Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicMPWR trades at 112.4x earnings — a 73% premium to its sector average of 65.0x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 62.8. DCF fair value of $319 implies 77% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedMonolithic Power Systems demonstrates robust fundamental economics driven primarily by exceptional operating leverage rather than asset efficiency or financial leverage. The DuPont decomposition reveals that a 17.6% ROE is almost entirely fueled by an industry-leading 22.3% net margin, while the low equity multiplier of 1.19x indicates conservative balance sheet management and minimal reliance on debt to boost returns. Although the positive Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggests moderate financial strength relative to peers, this is juxtaposed against a narrow ROIC-WACC spread of only +1.1%, implying that current capital allocation yields barely exceed the cost of equity. Despite an Altman Z-Score of 48.5 indicating low bankruptcy risk and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.50 signaling minimal earnings manipulation concerns, the tight return gap suggests limited excess value creation from core operations at present valuations.
Valuation metrics indicate significant market divergence between historical norms and intrinsic worth estimates. The current P/E ratio of 87.0x stands more than double the sector average of 42.2x, reflecting aggressive pricing for future growth expectations rather than current earnings power. A DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $317 with an implied downside of -71.0%, implying that the market is currently pricing in sustained free cash flow growth rates averaging 34.8% over the next decade—a scenario difficult to sustain indefinitely given cyclical semiconductor dynamics. This extreme premium highlights a disconnect where investors are willing to pay for high-growth narratives despite limited margin of safety relative to calculated intrinsic value.
Risk and return factors present a mixed picture characterized by strong momentum but elevated valuation risk. The stock exhibits substantial Fama-French alpha of 40.33% annually, driven largely by its growth tilt (HML factor: -0.578) rather than profitability premiums (RMW factor: 0.143), suggesting the market rewards expansion over value characteristics here. However, this bullish momentum is counterbalanced by significant insider activity, with $294 million in net selling over the past 90 days, which often precedes price corrections when management lacks confidence at current levels. The combination of extreme valuation multiples and heavy insider distribution warrants caution regarding potential mean reversion despite the company's high profitability metrics.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 26% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.9% | 13.9% | 15.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $364 | $300 | $255 |
| 3% | $394 | $319 | $267 |
| 4% | $432 | $342 | $283 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $1624.99.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $319 (-76.8%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 39% above its 5-year average P/E of 75.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedMicrochip Technology (MPWR) is trading below its 50-day moving average but above the 200-day line, suggesting a short-term downtrend amid potential longer-term support. The RSI at 40 indicates the stock may be approaching oversold territory, which could imply some near-term buying pressure if sentiment shifts favorably.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | $2.0000 | +28.2% |
| 2025-12-31 | $1.5600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-30 | $1.5600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-30 | $1.5600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-31 | $1.5600 | +24.8% |
| 2024-12-31 | $1.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-30 | $1.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-28 | $1.2500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-27 | $1.2500 | +25.0% |
| 2023-12-28 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-28 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-29 | $1.0000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SOXX or RDVY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MPWR shares regardless of Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $13.9B of passive capital is structurally linked to MPWR through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MPWR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 35 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MPWR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 MPWR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.8% of the iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) and 2.6% of the RDVY (RDVY). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 10M shares (19.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest MPWR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MPWR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. over the past year sits near $943.97 (17% of 252-day volume). The current price of $1624.99 trades 72.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (17% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
MPWR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. converts 85% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 3 | $1650.35 | $4,951.05 |
| 2026-05-07 | 170 | $1652.35 | $280,899.5 |
| 2026-05-01 | 1,894 | $1614.41 | $3.1M |
| 2026-04-24 | 421 | $1592.17 | $670,303.57 |
| 2026-04-20 | 282 | $1468.35 | $414,074.7 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1,210 | $1353.00 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-15 | 1 | $1363.42 | $1,363.42 |
| 2026-04-10 | 7,315 | $1334.21 | $9.8M |
| 2026-04-02 | 199 | $1119.51 | $222,782.49 |
| 2026-04-01 | 242 | $1093.35 | $264,590.7 |
| 2026-03-31 | 283 | $1002.34 | $283,662.22 |
| 2026-03-26 | 261 | $1118.66 | $291,970.26 |
| 2026-03-25 | 600 | $1101.59 | $660,954 |
| 2026-03-24 | 600 | $1076.35 | $645,810 |
| 2026-03-23 | 800 | $1068.85 | $855,080 |
| 2026-03-20 | 147 | $1092.69 | $160,625.43 |
| 2026-03-19 | 16,276 | $1075.29 | $17.5M |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,930 | $1077.40 | $2.1M |
| 2026-03-13 | 311 | $1033.88 | $321,536.68 |
| 2026-03-09 | 72 | $1023.16 | $73,667.52 |
| 2026-03-04 | 7,918 | $1074.37 | $8.5M |
| 2026-03-03 | 2 | $1142.58 | $2,285.16 |
| 2026-02-19 | 8 | $1188.32 | $9,506.56 |
| 2026-02-12 | 588 | $1196.73 | $703,677.24 |
| 2026-02-11 | 604 | $1142.02 | $689,780.08 |
| 2026-02-10 | 590 | $1206.18 | $711,646.2 |
| 2026-02-09 | 603 | $1229.82 | $741,581.46 |
| 2026-01-29 | 76 | $1161.78 | $88,295.28 |
| 2026-01-28 | 840 | $1095.49 | $920,211.6 |
| 2026-01-27 | 79,683 | $1068.14 | $85.1M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| LRCX | 0.726 | 0.781 | High co-movement |
| KLAC | 0.702 | 0.743 | High co-movement |
| AMAT | 0.701 | 0.753 | High co-movement |
| ADI | 0.686 | 0.706 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.666 | 0.741 | Moderate |
| NXPI | 0.660 | 0.613 | Moderate |
| NL0009538784 | 0.658 | 0.609 | Moderate |
| ASML | 0.647 | 0.697 | Moderate |
| USN070592100 | 0.646 | 0.696 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare MPWR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.