ETF · Broad Market

IYJ(IYJ)

$157.47
+0.41%
Expense Ratio
$2.0B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
63.4%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The IYJ ETF presents a concentrated exposure primarily to the Industrials sector, which accounts for 22.0% of its portfolio, followed by Financial Services at 14.3%. This structural tilt suggests the fund is positioned to capture performance trends specific to manufacturing, aerospace, and defense industries rather than offering broad market diversification. The top ten holdings reveal a significant reliance on just two major sectors, with six of those positions falling within Industrials alone. Notably, General Electric holds a substantial weight at 3.8%, while GE Aviation adds another 3.7%, indicating that the fund's performance may be heavily influenced by the fortunes of these specific industrial giants alongside other heavyweights like Caterpillar and RTX.

Geographic concentration is implied through the nature of its top holdings, which are predominantly U.S.-based blue-chip companies such as Visa, Mastercard, and American Express within Financial Services, paired with domestic industrial leaders. With an Assets Under Management figure of $2.0 billion, the fund possesses a moderate size that allows for active management or specific index tracking without excessive liquidity constraints often seen in smaller vehicles. The weighting distribution shows a lack of diversification outside its primary themes; for instance, Visa and Mastercard together represent over 12% of the portfolio, creating potential volatility if consumer payment trends shift. While the sector breakdown highlights a clear bias toward capital-intensive industries and financial intermediaries typical of economic expansion phases, the absence of significant allocations to technology or healthcare distinguishes it from broader market indices. Investors analyzing this vehicle should consider how these specific concentration risks align with their current views on industrial cyclicality and consumer spending power before making any allocation decisions.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 17:29:22.198257+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100

The thematic alignment between the IYJ investment objective and its actual portfolio composition reveals significant divergence. While the fund implies a focus on industrial innovation or specific sector themes, the top holdings are dominated by mega-cap financial services giants like V and MA alongside broad industrials such as CAT and GE. These entities represent established market leaders rather than emerging disruptors typically associated with niche thematic strategies, suggesting the portfolio may be leveraging large-cap names to ensure stability rather than maintaining a strict adherence to its stated theme. The presence of major banks within an industrial-themed fund indicates that the underlying strategy might rely on broad market exposure under the guise of sector specificity.

Sector concentration and coherence further highlight the distinction between this ETF and a true thematic vehicle. With Industrials comprising 22% and Financial Services at 14.3%, the allocation lacks the deep, specialized focus required for genuine differentiation from a broad index like the S&P 500. The heavy weighting in established giants creates a profile that mirrors general market performance more than it reflects unique industrial sector dynamics or innovation metrics. Consequently, investors seeking pure exposure to a specific industrial sub-theme may find the actual risk and return drivers of this fund differ substantially from their expectations based on its name alone.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 17:37:12.860927+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of IYJ presents a distinct tilt toward Industrials, which comprise 22.0% of the portfolio through seven constituent holdings, followed by Financial Services at 14.3%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on companies driving infrastructure development and capital goods production while maintaining exposure to financial intermediaries that often benefit from economic expansion. The heavy reliance on these two sectors indicates a strategy designed to capture growth associated with industrial output and lending activity rather than diversifying across technology or consumer discretionary names.

Concentration risk appears moderate but notable, as the top five holdings account for 25.1% of assets under management, with the top ten reaching 36.4%. This level of concentration implies that a significant portion of portfolio performance will be driven by the specific outcomes of major players like V, CAT, and MA. The inclusion of these large-cap financials and industrials within the sector breakdown highlights a factor tilt toward established market leaders rather than small-cap or niche industrial firms. Such positioning may result in higher volatility if the broader economic cycle impacts capital expenditure spending or credit conditions differently than anticipated by the fund's underlying index methodology.

