iShares Core S&P 500 ETF(IVV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe iShares Core S&P 500 ETF maintains a substantial asset base exceeding $762 billion while operating with an expense ratio of just 3 basis points, reflecting its status as a low-cost vehicle for broad U.S. large-cap equity exposure. Quantitatively, the fund's structure is heavily influenced by sector concentration within technology, which accounts for nearly one-third of total assets under management. This dominance is further amplified by top holdings analysis, where the five largest positions are all classified within communication services or technology sectors, collectively representing a significant portion of the portfolio's weight. Specifically, NVIDIA alone commands 7.7% of the fund, followed closely by Apple and Microsoft at nearly 7% each, creating a high degree of overlap between individual stock concentration and sector allocation.
Geographically, the provided data indicates a purely domestic U.S.-centric tilt inherent to its underlying index methodology, with no international exposure disclosed in these metrics. The top ten holdings reveal that more than half are concentrated among seven specific names, suggesting that performance will be highly correlated with the fortunes of mega-cap tech giants and select consumer cyclical leaders like Amazon and Tesla. While financial services and healthcare remain present as notable sectors at roughly 11% and 9% respectively, they trail significantly behind the technology-heavy skew observed in both sector weights and individual stock rankings. The inclusion of Berkshire Hathaway as a top ten holding adds an element of diversified conglomerate exposure to otherwise high-growth tech names, though its classification remains distinct from standard industry peers. Ultimately, the fund's composition suggests that returns will be driven disproportionately by innovations and market movements within the technology sector rather than being evenly distributed across all eleven S&P 500 sectors.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 06:28:37.780449+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 10/100The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) explicitly tracks the broad U.S. large-cap equity market, meaning its name and mandate do not imply a specific investment theme such as clean energy or artificial intelligence. Consequently, every holding in the portfolio is inherently aligned with the fund's stated objective of replicating the performance of the S&P 500 index rather than adhering to a niche sector strategy. The presence of dominant technology names like NVIDIA and Apple reflects their significant weight within the broader market index itself, not an active tilt by the fund manager toward that specific industry.
Sector weights demonstrate high coherence with the composition of the U.S. large-cap equity universe, where technology currently holds substantial influence alongside financials and healthcare. The portfolio exhibits a diversified structure across twelve distinct sectors, preventing over-reliance on any single industry while naturally concentrating in areas where market capitalization is largest. With a top-ten concentration of 39.2%, the fund maintains exposure to key leaders without deviating from its mandate to mirror the index's risk profile and sector distribution. This approach ensures the vehicle serves as a representative proxy for the overall U.S. large-cap market rather than offering differentiated thematic returns.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 05:13:23.389221+00
⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis
AI GeneratedThe newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF reveal a convergence of systemic macro-level threats centered on regulatory expansion and operational cost escalation. A primary emerging concern is the potential material adverse impact resulting from compliance with climate change regulations, which has been explicitly flagged by NVIDIA as a factor that could significantly affect financial conditions. This environmental risk appears to be part of a broader trend where large-cap technology firms are facing increasing scrutiny regarding their carbon footprints and regulatory adherence. Simultaneously, there is a distinct macro-level pressure arising from the intersection of cybersecurity requirements and data privacy laws; these disclosures indicate that maintaining compliance may drive up operational costs across major players like NVIDIA while simultaneously constraining business operations through stricter data governance mandates.
The concentration of exposure to these shared risks within this fund's portfolio suggests a high degree of correlated downside potential, particularly given the dominance of technology names in the top holdings. With seven of the ten largest positions by weight—ranging from 2.5% to 7.7%—being major technology or communications providers, the fund exhibits significant overlap regarding AI regulation and cybersecurity costs. NVIDIA's specific disclosure that responsible use of artificial intelligence regulations could impact its competitive position highlights a sector-wide vulnerability where regulatory frameworks may alter market dynamics for multiple high-weight constituents simultaneously. This clustering implies that adverse shifts in policy related to climate action, data privacy, or artificial intelligence governance would likely affect the fund's performance disproportionately compared to a more diversified portfolio with lower exposure to these specific sectors.
While systemic risks dominate the current disclosure landscape, company-specific factors remain relevant due to individual weightings. NVIDIA holds the largest position at 7.7%, meaning that any material adverse impact from climate compliance or AI regulation would exert outsized pressure on the fund's overall returns relative to smaller holdings like Exxon Mobil or Johnson & Johnson. The specific mention of competitive positioning being impacted by AI regulations for this top-weighted stock underscores how regulatory headwinds could differentially affect valuation multiples within the portfolio. Observers should note that while these risks are presented as potential future events in 10-K filings, their realization depends on evolving legislative environments and corporate adaptation strategies unique to each entity.
Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 07:01:54.380213+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF reveals a pronounced tilt toward technology, which accounts for nearly one-third of total assets and is heavily concentrated in just three mega-cap holdings. This significant weighting indicates that the fund's performance will be disproportionately influenced by the valuation movements of specific giants like NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft, creating inherent concentration risk within a single industry vertical. While financial services, communication services, and consumer cyclicals provide moderate diversification across roughly 140 combined positions, their individual weightings remain substantially lower than that of technology, suggesting the fund does not aim to offer broad sector neutrality but rather tracks the market leadership as currently defined by large-cap tech dominance.
