Trimble Inc. (TRMB)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 29.5x earnings — a 55% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — TRMB is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 3.7. DCF fair value of $13 implies 80% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedTrimble Inc. presents a fundamental profile characterized by high-quality profitability metrics tempered by declining revenue momentum and modest capital efficiency. While the company maintains robust gross margins at 69.1% and solid net margins of 11.8%, these are supported by significant leverage, as evidenced by an equity multiplier of 1.60x within its DuPont ROE decomposition. This leverage structure drives a return on equity of 7.3%, yet the underlying capital generation remains constrained with a low ROIC of 5.9% and negative revenue growth of -2.6%. The Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals moderate financial strength, while the Beneish M-Score of -2.26 suggests earnings are unlikely to be materially manipulated; however, the combination of shrinking top-line performance and sub-par capital returns indicates a business in transition rather than one expanding its economic moat.
Valuation metrics suggest the market price remains significantly detached from intrinsic value models based on current free cash flow assumptions. Trading at 37.0x earnings, Trimble commands a premium relative to the sector average of 56.8x is incorrect; it actually trades at a discount compared to its peer group, though this valuation gap appears unjustified given the negative growth trajectory and low ROIC. More critically, discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value of $13, representing an approximate -80.3% downside from current levels if the model's 25.9% ten-year free cash flow growth assumption holds true against reality. This stark divergence between implied valuation multiples and DCF-derived pricing suggests that either market expectations for future scalability are overly optimistic or the stock is priced as a distressed asset despite its high gross margins.
Recent insider activity adds another layer of caution to the risk-reward assessment, with $1,672,651 in net selling observed over the past 90 days. This outflow aligns with the deteriorating revenue trend and low ROIC, potentially indicating management's lack of confidence in near-term turnaround prospects or a desire to reduce exposure at current levels. While the negative Beneish score mitigates concerns regarding earnings quality, the convergence of insider selling, shrinking revenues, and a valuation that implies substantial downside relative to DCF models creates a challenging setup for investors seeking capital appreciation without significant risk tolerance.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -3% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.4% | 13.4% | 15.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $16 | $12 | $9 |
| 3% | $18 | $13 | $10 |
| 4% | $20 | $15 | $11 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $57.74.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $13 (-80.3%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 5% above its 5-year average P/E of 35.0x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKX or ARKQ, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TRMB shares regardless of Trimble Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to TRMB through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Trimble Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Trimble Inc. (TRMB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ROCKET LAB (RKLB UQ) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TRMB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TRMB Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 TRMB shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Trimble Inc. (TRMB) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.1% of the ARKX (ARKX) and 1.9% of the ARKQ (ARKQ). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 39M shares (16.5% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest TRMB Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TRMB Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Trimble Inc. over the past year sits near $79.69 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $57.74 sits 27.5% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
TRMB Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Trimble Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Trimble Inc. converts 46% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 54% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-7.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 649 | $54.90 | $35,630.1 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $68.42 | $136.84 |
| 2026-04-29 | 46 | $66.64 | $3,065.44 |
| 2026-04-27 | 248 | $67.35 | $16,702.8 |
| 2026-04-21 | 43 | $69.50 | $2,988.5 |
| 2026-04-20 | 17 | $69.29 | $1,177.93 |
| 2026-04-17 | 5 | $67.67 | $338.35 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $66.89 | $66.89 |
| 2026-04-10 | 8,100 | $65.42 | $529,902 |
| 2026-04-06 | 2 | $65.12 | $130.24 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2 | $62.54 | $125.08 |
| 2026-03-27 | 2 | $65.45 | $130.9 |
| 2026-03-26 | 2,319 | $65.87 | $152,752.53 |
| 2026-03-25 | 24 | $65.38 | $1,569.12 |
| 2026-03-23 | 3,048 | $65.71 | $200,284.08 |
| 2026-03-16 | 31 | $66.47 | $2,060.57 |
| 2026-03-12 | 39,445 | $67.60 | $2.7M |
| 2026-03-05 | 27 | $69.92 | $1,887.84 |
| 2026-02-19 | 36 | $66.91 | $2,408.76 |
| 2026-02-18 | 277 | $65.63 | $18,179.51 |
| 2026-02-06 | 9,528 | $63.98 | $609,601.44 |
| 2026-02-05 | 120 | $65.04 | $7,804.8 |
| 2026-01-26 | 1 | $71.19 | $71.19 |
| 2026-01-14 | 17,578 | $80.24 | $1.4M |
| 2026-01-09 | 1 | $79.51 | $79.51 |
| 2026-01-06 | 67 | $79.27 | $5,311.09 |
| 2026-01-02 | 212 | $78.35 | $16,610.2 |
| 2025-12-22 | 207 | $80.88 | $16,742.16 |
| 2025-12-01 | 100 | $81.42 | $8,142 |
| 2025-11-28 | 11 | $81.27 | $893.97 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| KKR | 0.676 | 0.599 | Moderate |
| MC | 0.624 | 0.577 | Moderate |
| BX | 0.622 | 0.511 | Moderate |
| BEN | 0.620 | 0.584 | Moderate |
| TROW | 0.615 | 0.570 | Moderate |
| IVZ | 0.606 | 0.626 | Moderate |
| BLK | 0.584 | 0.499 | Moderate |
| STT | 0.578 | 0.533 | Moderate |
| ROK | 0.575 | 0.494 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TRMB to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.