with fraud or insolvency, the narrow economic moat created by a 0.5% excess return over cost of capital leaves little margin for error in execution. Investors must assess whether the current valuation embeds sufficient confidence that future strategic initiatives will transform this industrials player into one capable of generating returns significantly above its WACC, thereby unlocking value beyond the conservative DCF baseline.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.9%9.9%
2%$58$39$29
3%$75$46$32
4%$110$56$36

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $46 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

42.9x
DRS P/E
44.7x
Sector Avg
-4%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
4.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.50
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

23.8%
Gross Margin
7.6%
Net Margin
8.3%
ROIC
7.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +0.5%— Positive spread.
+12.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+30.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
227.0M
Free Cash Flow
42%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.64x
Debt / Equity
1.89x
Current Ratio
43.0x
Interest Coverage
-0.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
1.99%
FCF Yield
437.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.17
Act: $0.20
+21.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.21
Act: $0.23
+7.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.28
Act: $0.29
+3.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.37
Act: $0.42
+13.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

31.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.30
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$49.31
52W High
$28.17
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$163M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding DRS
0.14%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$114B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XAR or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DRS shares regardless of Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $163M of passive capital is structurally linked to DRS through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DRS's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Leonardo DRS, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

DRS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
DRSEpicenterVONGETFVBKETFDGRWETFMSFTLow RiskCATLow RiskAAPLLow RiskNVDALow RiskRKLBLow Risk
DRS Price Drop (%)0

If Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Microsoft Corp (MSFT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DRS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

DRS Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
DRS

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

DRS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Leonardo DRS, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$227M
EBITDA
$437M
FCF Conversion
52%
Reinvestment Rate
48%
52% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
0.5%

Leonardo DRS, Inc. converts 52% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1476,934$42.50$3.3M
2026-04-221,538$43.20$66,441.6
2026-03-242,805$44.40$124,542
2026-03-231,023$43.82$44,827.86
2026-03-12134$46.16$6,185.44
2026-03-051,773$46.95$83,242.35
2026-03-02160$43.39$6,942.4
2026-02-26246$42.36$10,420.56
2026-02-241,939$38.14$73,953.46
2026-02-13190$37.77$7,176.3
2026-01-29545$42.47$23,146.15
2025-12-2651$34.52$1,760.52
2025-12-23382$34.77$13,282.14
2025-11-2130$33.08$992.4
2025-11-1286$35.59$3,060.74
2025-11-056,417$36.15$231,974.55

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare DRS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.