IE00BK9ZQ967 (IE00BK9ZQ967)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 9/9, Altman Z 6.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency is exceptionally robust, evidenced by an ROIC of 20.4% significantly outpacing the cost of equity at a spread of +8.6%, indicating strong value creation relative to financing costs. This high return on invested capital is underpinned by superior profitability metrics rather than operational leverage or debt magnification; specifically, a net margin of 13.7% and gross margin of 36.2% drive the returns while maintaining healthy revenue growth of 7.5%. The fundamental quality signals are nearly flawless across multiple screening frameworks: a perfect Piotroski F-Score of 9/9 suggests maximum financial strength based on nine distinct criteria, an Altman Z-Score of 6.6 places the entity far into safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk, and a Beneish M-Score of -2.48 strongly indicates low probability of earnings manipulation.
Valuation analysis reveals a significant premium relative to historical norms and peer averages, with the current multiple at 30.8x trailing twelve-month earnings implying substantial growth expectations embedded in the price. While the discounted cash flow model calculates an intrinsic fair value of $308, the market's willingness to pay such a high P/E suggests investors are pricing in acceleration beyond the observed 7.5% revenue expansion or assuming margin compression is unlikely given the current spread dynamics. The divergence between the conservative DCF output and the aggressive multiple implies that any downside catalyst would likely stem from an inability to sustain the current ROIC-WACC spread rather than a fundamental deterioration in asset quality, as indicated by the pristine F-Score.
From a risk-reward perspective, the convergence of extreme financial health metrics with elevated valuation creates a profile where capital preservation is well-secured but upside depends entirely on maintaining growth velocity. The absence of distress signals across all three major scoring models mitigates tail risks typically associated with quantitative screens, yet the high entry multiple leaves little margin for error if revenue growth decelerates or operating leverage fails to materialize as priced in by the market.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.8% | 11.8% | 13.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $365 | $282 | $227 |
| 3% | $411 | $308 | $243 |
| 4% | $472 | $341 | $263 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $308 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SCHG or SCHX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IE00BK9ZQ967 shares regardless of IE00BK9ZQ967's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to IE00BK9ZQ967 through 7 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in IE00BK9ZQ967 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If IE00BK9ZQ967 (IE00BK9ZQ967) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with IE00BK9ZQ967. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
IE00BK9ZQ967 Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest IE00BK9ZQ967 Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
IE00BK9ZQ967 Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does IE00BK9ZQ967 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
IE00BK9ZQ967 converts 66% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 8.6% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare IE00BK9ZQ967 to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.