PBI (PBI)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.88 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$44$31$23
3%$53$35$25
4%$66$41$28

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $35 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.88
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

54.1%
Gross Margin
7.6%
Net Margin
14.3%
ROIC
-6.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+171.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
317.0M
Free Cash Flow
16%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

-4.95x
Debt / Equity
0.71x
Current Ratio
2.9x
Interest Coverage
4.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
405.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.27
Act: $0.33
+22.2%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.28
Act: $0.27
-1.8%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.32
Act: $0.31
-1.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.39
Act: $0.45
+16.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$43M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding PBI
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$56B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PBI shares regardless of PBI's individual fundamentals. We estimate $43M of passive capital is structurally linked to PBI through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PBI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in PBI to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PBI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PBIEpicenterVTWOETFSPSMETFSPTMETFCATLow RiskGELow RiskGEVLow RiskRTXMed RiskBELow Risk
PBI Price Drop (%)0

If PBI (PBI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PBI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PBI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
PBI

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PBI Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does PBI convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$317M
EBITDA
$406M
FCF Conversion
78%
Reinvestment Rate
22%
78% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

PBI converts 78% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1325,949$15.31$397,279.19
2026-05-12166,675$15.90$2.7M
2026-05-07415$15.03$6,237.45
2026-04-288,805$15.74$138,590.7
2026-04-2211,860$14.63$173,511.8
2026-04-163$11.88$35.64
2026-03-2516,947$10.66$180,655.02
2026-03-246,242$10.57$65,977.94
2026-03-231,740,554$10.19$17.7M
2026-03-207,592$10.18$77,286.56
2026-03-193,945$9.80$38,661
2026-03-1314,455$10.14$146,573.7
2026-03-108,371$10.67$89,318.57
2026-03-09103$10.58$1,089.74
2026-03-061,500$10.88$16,320
2026-03-021,577$10.73$16,921.21
2026-02-2752,651$10.85$571,263.35
2026-02-2639,525$10.66$421,336.5
2026-02-2546,610$10.63$495,464.3
2026-02-231,367$10.51$14,367.17
2026-02-138,031$10.17$81,675.27
2026-02-122,199$10.35$22,759.65
2026-02-0519,568$10.53$206,051.04
2026-02-0362,771$10.53$660,978.63
2026-01-2999$10.13$1,002.87
2026-01-2810,723$10.17$109,052.91
2026-01-2771$10.29$730.59
2026-01-2011,826$10.51$124,291.26
2026-01-121$10.60$10.6
2026-01-0812,935$10.20$131,937

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare PBI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.