Stock vs Stock Comparison

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. vs Acadian Asset Management Inc.

BHF wins the Tale of the Tape 4–3.

BHF
AAMI

🏆 Tale of the Tape

43
BHFAAMI
6.8%Profitability (Net Margin)14.2%
10.5xValuation (P/E)
0.2%Efficiency (ROIC)31.5%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)3/9
0.0Safety (Altman Z)
46.3%Growth (Rev YoY)11.5%
34.39xBalance Sheet (D/E)7.06x

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricBHFAAMI
Market Cap$3.4B
P/E Ratio10.5x
Forward P/E3.0x
P/B0.51x
Dividend Yield
Beta0.95

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBHFAAMI
DCF Fair Value
DCF Upside
Piotroski F5/93/9
Altman Z0.04
Beneish M-1.83
FCF Yield
Net Debt/EBITDA-3.6x
ROIC0.2%31.5%
WACC7.5%
ROIC – WACC-7.3pp
Gross Margin42.7%
Net Margin6.8%14.2%
Rev Growth YoY46.3%11.5%
Sharpe (1Y)
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

BHF Price

Loading chart...

AAMI Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BHF found in:

KIE1.84%
MDYV0.22%
SPMD0.10%
MDY0.10%
VBR0.08%
VFH0.04%
ONEO0.02%
SPTM0.01%

AAMI found in:

SLYG0.23%
VFMO0.12%
SPSM0.11%
VFH0.02%
SPTM0.00%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BHF vs AAMI: Head-to-Head Analysis

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) represent two companies in the Financial Services sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, BHF leads 4–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BHF generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 0.2% compared to AAMI's 31.5%. This suggests AAMI is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

BHF appears in 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AAMI appears in 5 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BHF or AAMI?

Our quantitative analysis compares BHF and AAMI across nine fundamental dimensions. BHF wins the Tale of the Tape 4–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BHF and AAMI correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.