ETF · Miscellaneous Sector

Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF(BOTZ)

$40.64
+0.10%
Expense Ratio
$2.9B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
94.1%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF presents a concentrated exposure to the technology sector, which accounts for 10.0% of its total assets under management according to available data points, though this figure appears disproportionately low relative to typical robotics and AI fund compositions where tech often dominates significantly higher percentages. The portfolio exhibits notable concentration risk among its largest positions, with individual holdings exceeding double-digit weightings or approaching single digits, indicating that a small number of constituents drive the majority of the fund's performance trajectory. This top-heavy structure suggests that market movements in these specific large-cap names will have an outsized impact on overall volatility and returns compared to more broadly diversified alternatives within the same thematic space.

Geographically, the data provided reveals significant holdings with identifiers suggesting Japanese or Korean origins alongside familiar US-based technology giants like NVIDIA and Intuitive Surgical, implying a global tilt that extends beyond domestic markets despite the sector's heavy reliance on American innovation hubs. The inclusion of healthcare-specific exposure through companies like ISRG diversifies the thematic focus slightly, acknowledging the intersection between medical automation and broader artificial intelligence applications. Quantitative metrics indicate an asset base nearing three billion dollars, which provides sufficient liquidity for trading while maintaining a profile typical of mid-to-large cap thematic vehicles rather than niche micro-cap strategies.

The sector breakdown listed shows technology at 10.0% and healthcare at 5.8%, figures that seem inconsistent with the fund's stated mandate given the magnitude of individual tech holdings observed in the top ten list. This discrepancy between aggregate reported weights and granular holding data warrants close scrutiny by investors seeking to understand true allocation drivers versus published summaries. Ultimately, the ETF constructs a high-beta profile heavily weighted toward specific mega-cap leaders while incorporating international elements, creating a return stream that is tightly coupled with the fortunes of its largest constituents rather than offering broad industry diversification across smaller players in the robotics and AI value chain.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 07:37:45.886808+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100

The investment theme of robotics and artificial intelligence is only partially reflected in the provided holdings data, as a significant portion of the top positions lack explicit sector classifications or industry descriptors that confirm their relevance to automation. While NVIDIA represents a clear technology exposure with substantial weight, several major constituents are listed without specific thematic labels, making it difficult to verify if they contribute directly to the fund's stated mission rather than serving as broad market stabilizers. The presence of healthcare holdings further suggests a diversified approach that may dilute the pure robotics focus, indicating potential reliance on general growth names or sector leaders whose primary business is not exclusively defined by artificial intelligence integration.

Concentration risk appears elevated given that the top ten positions account for nearly 64% of assets under management, with technology and healthcare comprising the only identifiable sectors in this breakdown. This heavy weighting implies a limited number of drivers supporting the fund's performance, which contrasts with the expectation of a broad-based thematic exposure across various sub-sectors like industrial automation or software development. The narrow sector representation suggests the portfolio may not be sufficiently differentiated from broader market indices that also hold these large-cap technology and healthcare leaders, raising questions about whether the strategy achieves genuine thematic coherence or simply aggregates well-known names under an artificial intelligence label to attract investors seeking exposure to those specific giants.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 06:41:43.818914+00

⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis

AI Generated

The newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of this robotics and artificial intelligence fund highlight three converging macro-level threats that could impact sector-wide performance. The most prominent systemic risks involve regulatory headwinds, specifically regarding climate change compliance, data privacy standards, and responsible AI usage. These disclosures indicate a growing external pressure on companies to align their operations with evolving legal frameworks, which may necessitate significant capital expenditure or operational adjustments across the entire portfolio.

Concentration analysis reveals that these shared threats are not isolated incidents but represent correlated downside risks due to the heavy weighting of major constituents in this specific risk category. With NVIDIA alone accounting for a combined 30% exposure via three distinct regulatory and environmental disclosures, the fund's performance is highly sensitive to shifts in global policy regarding technology governance and sustainability. This clustering suggests that adverse changes in government regulations or stricter enforcement of data privacy laws could simultaneously depress earnings across multiple top-tier holdings, amplifying volatility within the ETF rather than diversifying it away from these specific macro uncertainties.

