RSP(RSP)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio exhibits a moderate tilt towards Technology, which accounts for approximately one-sixth of its holdings, and is also notable for its relatively high allocation to Industrials. This suggests that the fund's manager has taken a more aggressive stance in these areas, potentially positioning it to benefit from growth-oriented sectors. The overall valuation posture appears elevated, with a weighted P/E ratio exceeding 22x and a weighted P/B ratio of around 7.3x, indicating that investors are willing to pay a premium for the underlying assets.
The concentration risk is moderate due to the presence of several large-cap technology stocks, including Intel (INTC) and AMD, which together account for less than 1% of the portfolio. However, the fund's sector mix deviates significantly from the broader market, with Technology and Industrials overweighted by roughly 5-6 percentage points relative to their respective weights in the overall market. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio would likely involve sustained growth in technology and industrial production, while an unfavorable scenario could be characterized by a slowdown in these areas or rising interest rates that disproportionately impact higher-multiple sectors such as Technology.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 07:21:33.778064+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100The investment theme implied by the ticker RSP is typically associated with a broad market index strategy, specifically tracking the S&P 500 ex-Energy sector. The provided holdings list and sector breakdown confirm this alignment rather than contradicting it; there are no thematic outliers or unrelated mega-cap stocks that suggest a deviation from its benchmark. Instead of focusing on a specific industry like technology or healthcare, the fund maintains a diversified exposure across twelve distinct sectors, with weights in industrials, technology, financial services, and consumer staples closely mirroring the composition of a broad U.S. equity index after removing energy companies. The presence of holdings such as LMT, HII, and NOC within industrials alongside tech names like SNDK and MU demonstrates a standard market-cap weighted approach rather than a concentrated thematic bet.
Concentration risk appears minimal given that the top ten positions collectively represent only 2.9% of assets under management, indicating a highly diversified portfolio where no single holding or small group can disproportionately influence performance. The sector coherence is consistent with an ex-energy broad market strategy, as energy constitutes just 4.6% of the total allocation while other major sectors like industrials and technology hover around 12%, reflecting their typical weighting in the broader U.S. economy minus that specific industry. This structure differentiates the fund from a standard all-cap index by excluding one entire sector, yet it remains fundamentally similar to broad market benchmarks in terms of risk profile and diversification. The data suggests the vehicle functions as intended for investors seeking wide exposure with a single-sector omission rather than pursuing active thematic differentiation or high-concentration strategies.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-18 20:08:44.248867+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of RSP presents a market-capitalization weighted profile that heavily favors large-cap equities, as evidenced by the significant representation in Technology and Financial Services. While these two sectors combined account for nearly 24% of the portfolio, they are not the dominant forces; instead, Industrials lead at 12.7%, followed closely by Healthcare at 9.6%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on broad market exposure rather than a specific thematic tilt toward growth or value within any single industry group. The presence of substantial weightings across defensive sectors like Consumer Defensive and Utilities indicates that the fund is designed to capture overall economic performance while maintaining some inherent stability through established, mature industries.
Concentration risk appears mitigated by an exceptionally low top-10 holding concentration of 2.9%, which implies a highly diversified structure where no single stock exerts disproportionate influence on returns. The uniformity in weighting among the largest positions further supports this observation, suggesting that performance will be driven more by aggregate sector movements than idiosyncratic company outcomes. This approach aligns with a passive strategy aiming to replicate broad market indices rather than seeking alpha through active stock selection or concentrated bets on specific leaders.
In terms of factor tilts, the allocation does not exhibit an aggressive bias toward high-growth sectors relative to their historical averages in many cases, nor does it aggressively underweight them. The balanced spread across Industrials and Consumer Cyclical stocks hints at a neutral stance regarding value versus growth factors within those areas. Ultimately, the fund's structure reflects a commitment to broad diversification with minimal sector-specific overexposure, positioning it as a tool for capturing general market beta rather than specific industry or factor-driven returns.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 05:06:40.381073+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share RSP's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of RSP's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 474 | 93.9% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 475 | 93.8% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 471 | 93.1% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 465 | 91.6% |
| IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF | $762B | 0.03% | 465 | 91.3% |
94% of RSP's portfolio by weight is also held by SCHB. When SCHB receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging RSP's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofRSP's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 87% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 40% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside RSP collectively pay out 44% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 29% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryRSP is up 17.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +4.7%. The remaining +12.6% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 39% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of RSP's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of RSP's analyzed weight, 41% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 59% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 33% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
RSP has a Passive Crowding Score of 46/100. On average, 13.9% of the market capitalization of RSP's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 36 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | Intel Corp. Technology | 0.38% | — | 6/9 |
| 2 | G7997R103 | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 0.34% | — | — |
| 3 | AMD | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Technology | 0.33% | 166.9x | 7/9 |
| 4 | ON | ON Semiconductor Corp. Technology | 0.33% | 64.7x | 3/9 |
| 5 | SNDK | Sandisk Corp. Technology | 0.32% | 48.3x | 5/9 |
| 6 | WDC | Western Digital Corp. Technology | 0.31% | 27.9x | 6/9 |
| 7 | 171779309 | Ciena Corp. | 0.30% | — | — |
| 8 | MPWR | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. Technology | 0.29% | 93.4x | 5/9 |
| 9 | CNC | Centene Corp. Healthcare | 0.29% | — | 3/9 |
| 10 | N6596X109 | NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 0.28% | — | — |
| 11 | DELL | Dell Technologies Inc. Technology | 0.27% | 31.2x | 6/9 |
| 12 | TXN | Texas Instruments Inc. Technology | 0.27% | 49.7x | 7/9 |
| 13 | MCHP | Microchip Technology Inc. Technology | 0.27% | 368.0x | 6/9 |
| 14 | HUM | Humana Inc. Healthcare | 0.27% | 41.3x | 3/9 |
| 15 | 55024U109 | Lumentum Holdings Inc. | 0.26% | — | — |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how RSP’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
2026-07-18
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
2026-07-17
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
2026-07-16
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
2026-07-15
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
2026-07-14
15 holdings · 4.5% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INTC | 0.38% | 3,515,969 | $332.2M |
| 2 | G7997R103 | 0.34% | 437,367 | $294.6M |
| 3 | AMD | 0.33% | 824,312 | $292.2M |
| 4 | ON | 0.33% | 2,849,790 | $287.3M |
| 5 | SNDK | 0.32% | 257,385 | $282.2M |
| 6 | WDC | 0.31% | 627,720 | $272.8M |
| 7 | 171779309 | 0.30% | 496,183 | $261.8M |
| 8 | MPWR | 0.29% | 157,414 | $254.1M |
| 9 | CNC | 0.29% | 4,705,050 | $252.6M |
| 10 | N6596X109 | 0.28% | 843,826 | $247.7M |
| 11 | DELL | 0.27% | 1,145,412 | $239.3M |
| 12 | TXN | 0.27% | 848,921 | $238.6M |
| 13 | MCHP | 0.27% | 2,564,562 | $238.3M |
| 14 | HUM | 0.27% | 986,831 | $233.3M |
| 15 | 55024U109 | 0.26% | 251,108 | $226.6M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove RSP Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How RSP’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($91.31B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.