KFY (KFY)

$3.3B
Market Cap
12.5
P/E Ratio
1.33
Beta
3.53%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 2.8 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.57 CleanROIC−WACC -2.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.8.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency presents a structural constraint, as the return on invested capital of 9.9% falls short of the weighted average cost of capital at 12.0%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction despite reported profitability metrics. This apparent paradox is resolved through DuPont decomposition, where an equity multiplier of 2.06x leverages thin net margins of 8.9% to generate a return on equity of 13.1%; however, the underlying asset turnover remains modest at 0.72x. While qualitative integrity scores remain robust with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score indicating low earnings manipulation risk, an Altman Z-Score of 2.8 flags moderate distress potential that warrants scrutiny given the contraction in revenue growth to -1.2% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics currently reflect significant market skepticism relative to historical norms and sector peers, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.5x trading well below implied fair value derived from discounted cash flow models projecting at $39 per share. This divergence implies the market is pricing in persistent headwinds regarding growth sustainability rather than current profitability, as the DCF model assumes future recovery not yet realized in the declining top line. The disconnect between a seemingly undervalued multiple and negative capital returns suggests that investors are heavily discounting the quality of earnings until operational leverage improves or asset turnover accelerates beyond its 0.72x baseline.

Insider activity over the past ninety days has remained neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear directional signal from management regarding the company's strategic outlook amidst these fundamental pressures. The combination of negative capital returns and moderate financial distress indicators creates a risk-reward profile where upside potential is theoretically supported by valuation gaps, yet execution risks remain elevated due to shrinking revenues and inefficient capital deployment relative to investor expectations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →10%12%14%
2%$44$37$32
3%$48$39$34
4%$52$42$35

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $39 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.8
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.57
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

88.5%
Gross Margin
8.9%
Net Margin
9.9%
ROIC
12.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.1%— Negative spread.
-1.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+45.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
301.9M
Free Cash Flow
28%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

8.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.72x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.06x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
13.1%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.06x
Debt / Equity
1.83x
Current Ratio
17.9x
Interest Coverage
-1.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
11.25%
FCF Yield
445.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.26
Act: $1.32
+4.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.24
Act: $1.31
+6.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.31
Act: $1.33
+1.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.24
Act: $1.28
+3.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.62
Price/Book
546618
Avg Volume
$78.50
52W High
$58.95
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$124M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding KFY
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$204B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KFY shares regardless of KFY's individual fundamentals. We estimate $124M of passive capital is structurally linked to KFY through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on KFY's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in KFY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

KFY Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
KFYEpicenterVYMETFVBRETFVTWOETFCATLow RiskGELow RiskGEVLow RiskRTXMed RiskBELow Risk
KFY Price Drop (%)0

If KFY (KFY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with KFY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

KFY Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
KFY

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

KFY Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does KFY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$302M
EBITDA
$446M
FCF Conversion
68%
Reinvestment Rate
32%
68% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.1%

KFY converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14723$64.51$46,640.73
2026-05-0594$66.46$6,247.24
2026-04-2846$66.12$3,041.52
2026-04-2185$66.63$5,663.55
2026-04-0911,029$63.90$704,753.1
2026-03-2744$64.06$2,818.64
2026-03-265,670$63.01$357,266.7
2026-03-251,691$62.69$106,008.79
2026-03-2321$61.76$1,296.96
2026-03-187,800$61.26$477,828
2026-02-03198$70.08$13,875.84
2026-01-233,798$68.74$261,074.52
2026-01-12880$68.98$60,702.4
2026-01-091$68.04$68.04
2026-01-054,571$66.39$303,468.69
2025-12-30106$67.06$7,108.36
2025-12-29248$67.10$16,640.8
2025-12-2668$66.65$4,532.2
2025-12-192,271$69.30$157,380.3
2025-12-124$68.70$274.8
2025-11-2482$64.88$5,320.16
2025-10-3159$65.39$3,858.01
2025-10-3098$66.50$6,517
2025-10-2148$68.97$3,310.56

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare KFY to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.