SIRI (SIRI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of the entity appears constrained, as indicated by a Return on Invested Capital spread that sits at only 5.1%, suggesting limited excess returns over the cost of debt and equity. This modest profitability is mathematically decomposed via DuPont analysis into a robust net margin of 9.4% offset significantly by low asset turnover of 0.31x, while leverage remains moderate at an equity multiplier of 2.36x. Quality metrics present a mixed signal: the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 reflects solid fundamentals with minor weaknesses in financial strength or profitability trends, whereas the Beneish M-Score of -2.51 strongly indicates low susceptibility to earnings manipulation. Despite these structural characteristics, revenue growth has contracted by 1.6% year-over-year, highlighting a stagnation in top-line expansion that may be pressuring future margin maintenance despite current gross margins holding steady at 47.0%.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing this asset at a discount relative to intrinsic value models; with a current price-to-earnings ratio of 10.2x, the stock trades below its calculated DCF fair value of $40 per share. This disparity implies that current multiples do not fully incorporate potential recovery scenarios or assume lower-than-modeled growth trajectories in terminal values. The market's compression of valuation appears to be a reaction to the negative revenue momentum rather than an overreaction to profitability, as earnings yield remains attractive relative to historical norms if growth were to stabilize. Investors must weigh whether the low P/E reflects permanent structural headwinds or represents a mean-reversion opportunity given the strong margin profile and low manipulation risk score.
Insider activity during the past 90 days has remained neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear directional signal regarding management's confidence in near-term catalysts. While the Fama-French alpha data was not provided to assess style premiums or factor tilts, the combination of moderate leverage and declining revenue suggests a risk profile where downside protection relies heavily on margin resilience rather than balance sheet strength or growth acceleration. The divergence between high gross margins and shrinking revenues creates an asymmetric scenario where operational efficiency gains are necessary to offset volume contraction before any meaningful multiple expansion can occur.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7% | 9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $43 | $29 | $14 |
| 3% | $62 | $40 | $19 |
| 4% | $100 | $57 | $25 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $40 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VOX or VBR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SIRI shares regardless of SIRI's individual fundamentals. We estimate $154M of passive capital is structurally linked to SIRI through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SIRI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SIRI to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SIRI (SIRI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SIRI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SIRI Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SIRI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SIRI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SIRI convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SIRI converts 59% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 1,500 | $26.79 | $40,185 |
| 2026-05-11 | 6,956 | $27.10 | $188,507.6 |
| 2026-05-04 | 738 | $27.22 | $20,088.36 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,961 | $26.76 | $52,476.36 |
| 2026-04-28 | 350 | $26.55 | $9,292.5 |
| 2026-04-27 | 600 | $26.61 | $15,966 |
| 2026-04-24 | 15 | $28.00 | $420 |
| 2026-04-23 | 32,909 | $28.06 | $923,426.54 |
| 2026-04-22 | 8 | $26.18 | $209.44 |
| 2026-04-20 | 75,750 | $25.48 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-16 | 559 | $24.21 | $13,533.39 |
| 2026-04-15 | 50,626 | $23.72 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-13 | 160 | $23.70 | $3,792 |
| 2026-04-07 | 167 | $23.39 | $3,906.13 |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,552 | $23.79 | $36,922.08 |
| 2026-04-01 | 211 | $23.08 | $4,869.88 |
| 2026-03-31 | 293 | $22.76 | $6,668.68 |
| 2026-03-30 | 284 | $22.84 | $6,486.56 |
| 2026-03-26 | 29,634 | $22.99 | $681,285.66 |
| 2026-03-24 | 61 | $22.47 | $1,370.67 |
| 2026-03-20 | 865 | $22.40 | $19,376 |
| 2026-03-16 | 1,581 | $21.99 | $34,766.19 |
| 2026-03-09 | 100 | $22.25 | $2,225 |
| 2026-03-06 | 30,406 | $22.63 | $688,087.78 |
| 2026-03-05 | 791 | $22.64 | $17,908.24 |
| 2026-03-03 | 4,327 | $21.94 | $94,934.38 |
| 2026-03-02 | 564,919 | $21.96 | $12.4M |
| 2026-02-25 | 54,942 | $20.97 | $1.2M |
| 2026-02-24 | 2,630 | $20.96 | $55,124.8 |
| 2026-02-23 | 174 | $21.06 | $3,664.44 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SIRI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.