Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicDRS trades at 42.9x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 44.7x. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Leonardo DRS, Inc. present a mixed profile characterized by strong operational integrity but modest capital efficiency. A Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.50 signal robust financial health with low earnings manipulation risk, while an Altman Z-Score of 4.6 confirms the company remains safely within safe territory regarding bankruptcy probability. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals that value creation is constrained; despite solid revenue growth of 12.8% and healthy net margins at 7.6%, the return on invested capital sits at just 8.3%. This generates a narrow ROIC-WACC spread of only +0.5%, indicating that the firm's current operations barely exceed its cost of capital, suggesting limited value accretion from existing assets relative to risk-free rates plus equity premiums.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in significant future growth expectations that are not yet reflected in historical performance or sector norms. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 42.9x, which sits slightly below the industrials sector average of 44.9x, implying relative attractiveness compared to peers despite its premium multiple. However, this valuation is heavily dependent on implied growth assumptions; if the current trajectory cannot sustain high earnings expansion, the compressed ROIC-WACC spread may prevent returns from materializing as anticipated by the P/E ratio. The DCF model anchors fair value at $46, providing a specific benchmark against which current market pricing must be weighed to determine whether the premium is justified or speculative.
The risk-reward dynamic hinges on the ability of management to deploy capital more efficiently to widen that thin ROIC-WACC spread. While the low manipulation scores and strong Z-Score mitigate downside tail risks associated with fraud or insolvency, the narrow economic moat created by a 0.5% excess return over cost of capital leaves little margin for error in execution. Investors must assess whether the current valuation embeds sufficient confidence that future strategic initiatives will transform this industrials player into one capable of generating returns significantly above its WACC, thereby unlocking value beyond the conservative DCF baseline.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $58 | $39 | $29 |
| 3% | $75 | $46 | $32 |
| 4% | $110 | $56 | $36 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $46 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XAR or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DRS shares regardless of Leonardo DRS, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $163M of passive capital is structurally linked to DRS through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DRS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Leonardo DRS, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Microsoft Corp (MSFT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DRS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DRS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest DRS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
DRS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Leonardo DRS, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Leonardo DRS, Inc. converts 52% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 76,934 | $42.50 | $3.3M |
| 2026-04-22 | 1,538 | $43.20 | $66,441.6 |
| 2026-03-24 | 2,805 | $44.40 | $124,542 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1,023 | $43.82 | $44,827.86 |
| 2026-03-12 | 134 | $46.16 | $6,185.44 |
| 2026-03-05 | 1,773 | $46.95 | $83,242.35 |
| 2026-03-02 | 160 | $43.39 | $6,942.4 |
| 2026-02-26 | 246 | $42.36 | $10,420.56 |
| 2026-02-24 | 1,939 | $38.14 | $73,953.46 |
| 2026-02-13 | 190 | $37.77 | $7,176.3 |
| 2026-01-29 | 545 | $42.47 | $23,146.15 |
| 2025-12-26 | 51 | $34.52 | $1,760.52 |
| 2025-12-23 | 382 | $34.77 | $13,282.14 |
| 2025-11-21 | 30 | $33.08 | $992.4 |
| 2025-11-12 | 86 | $35.59 | $3,060.74 |
| 2025-11-05 | 6,417 | $36.15 | $231,974.55 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare DRS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.