The top ten holdings collectively represent nearly forty percent of the portfolio's net asset value, highlighting an extreme reliance on a narrow set of equities for overall returns. This structure implies that volatility in these specific names will have an outsized impact on the ETF's price action compared to funds with more evenly distributed sector exposures or smaller caps. Although healthcare and industrials offer some breadth across dozens of constituents, their relatively modest allocations mean they play a secondary role in shaping the fund's risk profile. The data suggests this vehicle is designed for investors seeking efficient exposure to the largest U.S. companies as currently weighted by market capitalization, accepting that sector-specific shocks or regulatory changes affecting the technology sector could materially alter portfolio stability without significant internal hedging mechanisms present within the allocation itself.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 19:25:10.632147+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share IVV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of IVV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 505 | 100.0% |
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 500 | 99.8% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 499 | 99.7% |
| URTHiShares MSCI World ETF | $7B | — | 459 | 99.3% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 459 | 99.3% |
100% of IVV's portfolio by weight is also held by ITOT. When ITOT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IVV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIVV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 95% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 85% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside IVV collectively pay out 35% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 66% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryIVV is up 28.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +34.9%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 6.3% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 84% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of IVV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of IVV's analyzed weight, 79% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 21% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 78% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
IVV has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.8% of the market capitalization of IVV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 52 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. Technology | 7.74% | 32.4x | 4/9 |
| 2 | AAPL | Apple, Inc. Technology | 6.86% | 37.7x | 8/9 |
| 3 | MSFT | Microsoft Corp. Technology | 6.14% | 26.8x | 5/9 |
| 4 | AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 3.84% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 5 | GOOGL | Alphabet, Inc. Communication Services | 3.11% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | AVGO | Broadcom, Inc. Technology | 2.79% | 86.9x | 8/9 |
| 7 | GOOG | Alphabet, Inc. Communication Services | 2.49% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 8 | META | Meta Platforms, Inc. Communication Services | 2.46% | 23.0x | 5/9 |
| 9 | TSLA | Tesla, Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 2.16% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 10 | BRKB | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. | 1.57% | — | — |
| 11 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. Financial Services | 1.50% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 12 | LLY | Eli Lilly & Co. Healthcare | 1.46% | 39.2x | 7/9 |
| 13 | V | Visa, Inc. Financial Services | 1.01% | 28.5x | 6/9 |
| 14 | XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp. Energy | 0.87% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 15 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson Healthcare | 0.85% | 26.1x | 4/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how IVV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 44.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.74% | 315,680,485 | $58.9B |
| 2 | AAPL | 6.86% | 191,959,090 | $52.2B |
| 3 | MSFT | 6.14% | 96,553,790 | $46.7B |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.84% | 126,377,371 | $29.2B |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.11% | 75,581,426 | $23.7B |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.79% | 61,348,096 | $21.2B |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.49% | 60,408,239 | $19.0B |
| 8 | META | 2.46% | 28,292,896 | $18.7B |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.16% | 36,503,858 | $16.4B |
| 10 | BRKB | 1.57% | 23,821,972 | $12.0B |
| 11 | JPM | 1.50% | 35,364,814 | $11.4B |
| 12 | LLY | 1.46% | 10,316,404 | $11.1B |
| 13 | V | 1.01% | 21,923,947 | $7.7B |
| 14 | XOM | 0.87% | 54,785,052 | $6.6B |
| 15 | JNJ | 0.85% | 31,299,071 | $6.5B |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove IVV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of $749.14 for the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF sits within a broader context where institutional positioning can be inferred through specific technical structures, though definitive conclusions require additional data points not currently provided. In the absence of explicit Moving Average crossover details or volume trend metrics in the immediate dataset, any assessment regarding larger players' accumulation or distribution strategies remains hypothetical rather than factual based solely on this snapshot. Typically, significant shifts in institutional behavior are often mirrored by sustained price actions relative to key moving averages and accompanied by divergent volume patterns that suggest either aggressive building of positions or strategic exits. Without these specific indicators visible here, one cannot determine if large entities are currently increasing their exposure to the large-cap blend sector or reducing it through normal market fluctuations. The single data point provided offers a static view of valuation but lacks the temporal depth necessary to identify momentum shifts that usually precede major institutional moves. Observers often look for confluence between price levels and support/resistance zones defined by historical averages; however, since those specific relationships are not detailed in this summary, no clear signal emerges regarding whether sophisticated market participants are viewing the current level as an attractive entry point or a zone of resistance. The technical landscape described by missing volume trends and crossover events would typically illuminate if there is hidden buying pressure beneath surface-level price stability or if selling interest from major holders is quietly mounting despite apparent calm in daily pricing. Consequently, while the ETF represents a core holding for
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How IVV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($762.37B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.