KFY (KFY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a structural constraint, as the return on invested capital of 9.9% falls short of the weighted average cost of capital at 12.0%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction despite reported profitability metrics. This apparent paradox is resolved through DuPont decomposition, where an equity multiplier of 2.06x leverages thin net margins of 8.9% to generate a return on equity of 13.1%; however, the underlying asset turnover remains modest at 0.72x. While qualitative integrity scores remain robust with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score indicating low earnings manipulation risk, an Altman Z-Score of 2.8 flags moderate distress potential that warrants scrutiny given the contraction in revenue growth to -1.2% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics currently reflect significant market skepticism relative to historical norms and sector peers, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.5x trading well below implied fair value derived from discounted cash flow models projecting at $39 per share. This divergence implies the market is pricing in persistent headwinds regarding growth sustainability rather than current profitability, as the DCF model assumes future recovery not yet realized in the declining top line. The disconnect between a seemingly undervalued multiple and negative capital returns suggests that investors are heavily discounting the quality of earnings until operational leverage improves or asset turnover accelerates beyond its 0.72x baseline.
Insider activity over the past ninety days has remained neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear directional signal from management regarding the company's strategic outlook amidst these fundamental pressures. The combination of negative capital returns and moderate financial distress indicators creates a risk-reward profile where upside potential is theoretically supported by valuation gaps, yet execution risks remain elevated due to shrinking revenues and inefficient capital deployment relative to investor expectations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10% | 12% | 14% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $44 | $37 | $32 |
| 3% | $48 | $39 | $34 |
| 4% | $52 | $42 | $35 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $39 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KFY shares regardless of KFY's individual fundamentals. We estimate $124M of passive capital is structurally linked to KFY through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on KFY's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in KFY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If KFY (KFY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KFY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
KFY Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest KFY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
KFY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does KFY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
KFY converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 723 | $64.51 | $46,640.73 |
| 2026-05-05 | 94 | $66.46 | $6,247.24 |
| 2026-04-28 | 46 | $66.12 | $3,041.52 |
| 2026-04-21 | 85 | $66.63 | $5,663.55 |
| 2026-04-09 | 11,029 | $63.90 | $704,753.1 |
| 2026-03-27 | 44 | $64.06 | $2,818.64 |
| 2026-03-26 | 5,670 | $63.01 | $357,266.7 |
| 2026-03-25 | 1,691 | $62.69 | $106,008.79 |
| 2026-03-23 | 21 | $61.76 | $1,296.96 |
| 2026-03-18 | 7,800 | $61.26 | $477,828 |
| 2026-02-03 | 198 | $70.08 | $13,875.84 |
| 2026-01-23 | 3,798 | $68.74 | $261,074.52 |
| 2026-01-12 | 880 | $68.98 | $60,702.4 |
| 2026-01-09 | 1 | $68.04 | $68.04 |
| 2026-01-05 | 4,571 | $66.39 | $303,468.69 |
| 2025-12-30 | 106 | $67.06 | $7,108.36 |
| 2025-12-29 | 248 | $67.10 | $16,640.8 |
| 2025-12-26 | 68 | $66.65 | $4,532.2 |
| 2025-12-19 | 2,271 | $69.30 | $157,380.3 |
| 2025-12-12 | 4 | $68.70 | $274.8 |
| 2025-11-24 | 82 | $64.88 | $5,320.16 |
| 2025-10-31 | 59 | $65.39 | $3,858.01 |
| 2025-10-30 | 98 | $66.50 | $6,517 |
| 2025-10-21 | 48 | $68.97 | $3,310.56 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare KFY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.