NTNX (NTNX)

$10.7B
Market Cap
43.0
P/E Ratio
0.52
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 0.9 DistressBeneish M -3.10 CleanROIC−WACC +1.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 0.9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of NTNX demonstrates a modest spread between its Return on Invested Capital and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital, indicating that value creation is constrained relative to financing costs. Despite this narrow margin, the DuPont decomposition reveals a robust profit engine characterized by an 86.8% gross margin and healthy net margins at 7.4%, supported by accelerating revenue growth of 18.1% year-over-year. Financial integrity metrics present a mixed signal; while the Beneish M-Score of -3.10 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 0.9 signals elevated bankruptcy distress probability, creating tension between operational profitability and balance sheet resilience. The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 further underscores this dichotomy, reflecting a fundamentally sound business with positive trends in leverage and operating cash flow, yet lacking the full nine-point strength required for top-tier fundamental quality.

Valuation metrics indicate that the market is pricing in significant future growth expectations, as evidenced by the current P/E multiple of 43.0x, which likely exceeds historical norms and sector averages given the company's specific risk profile. This premium valuation implies a high bar for earnings acceleration to justify the cost of equity; however, the DCF model calculates a fair value of $150, suggesting that under conservative assumptions regarding terminal growth and discount rates, the current market price may be discounted relative to intrinsic worth if those specific inputs hold true. The disparity between the aggressive multiple and the calculated fair value highlights whether the market is appropriately compensating for the Altman Z-Score risk or overpaying for the high-margin software economics.

The synthesis of these factors presents a complex risk-reward dynamic where strong top-line momentum and low fraud indicators coexist with precarious solvency metrics and inefficient capital returns. Investors must weigh the potential upside from continued revenue expansion against the heightened probability of financial distress indicated by the Altman score, while recognizing that the current valuation leaves little room for error in execution or macroeconomic headwinds.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.7%9.7%
2%$184$126$90
3%$240$150$102
4%$352$187$117

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $150 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.9
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.10
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

86.8%
Gross Margin
7.4%
Net Margin
9.3%
ROIC
7.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +1.6%— Positive spread.
+18.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+251.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
750.2M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

-5.73x
Debt / Equity
1.83x
Current Ratio
26.3x
Interest Coverage
2.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.66%
FCF Yield
292.7M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.38
Act: $0.42
+10.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.33
Act: $0.37
+13.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.41
+0.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.44
Act: $0.56
+28.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

18.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
-12.63
Price/Book
5M
Avg Volume
$83.36
52W High
$35.39
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$767M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding NTNX
0.14%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$531B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NTNX shares regardless of NTNX's individual fundamentals. We estimate $767M of passive capital is structurally linked to NTNX through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NTNX's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in NTNX to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

NTNX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
NTNXEpicenterVBETFVGTETFVXFETFFLEXMed RiskFTILow RiskTWLOLow RiskCWLow RiskNVTLow Risk
NTNX Price Drop (%)0

If NTNX (NTNX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with NTNX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

NTNX Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
NTNX

Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

NTNX Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does NTNX convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$750M
EBITDA
$293M
FCF Conversion
256%
Reinvestment Rate
-156%
256% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
1.6%

NTNX converts 256% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.6% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-087,280$45.93$334,370.4
2026-05-0624$43.43$1,042.32
2026-05-057$43.73$306.11
2026-05-011,760$40.89$71,966.4
2026-04-0224,520$38.04$932,740.8
2026-03-25768$39.31$30,190.08
2026-03-2491$40.39$3,675.49
2026-03-23110$39.48$4,342.8
2026-03-192,721$41.47$112,839.87
2026-03-1368,246$39.13$2.7M
2026-02-261,566$38.44$60,197.04
2026-02-17927$41.76$38,711.52
2026-02-06130$38.39$4,990.7
2026-01-272,807$43.37$121,739.59
2025-12-29983$52.84$51,941.72
2025-12-2342,049$52.94$2.2M
2025-12-19221,589$50.69$11.2M
2025-12-18142,741$50.20$7.2M
2025-12-17400$48.27$19,308
2025-12-1620$47.76$955.2
2025-12-10197$47.23$9,304.31
2025-12-0943$47.39$2,037.77
2025-12-0540$47.11$1,884.4
2025-12-041,763$47.45$83,654.35
2025-12-0313,740$46.57$639,871.8
2025-11-2665,686$58.77$3.9M
2025-11-2543,446$58.32$2.5M
2025-11-2026$60.39$1,570.14
2025-11-18497$64.60$32,106.2
2025-11-1027$69.62$1,879.74

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare NTNX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.