Ultimately, the structure reflects a focus on cyclical growth drivers where performance is closely tied to macroeconomic indicators such as GDP expansion and interest rate environments. The absence of significant weightings in defensive sectors like utilities or healthcare further underscores an aggressive stance aimed at capturing upside potential during periods of robust economic activity. Investors observing this allocation should note that the fund's returns will likely mirror the fortunes of its top industrial and financial constituents, making it sensitive to sector-specific headwinds while offering concentrated exposure to established industry giants.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 18:09:08.448562+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share IYJ's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of IYJ's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VTVT$80B1036.4%
QUSQUS$1B1036.4%
SPLGSPLG$97B1036.4%
SPTMSPTM$12B1036.4%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust$640B0.09%1036.4%

36% of IYJ's portfolio by weight is also held by VT, which commands 40× more assets under management. When VT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IYJ's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIYJ's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

31.9x
Weighted P/E
22.68x
Weighted P/B
0.83%
Dividend Yield
$362B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000152
Well Diversified
Top 5: 24.3%Top 10: 35.7%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Industrials60.6%Financial Services39.4%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
36% Weight
Market Cap
Mega
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
0%
0–3 Weak
22%
4–6 Average
14%
7–9 Strong

Based on 36% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
27%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.62%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
27% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside IYJ collectively pay out 27% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 34% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+13.6%
ETF 1Y Return
+37.0%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-23.4%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

IYJ is up 13.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +37.0%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 23.4% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 36% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of IYJ's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

63% Creators
37% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)21.5%
Value Destroyers12.7%

Of IYJ's analyzed weight, 63% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 37% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 34% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

37/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.2%
Most Crowded HoldingCAT (12.4%)
Least CrowdedAXP (9.2%)
Coverage36% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

IYJ has a Passive Crowding Score of 37/100. On average, 11.2% of the market capitalization of IYJ's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 33 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration36.4%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1V
Visa Inc Class A
Financial Services
7.01%
28.5x6/9
2CAT
Caterpillar Inc
Industrials
5.20%
43.7x6/9
3MA
Mastercard Inc Class A
Financial Services
5.11%
28.6x8/9
4GE
GE Aerospace
Industrials
3.81%
40.2x5/9
5GEV
GE Vernova Inc
Industrials
3.69%
28.3x6/9
6RTX
RTX Corp
Industrials
2.97%
33.6x8/9
7AXP
American Express Co
Financial Services
2.20%
19.8x4/9
8BA
Boeing Co
Industrials
2.19%
91.7x7/9
9ETN
Eaton Corp PLC
Industrials
2.14%
39.2x7/9
10UNP
Union Pacific Corp
Industrials
2.03%
21.6x7/9

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how IYJ’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

2026-05-23

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

2026-05-22

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

2026-05-21

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

2026-05-20

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

2026-05-19

10 holdings · 36.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1V7.01%
2CAT5.20%
3MA5.11%
4GE3.81%
5GEV3.69%
6RTX2.97%
7AXP2.20%
8BA2.19%
9ETN2.14%
10UNP2.03%

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

18.0%
Annual Volatility
1.25
Sharpe (1Y)
0.82
Sharpe (3Y)
-19.7%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-26.2%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove IYJ Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.41%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.084%
+0.055%
+0.017%

Top Detractors

-0.011%
-0.018%
-0.047%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price of $156.14 for IYJ sits within a context where Short-Term and Long-Term Moving Average crossovers often serve as key markers for institutional positioning shifts. When these averages converge or cross, it frequently indicates that larger market participants are reallocating capital based on changing valuation perceptions rather than retail sentiment alone. Volume trends accompanying such price movements provide critical insight into the conviction behind this activity; sustained high volume during upward moves typically suggests aggressive accumulation by sophisticated players, whereas declining volume during rallies may signal a lack of institutional support for further upside momentum. Price action relative to these moving averages reveals whether institutions are acting as net buyers or sellers in specific zones. A price trading above both short and long-term averages often reflects a bullish bias among large holders who view the asset as undervalued, while a breach below these lines can indicate distribution or a strategic exit from overvalued positions. The interplay between volatility contraction and subsequent expansion frequently precedes significant directional moves driven by institutional order flow entering new phases of accumulation or liquidation. Observing how volume clusters around support and resistance levels formed during previous average crossovers helps map out where major players have historically established their defensive or offensive boundaries in this security's recent history.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.62%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How IYJ’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2456 snapshots
Industrials60.6%
Financial Services39.4%
Change since 2026-03-30
Industrials
+0.5%
Financial Services
-0.5%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.