RSP(RSP)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio exhibits a broad market-capitalization profile with significant exposure across technology, industrials, and financial services sectors. Valuation metrics indicate a weighted price-to-earnings multiple of 21.6x and a price-to-book ratio of 9.51x, suggesting the underlying assets trade at premiums relative to traditional value benchmarks. Geographic diversification is implied through the mix of global leaders in semiconductors, healthcare, and aerospace defense, while sector tilts toward technology and industrials reflect an orientation toward growth-oriented industries rather than defensive utilities or consumer staples.
Concentration risk remains moderate given that no single holding exceeds 0.5% of assets, with top positions including semiconductor firms like SNDK and MU alongside industrial giants such as LMT and HII. This sector allocation diverges from a standard market index by emphasizing industrials at 12.7% and technology at 12.2%, while maintaining substantial weight in other categories totaling 14.4%. Such a composition would likely perform favorably during macro environments characterized by robust capital expenditure cycles, strong corporate earnings growth, or technological innovation booms. Conversely, the portfolio may face headwinds if economic conditions deteriorate into high inflationary stagflation or if interest rate volatility disproportionately impacts valuation-sensitive large-cap technology and industrial equities.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 06:49:31.701112+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100The investment theme implied by the ticker RSP is typically associated with a broad market index strategy, specifically tracking the S&P 500 ex-Energy sector. The provided holdings list and sector breakdown confirm this alignment rather than contradicting it; there are no thematic outliers or unrelated mega-cap stocks that suggest a deviation from its benchmark. Instead of focusing on a specific industry like technology or healthcare, the fund maintains a diversified exposure across twelve distinct sectors, with weights in industrials, technology, financial services, and consumer staples closely mirroring the composition of a broad U.S. equity index after removing energy companies. The presence of holdings such as LMT, HII, and NOC within industrials alongside tech names like SNDK and MU demonstrates a standard market-cap weighted approach rather than a concentrated thematic bet.
Concentration risk appears minimal given that the top ten positions collectively represent only 2.9% of assets under management, indicating a highly diversified portfolio where no single holding or small group can disproportionately influence performance. The sector coherence is consistent with an ex-energy broad market strategy, as energy constitutes just 4.6% of the total allocation while other major sectors like industrials and technology hover around 12%, reflecting their typical weighting in the broader U.S. economy minus that specific industry. This structure differentiates the fund from a standard all-cap index by excluding one entire sector, yet it remains fundamentally similar to broad market benchmarks in terms of risk profile and diversification. The data suggests the vehicle functions as intended for investors seeking wide exposure with a single-sector omission rather than pursuing active thematic differentiation or high-concentration strategies.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-18 20:08:44.248867+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of RSP presents a market-capitalization weighted profile that heavily favors large-cap equities, as evidenced by the significant representation in Technology and Financial Services. While these two sectors combined account for nearly 24% of the portfolio, they are not the dominant forces; instead, Industrials lead at 12.7%, followed closely by Healthcare at 9.6%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on broad market exposure rather than a specific thematic tilt toward growth or value within any single industry group. The presence of substantial weightings across defensive sectors like Consumer Defensive and Utilities indicates that the fund is designed to capture overall economic performance while maintaining some inherent stability through established, mature industries.
Concentration risk appears mitigated by an exceptionally low top-10 holding concentration of 2.9%, which implies a highly diversified structure where no single stock exerts disproportionate influence on returns. The uniformity in weighting among the largest positions further supports this observation, suggesting that performance will be driven more by aggregate sector movements than idiosyncratic company outcomes. This approach aligns with a passive strategy aiming to replicate broad market indices rather than seeking alpha through active stock selection or concentrated bets on specific leaders.
In terms of factor tilts, the allocation does not exhibit an aggressive bias toward high-growth sectors relative to their historical averages in many cases, nor does it aggressively underweight them. The balanced spread across Industrials and Consumer Cyclical stocks hints at a neutral stance regarding value versus growth factors within those areas. Ultimately, the fund's structure reflects a commitment to broad diversification with minimal sector-specific overexposure, positioning it as a tool for capturing general market beta rather than specific industry or factor-driven returns.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 05:06:40.381073+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share RSP's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of RSP's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF | $762B | 0.03% | 476 | 94.7% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 476 | 94.7% |
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 473 | 94.3% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 472 | 93.9% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 469 | 93.3% |
95% of RSP's portfolio by weight is also held by IVV, which commands 9× more assets under management. When IVV receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging RSP's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofRSP's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 88% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 42% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside RSP collectively pay out 79% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is stretched — a prolonged earnings slump could force constituent companies to cut dividends. Based on 30% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryRSP is up 20.0% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +3.4%. The remaining +16.6% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 40% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of RSP's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of RSP's analyzed weight, 51% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 49% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 37% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
RSP has a Passive Crowding Score of 47/100. On average, 14.1% of the market capitalization of RSP's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 24 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | Sandisk Corp. Technology | 0.48% | 57.8x | 5/9 |
| 2 | MU | Micron Technology, Inc. Technology | 0.31% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 3 | MRNA | Moderna, Inc. | 0.30% | — | — |
| 4 | LRCX | Lam Research Corp. Technology | 0.27% | 60.3x | 7/9 |
| 5 | WDC | Western Digital Corp. Technology | 0.27% | 31.8x | 6/9 |
| 6 | G7997R103 | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 0.27% | — | — |
| 7 | LMT | Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials | 0.26% | 25.7x | 6/9 |
| 8 | HII | Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Industrials | 0.25% | 20.0x | 8/9 |
| 9 | FCX | Freeport-McMoRan Inc. Basic Materials | 0.25% | 34.8x | 6/9 |
| 10 | ALB | Albemarle Corp. Basic Materials | 0.25% | — | 5/9 |
| 11 | V7780T103 | Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 0.24% | — | — |
| 12 | NOC | Northrop Grumman Corp. Industrials | 0.24% | 17.7x | 6/9 |
| 13 | H11356104 | Bunge Global S.A. | 0.24% | — | — |
| 14 | CHRW | C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. Industrials | 0.24% | 36.2x | 7/9 |
| 15 | CF | CF Industries Holdings, Inc. Basic Materials | 0.24% | 10.1x | 8/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how RSP’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 4.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SNDK | 0.48% | 685,342 | $394.9M |
| 2 | MU | 0.31% | 605,081 | $251.0M |
| 3 | MRNA | 0.30% | 5,490,716 | $242.0M |
| 4 | LRCX | 0.27% | 947,755 | $221.3M |
| 5 | WDC | 0.27% | 875,923 | $219.2M |
| 6 | G7997R103 | 0.27% | 533,588 | $217.5M |
| 7 | LMT | 0.26% | 340,493 | $215.9M |
| 8 | HII | 0.25% | 493,545 | $207.5M |
| 9 | FCX | 0.25% | 3,432,526 | $206.7M |
| 10 | ALB | 0.25% | 1,197,026 | $204.2M |
| 11 | V7780T103 | 0.24% | 612,714 | $198.9M |
| 12 | NOC | 0.24% | 287,207 | $198.8M |
| 13 | H11356104 | 0.24% | 1,742,261 | $198.4M |
| 14 | CHRW | 0.24% | 1,006,276 | $196.2M |
| 15 | CF | 0.24% | 2,094,128 | $195.2M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove RSP Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How RSP’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($84.77B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.