Stock vs Stock Comparison

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. vs BHP Group Limited

BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

SQM$80.84
BHP$93.15

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
SQMBHP
12.8%Profitability (Net Margin)17.6%
30.0xValuation (P/E)22.1x
7.1%Efficiency (ROIC)17.2%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)4/9
3.5Safety (Altman Z)3.8
1.1%Growth (Rev YoY)-7.9%
1.99Risk (Sharpe 1Y)2.01
0.80xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.08x
FCF Yield4.57%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Rolling Correlation

0.527
252-Day Correlation
0.561
126-Day Correlation

Moderately correlated — some diversification benefit from holding both.

Fundamentals

MetricSQMBHP
Market Cap$24.5B$225.9B
P/E Ratio30.0x22.1x
Forward P/E14.8x16.7x
P/B4.18x4.48x
Dividend Yield1.20%2.99%
Beta1.030.80

Quantitative Metrics

MetricSQMBHP
DCF Fair Value$19.51
DCF Upside-75.0%
Piotroski F6/94/9
Altman Z3.483.78
Beneish M-2.88
FCF Yield4.57%
Net Debt/EBITDA2.2x0.3x
ROIC7.1%17.2%
WACC9.8%9.2%
ROIC – WACC-2.8pp7.9pp
Gross Margin29.6%71.7%
Net Margin12.8%17.6%
Rev Growth YoY1.1%-7.9%
Sharpe (1Y)1.992.01
Max Drawdown 3Y-61.3%-37.2%
FCF Payout Ratio69%

SQM Price

Loading chart...

BHP Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

SQM found in:

LIT4.06%
CWI0.04%

BHP found in:

VPL1.61%
VYMI1.05%
SPDW0.65%
VEA0.61%
CWI0.59%
VEU0.49%
VXUS0.17%
VT0.17%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

SQM vs BHP: Head-to-Head Analysis

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) represent two companies in the Basic Materials sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BHP leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, SQM generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 7.1% compared to BHP's 17.2%. This suggests BHP is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

The 252-day rolling correlation between SQM and BHP is 0.527, indicating moderate co-movement, with some diversification value from holding both in a portfolio context.

SQM appears in 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while BHP appears in 8 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, SQM or BHP?

Our quantitative analysis compares SQM and BHP across nine fundamental dimensions. BHP wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are SQM and BHP correlated?

The 252-day correlation between SQM and BHP is 0.527. They show moderate correlation — partially diversifying.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.