MCY (MCY)

$4.8B
Market Cap
8.9
P/E Ratio
0.94
Beta
1.48%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 1.6 DistressROIC−WACC -4.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.6.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The equity economics present a distinct dichotomy between capital efficiency and profitability leverage. While the Return on Invested Capital sits at 5.7%, suggesting modest value creation relative to total deployed capital, the DuPont decomposition reveals that earnings power is primarily driven by high financial leverage rather than operational margin expansion or asset turnover; specifically, an equity multiplier of 3.96x amplifies a net margin of only 9.0% and an asset turnover of 0.63x to generate a 22.4% Return on Equity. This capital structure is reinforced by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating moderate financial strength without the robustness typically associated with high-quality compounders, even as revenue growth accelerates at a 9.4% year-over-year pace.

Valuation metrics currently diverge significantly from intrinsic value models and historical norms. The stock trades at an 8.9x price-to-earnings multiple, which appears compressed relative to the implied growth trajectory embedded in recent performance data. However, this discount is counterbalanced by a Discounted Cash Flow analysis projecting a fair value of $680, implying that the market may be pricing in slower future growth or higher risk premiums than current fundamentals suggest. The gap between the observed P/E and the DCF-derived valuation indicates potential upside if execution aligns with cash flow assumptions, though the narrow ROIC spread limits the margin for error in long-term compounding scenarios.

Insider activity remains neutral over the past 90 days, offering no clear directional signal regarding management's private view on near-term prospects. Without additional data points such as Fama-French alpha or specific sector risk deltas, the investment case rests entirely on whether the market can sustain the current revenue expansion while managing the inherent risks of elevated leverage and suboptimal capital returns.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.9%9.9%11.9%
2%$830$609$477
3%$975$680$518
4%$1193$775$569

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $680 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

9.0%
Net Margin
5.7%
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.2%— Negative spread.
+9.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+15.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.0B
Free Cash Flow
7%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

9.0%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.63x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.96x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
22.4%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.96x
Debt / Equity
24.2x
Interest Coverage
-1.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
25.35%
FCF Yield
767.3M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-4.00
Act: $-2.29
+42.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.30
Act: $2.67
+105.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.15
Act: $3.86
+79.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $2.56
Act: $3.66
+43.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.99
Price/Book
275625
Avg Volume
$100.06
52W High
$47.06
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$61M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding MCY
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$58B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MCY shares regardless of MCY's individual fundamentals. We estimate $61M of passive capital is structurally linked to MCY through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MCY's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MCY to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MCY Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MCYEpicenterVTWOETFSPSMETFVFHETFOSCRUnknownSPNTHigh RiskSANMMed RiskLNCHigh RiskPLMRHigh Risk
MCY Price Drop (%)0

If MCY (MCY) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies OSCAR HEALTH INC CLASS A (OSCR) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MCY. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MCY Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MCY

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MCY Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MCY convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.0B
EBITDA
$767M
FCF Conversion
134%
Reinvestment Rate
-34%
134% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
5.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.2%

MCY converts 134% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-12133$99.05$13,173.65
2026-05-07132$96.02$12,674.64
2026-05-051,884$95.49$179,903.16
2026-04-301,751$95.65$167,483.15
2026-04-293,036$98.23$298,226.28
2026-04-282$98.15$196.3
2026-04-249$97.64$878.76
2026-04-231$96.23$96.23
2026-04-161$93.54$93.54
2026-03-061$91.23$91.23
2026-03-0526$93.05$2,419.3
2026-02-2758$89.85$5,211.3
2026-02-1814$96.19$1,346.66
2026-02-091,429$95.19$136,026.51
2026-02-0611$93.60$1,029.6
2026-01-201,555$91.09$141,644.95
2026-01-13122$90.36$11,023.92
2026-01-0811$89.35$982.85
2025-12-2413$94.93$1,234.09
2025-12-234,300$95.28$409,704
2025-12-224,350$93.62$407,247
2025-12-11138$90.32$12,464.16
2025-11-2812$93.36$1,120.32
2025-11-2617$93.07$1,582.19
2025-11-2512$92.98$1,115.76
2025-11-21706$88.69$62,615.14
2025-11-0612$81.75$981
2025-10-27204$79.26$16,169.04
2025-10-212$79.51$159.02
2025-10-08726$85.60$62,145.6

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MCY to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.