Stock vs Stock Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. vs Accel Entertainment, Inc.

EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 7–1.

EAT
ACEL

🏆 Tale of the Tape

71
EATACEL
7.1%Profitability (Net Margin)3.9%
13.7xValuation (P/E)
20.2%Efficiency (ROIC)8.6%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)7/9
4.1Safety (Altman Z)
21.9%Growth (Rev YoY)8.1%
6.22xBalance Sheet (D/E)3.03x
6.51%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricEATACEL
Market Cap$6.0B
P/E Ratio13.7x
Forward P/E11.0x
P/B15.55x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.36

Quantitative Metrics

MetricEATACEL
DCF Fair Value$165.06$3.02
DCF Upside
Piotroski F8/97/9
Altman Z4.10
Beneish M-2.92-2.17
FCF Yield6.51%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.5x1.5x
ROIC20.2%8.6%
WACC12.7%
ROIC – WACC7.6pp
Gross Margin18.3%31.4%
Net Margin7.1%3.9%
Rev Growth YoY21.9%8.1%
Sharpe (1Y)
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

EAT Price

Loading chart...

ACEL Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

EAT found in:

SLYG0.72%
SPSM0.35%
VTWO0.20%
VBK0.20%
VCR0.15%
VXF0.08%
VB0.08%
SPTM0.01%

ACEL found in:

VCR0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

EAT vs ACEL: Head-to-Head Analysis

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, EAT leads 7–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, EAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 20.2% compared to ACEL's 8.6%. This suggests EAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

EAT appears in 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACEL appears in 1 ETF. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, EAT or ACEL?

Our quantitative analysis compares EAT and ACEL across nine fundamental dimensions. EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 7–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are EAT and ACEL correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.