Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicCDNS trades at 87.8x earnings — a 35% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 11.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $100 implies 65% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedCadence Design Systems exhibits robust fundamental quality characterized by a substantial ROIC-WACC spread of +4.3%, indicating capital allocation that significantly outpaces the cost of equity, despite a high valuation multiple. The DuPont decomposition reveals an ROE of 20.3% driven primarily by exceptional net margins at 20.9%, supported by moderate asset turnover and leverage rather than financial engineering. Creditworthiness appears strong with an Altman Z-Score of 12.8, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.44 suggests a low probability of earnings manipulation; however, the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicates minor weaknesses in recent fundamental shifts compared to a perfect score.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models. The current P/E ratio of 68.5x trades at approximately 20% above both historical norms and the sector average of 42.2x, reflecting aggressive growth expectations embedded in the price. A DCF analysis implies that fair value sits at $100, suggesting a potential downside gap of -63.9% from current levels if implied free cash flow growth assumptions hold true over the next decade. This steep discount to intrinsic value contrasts sharply with the market's pricing for 23.7% annualized FCF growth and the stock's heavy exposure to the Growth factor, as evidenced by a Value Factor (HML) of -0.234.
Risk assessment highlights specific factor exposures that may pressure future returns relative to broad benchmarks. The negative Profitability Factor (RMW) score of -0.326 signals that recent profitability trends are lagging behind the sector's median, while Fama-French alpha remains modest at 0.43% annually. Compounding these fundamental headwinds is notable insider activity, with $2,978,762 in net selling over the last 90 days, which often precedes periods of elevated volatility or price correction in equity markets.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 14% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9% | 11% | 13% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $118 | $91 | $74 |
| 3% | $134 | $100 | $79 |
| 4% | $156 | $111 | $85 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $416.39.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $100 (-65.5%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 21% below its 5-year average P/E of 82.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedCadence Design Systems is currently trading at $347.24 within the technology sector, a position that reflects its status as a leader in electronic design automation tools. The technical configuration suggests a market environment where price action has stabilized after periods of significant fluctuation, indicating that recent momentum may be more structural than fragile given the company's consistent historical performance and strong order backlog. However, without specific volatility metrics or drawdown data provided in the input, it remains difficult to quantify the precise risk dynamics; the absence of extreme deviation signals could imply a consolidation phase where capital is repositioning rather than aggressively chasing gains. The fundamental backdrop for CDNS typically involves recurring revenue streams and high switching costs, which often provide a floor against sharp downside moves during broader market corrections. If current price levels are holding steady relative to key moving averages or support zones not explicitly detailed here, the asset might be exhibiting resilience characteristic of mature growth stocks rather than speculative tech plays prone to rapid drawdowns. Conversely, any sudden breach of established technical boundaries could signal a shift where fragility returns, especially if macroeconomic headwinds impact enterprise IT spending more broadly across the technology sector. Ultimately, the interplay between the current valuation and underlying business fundamentals creates a complex risk profile that requires close monitoring of volume profiles and broader sector trends. While the stock appears to have maintained its trajectory in recent sessions, investors must remain vigilant for any divergence between price action and earnings expectations, as such discrepancies often precede periods of
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SMH or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CDNS shares regardless of Cadence Design Systems, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $13.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to CDNS through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Cadence Design Systems, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CDNS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CDNS Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 CDNS shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.7% of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and 0.9% of the VFQY (VFQY). Across 30 tracked ETFs, approximately 44M shares (16.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest CDNS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CDNS Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over the past year sits near $297.39 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $416.39 trades 40.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
CDNS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Cadence Design Systems, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. converts 85% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 200,814 | $354.55 | $71.2M |
| 2026-05-12 | 1,979 | $364.20 | $720,751.8 |
| 2026-05-11 | 46,754 | $362.70 | $17.0M |
| 2026-05-07 | 88 | $354.90 | $31,231.2 |
| 2026-05-06 | 5 | $353.63 | $1,768.15 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,526 | $340.94 | $861,214.44 |
| 2026-04-30 | 4 | $329.95 | $1,319.8 |
| 2026-04-29 | 185,498 | $325.31 | $60.3M |
| 2026-04-28 | 190,582 | $336.54 | $64.1M |
| 2026-04-27 | 126,961 | $332.89 | $42.3M |
| 2026-04-24 | 438,226 | $314.33 | $137.7M |
| 2026-04-23 | 447,264 | $331.61 | $148.3M |
| 2026-04-22 | 603,974 | $325.84 | $196.8M |
| 2026-04-21 | 555,188 | $318.50 | $176.8M |
| 2026-04-20 | 256,087 | $311.03 | $79.7M |
| 2026-04-16 | 58 | $304.10 | $17,637.8 |
| 2026-04-13 | 3,215 | $265.66 | $854,096.9 |
| 2026-04-10 | 5 | $281.01 | $1,405.05 |
| 2026-04-08 | 1 | $279.48 | $279.48 |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,133 | $278.72 | $315,789.76 |
| 2026-03-27 | 27,250 | $280.62 | $7.6M |
| 2026-03-25 | 27 | $284.32 | $7,676.64 |
| 2026-03-24 | 268,231 | $292.52 | $78.5M |
| 2026-03-19 | 78,161 | $289.64 | $22.6M |
| 2026-03-18 | 93,012 | $293.75 | $27.3M |
| 2026-03-17 | 69 | $292.72 | $20,197.68 |
| 2026-03-10 | 442,106 | $298.05 | $131.8M |
| 2026-03-09 | 780,718 | $296.94 | $231.8M |
| 2026-03-06 | 605,256 | $299.84 | $181.5M |
| 2026-03-05 | 179,534 | $305.43 | $54.8M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SNPS | 0.698 | 0.766 | Moderate |
| OKTA | 0.544 | 0.500 | Moderate |
| TRMB | 0.522 | 0.529 | Moderate |
| RBRK | 0.505 | 0.538 | Moderate |
| CRWD | 0.504 | 0.532 | Moderate |
| TENB | 0.482 | 0.558 | Moderate |
| KKR | 0.476 | 0.486 | Moderate |
| SNOW | 0.470 | 0.587 | Moderate |
| NOW | 0.466 | 0.467 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare CDNS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.