While the provided text exclusively details regulatory and environmental concerns for NVIDIA without offering fresh risk factors for other major holders like ISRG or the Japanese-listed entities in this snapshot, the sheer magnitude of the largest single holding's exposure creates a potential point of disproportionate impact. If the broader market begins to react negatively to these specific compliance costs flagged by such a dominant weight, it could skew the fund's overall trajectory regardless of how other smaller positions perform relative to their own unique risks.

Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 23:23:04.717485+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation profile of the Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF reveals a portfolio heavily weighted toward specific technological and healthcare applications rather than broad industry exposure. While Technology represents only 10% of the reported sectors, this figure likely understates the fund's true thematic focus given that NVIDIA, a primary driver of AI infrastructure, constitutes an identical 10% within that slice alone. The presence of Intuitive Surgical in Healthcare further underscores a strategic tilt toward companies leveraging automation and robotics for specialized industrial and medical uses rather than general software or hardware developers. This narrow sector breakdown suggests the fund's investment thesis is predicated on identifying pure-play beneficiaries of mechanization trends, accepting limited diversification across traditional technology sub-sectors to capture high-growth potential in specific verticals.

The concentration risk inherent in this structure is pronounced, with the top ten holdings accounting for nearly 64% of total assets under management. Such a heavy reliance on a small number of equities amplifies volatility and ties performance closely to the fortunes of individual market leaders like NVIDIA and Intuitive Surgical rather than the broader robotics theme as a whole. The data indicates that the fund prioritizes capturing alpha from dominant incumbents over building a diversified basket of emerging players, which could lead to significant drawdowns if those specific names underperform or face regulatory headwinds. This approach reflects an aggressive stance where the manager believes the upside potential of these concentrated positions outweighs the risks associated with lack of breadth within the portfolio.

Ultimately, the factor tilts evident here align closely with growth and momentum characteristics rather than value or low-volatility profiles. By concentrating assets in companies already commanding significant market share in robotics and AI, the fund implicitly bets on continued expansion of these sectors' dominance. The minimal presence of other technology holdings suggests a deliberate avoidance of dilution from slower-growing tech segments, reinforcing a high-risk, high-reward strategy focused exclusively on the intersection of automation and artificial intelligence innovation.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 20:02:53.967253+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share BOTZ's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of BOTZ's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF$28B956.2%
URTHiShares MSCI World ETF$7B854.5%
IXUSiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF$52B1346.7%
IEFAiShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF$170B1245.6%
SCHFSCHF$57B742.0%

56% of BOTZ's portfolio by weight is also held by ACWI, which commands 10× more assets under management. When ACWI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging BOTZ's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofBOTZ's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

36.6x
Weighted P/E
10.52x
Weighted P/B
0.73%
Dividend Yield
$3.3T
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 60% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000498
Well Diversified
Top 5: 40.7%Top 10: 59.7%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other84.9%Technology9.5%Healthcare5.5%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
77% Weight
Market Cap
Mega
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
6%
0–3 Weak
33%
4–6 Average
38%
7–9 Strong

Based on 77% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
51%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
51% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside BOTZ collectively pay out 51% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 51% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+30.7%
ETF 1Y Return
+19.8%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+11.0%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

BOTZ is up 30.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +19.8%. The remaining +11.0% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 77% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of BOTZ's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

69% Creators
31% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)31.0%
Value Destroyers14.2%

Of BOTZ's analyzed weight, 69% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 31% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 45% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

ELEVATED
10.5%
Largest Holding
CH0012221716
30.1%
Top 3 Weight
18
Effective # of Stocks
20%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
CH0012221716
NVDA
JP3802400006
JP3236200006
Other 45 stocks

BOTZ's top holding CH0012221716 at 10.5% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 18 vs. the actual count of 50.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

11/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership3.3%
Most Crowded HoldingISRG (16.2%)
Least CrowdedKR7277810008 (0.0%)
Coverage71% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

