MCY (MCY)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.6.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe equity economics present a distinct dichotomy between capital efficiency and profitability leverage. While the Return on Invested Capital sits at 5.7%, suggesting modest value creation relative to total deployed capital, the DuPont decomposition reveals that earnings power is primarily driven by high financial leverage rather than operational margin expansion or asset turnover; specifically, an equity multiplier of 3.96x amplifies a net margin of only 9.0% and an asset turnover of 0.63x to generate a 22.4% Return on Equity. This capital structure is reinforced by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating moderate financial strength without the robustness typically associated with high-quality compounders, even as revenue growth accelerates at a 9.4% year-over-year pace.
Valuation metrics currently diverge significantly from intrinsic value models and historical norms. The stock trades at an 8.9x price-to-earnings multiple, which appears compressed relative to the implied growth trajectory embedded in recent performance data. However, this discount is counterbalanced by a Discounted Cash Flow analysis projecting a fair value of $680, implying that the market may be pricing in slower future growth or higher risk premiums than current fundamentals suggest. The gap between the observed P/E and the DCF-derived valuation indicates potential upside if execution aligns with cash flow assumptions, though the narrow ROIC spread limits the margin for error in long-term compounding scenarios.
Insider activity remains neutral over the past 90 days, offering no clear directional signal regarding management's private view on near-term prospects. Without additional data points such as Fama-French alpha or specific sector risk deltas, the investment case rests entirely on whether the market can sustain the current revenue expansion while managing the inherent risks of elevated leverage and suboptimal capital returns.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $830 | $609 | $477 |
| 3% | $975 | $680 | $518 |
| 4% | $1193 | $775 | $569 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $680 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MCY shares regardless of MCY's individual fundamentals. We estimate $61M of passive capital is structurally linked to MCY through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MCY's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MCY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MCY (MCY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies OSCAR HEALTH INC CLASS A (OSCR) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MCY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MCY Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest MCY Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MCY Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MCY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MCY converts 134% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 133 | $99.05 | $13,173.65 |
| 2026-05-07 | 132 | $96.02 | $12,674.64 |
| 2026-05-05 | 1,884 | $95.49 | $179,903.16 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,751 | $95.65 | $167,483.15 |
| 2026-04-29 | 3,036 | $98.23 | $298,226.28 |
| 2026-04-28 | 2 | $98.15 | $196.3 |
| 2026-04-24 | 9 | $97.64 | $878.76 |
| 2026-04-23 | 1 | $96.23 | $96.23 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1 | $93.54 | $93.54 |
| 2026-03-06 | 1 | $91.23 | $91.23 |
| 2026-03-05 | 26 | $93.05 | $2,419.3 |
| 2026-02-27 | 58 | $89.85 | $5,211.3 |
| 2026-02-18 | 14 | $96.19 | $1,346.66 |
| 2026-02-09 | 1,429 | $95.19 | $136,026.51 |
| 2026-02-06 | 11 | $93.60 | $1,029.6 |
| 2026-01-20 | 1,555 | $91.09 | $141,644.95 |
| 2026-01-13 | 122 | $90.36 | $11,023.92 |
| 2026-01-08 | 11 | $89.35 | $982.85 |
| 2025-12-24 | 13 | $94.93 | $1,234.09 |
| 2025-12-23 | 4,300 | $95.28 | $409,704 |
| 2025-12-22 | 4,350 | $93.62 | $407,247 |
| 2025-12-11 | 138 | $90.32 | $12,464.16 |
| 2025-11-28 | 12 | $93.36 | $1,120.32 |
| 2025-11-26 | 17 | $93.07 | $1,582.19 |
| 2025-11-25 | 12 | $92.98 | $1,115.76 |
| 2025-11-21 | 706 | $88.69 | $62,615.14 |
| 2025-11-06 | 12 | $81.75 | $981 |
| 2025-10-27 | 204 | $79.26 | $16,169.04 |
| 2025-10-21 | 2 | $79.51 | $159.02 |
| 2025-10-08 | 726 | $85.60 | $62,145.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare MCY to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.