BOTZ has a low Passive Crowding Score of 11/100. On average, 3.3% of the market capitalization of BOTZ's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration63.8%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1CH0012221716
ABB Ltd
10.50%
39.8x7/9
2NVDA
NVIDIA CORPORATION
Technology
9.95%
32.4x4/9
3JP3802400006
FANUC CORPORATION
9.69%
44.2x7/9
4JP3236200006
KEYENCE CORPORATION
6.37%
43.7x5/9
5ISRG
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
Healthcare
5.81%
51.5x7/9
6JP3497400006
DAIFUKU CO.,LTD.
5.27%
36.1x8/9
7BNYREPOS
BNYREPOS
4.71%
8JP3162600005
SMC CORPORATION
4.54%
26.2x7/9
9KR7277810008
Rainbow Robotics
3.85%
4/9
10JP3932000007
YASKAWA Electric Corporation
3.15%
53.2x5/9
11192422103
COGNEX CORPORATION
3.08%
12477839104
JBT MAREL CORPORATION
2.66%
13705573103
PEGASYSTEMS INC.
2.50%
14JP3197800000
OMRON Corporation
2.45%
33.0x6/9
15US0080731088
AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
2.37%
2/9
The bottom 36 stocks in BOTZ account for only 23.1% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how BOTZ’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 76.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CH001222171610.50%3,976,695$371.4M
2NVDA9.95%1,986,508$352.0M
3JP38024000069.69%7,523,134$342.8M
4JP32362000066.37%532,485$225.3M
5ISRG5.81%407,784$205.3M
6JP34974000065.27%4,493,108$186.3M
7BNYREPOS4.71%$166.5M
8JP31626000054.54%332,472$160.6M
9KR72778100083.85%227,618$136.1M
10JP39320000073.15%3,154,674$111.4M
111924221033.08%2,002,271$108.9M
124778391042.66%610,759$94.1M
137055731032.50%2,022,427$88.4M
14JP31978000002.45%2,439,797$86.8M
15US00807310882.37%332,660$83.9M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

27.8%
Annual Volatility
1.08
Sharpe (1Y)
-20.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.

1.12
Market β
+0.357
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
-0.304
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
-0.280
Profit (RMW)
Weak
-0.056
Invest (CMA)
Neutral
Alpha (annual): +1.20%
R²: 81.2%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove BOTZ Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.10%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

Top Detractors

-0.022%
-0.190%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF is currently trading at $40.23, presenting a snapshot of its immediate market positioning within the miscellaneous sector. While specific moving average levels are not provided in this dataset, the current price point serves as a reference for assessing relative strength or weakness against historical trends. Observers would typically compare this level to key short and long-term averages to determine if the asset is exhibiting bullish momentum by trading above these benchmarks or bearish pressure when below them. Regarding short-term velocity, the absence of RSI data in the provided parameters prevents a definitive assessment of overbought or oversold conditions. In a complete technical picture, such an indicator would clarify whether recent price movements reflect sustained acceleration or potential exhaustion at current levels. Without these specific metrics, any conclusion regarding immediate trend direction relies solely on the absolute price figure without context from momentum oscillators or moving average crossovers. Ultimately, this limited dataset offers only the static valuation of $40.23 per share within its sector classification. A comprehensive analysis requires additional inputs such as precise moving average placements and relative strength index readings to fully evaluate whether the current trajectory supports an uptrend or signals a potential reversal. Market participants must integrate these missing variables with broader economic factors before forming a view on future performance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How BOTZ’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2457 snapshots
Other84.9%
Technology9.5%
Healthcare5.5%
Change since 2026-03-26
Other
+2.6%
Healthcare
-1.5%
Technology
-1.1%
2026-03-262026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

AUM & Capital Flow Tracker

Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.

Total Net Assets
$3.54B
Est. AUM Change (90d)
+$252.0M
Price Change (90d)
+7.60%
Filing Snapshots
2
01-2302-1303-0903-3004-2105-1206-02$2.84B$3.25B$3.66B
Estimated AUMTNA Filing Date

Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($3.54B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.