RDVY(RDVY)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe RDVY ETF manages approximately $20 billion in assets, reflecting significant scale within its investment universe. While the provided sector weightings indicate a nominal allocation of 12.7% to Technology, Industrials at 3.1%, and Communication Services at 2.8%, this top-level view masks substantial concentration risk among specific equities. The portfolio's most pronounced exposure lies in semiconductor equipment manufacturers, with LRCX, AMAT, KLAC, and MPWR collectively commanding nearly 15% of the total assets under management through their individual holdings ranging from 3.0% to 3.7%. This clustering suggests that a significant portion of the fund's performance will be driven by the cyclical fortunes of the semiconductor capital equipment sector rather than broad-based technology exposure as the headline figure might imply.
Geographically and industrially, the data reveals a tilt toward specific sub-sectors within Industrials and Energy, represented notably by GEV in Industrials (3.1%) and BKR in Energy (2.6%). The presence of major players like GOOGL at 2.8% highlights that Communication Services also wields outsized influence relative to its reported sector weight. Furthermore, the inclusion of ROST in Consumer Cyclical and BK in Financial Services indicates a diversified yet concentrated approach where individual stock weights often exceed their nominal sector categories due to the dominance of mega-cap constituents within those segments. With assets nearing $20 billion, liquidity is likely robust for these top holdings, but the heavy reliance on a small number of high-weight positions means that volatility in any single component—particularly among the semiconductor names—could disproportionately impact the overall portfolio trajectory regardless of broader market trends.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 17:21:46.17394+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100The investment theme implied by the name RDVY suggests a focus on robotics and automation, yet the actual holdings display a significant deviation from this specific narrative. While several top positions such as LRCX, AMAT, KLAC, and MPWR are integral to semiconductor manufacturing required for advanced robotics components, their classification under broad Technology sectors dilutes the direct thematic link. Furthermore, the inclusion of unrelated entities like BKR in Energy, BK in Financial Services, and ROST in Consumer Cyclical indicates that the fund's composition extends well beyond pure-play automation or robotics exposure. The presence of these diverse holdings suggests the portfolio may be utilizing a broader market approach to generate stability rather than maintaining a strict adherence to a narrow thematic strategy.
Sector coherence reveals a fragmented landscape where technology represents only 12.7% of the total weight, despite containing multiple heavyweights essential for automation infrastructure. This low allocation relative to typical sector-focused funds implies that the fund is not heavily concentrated in any single industry vertical but rather spreads risk across disparate sectors including Industrials and Communication Services. The top-ten concentration of 28.4% indicates a moderate level of diversification within the largest positions, yet the mix of industries prevents clear differentiation from a broad market index like the S&P 500. Consequently, while the fund includes key enablers for automation through its semiconductor and industrial holdings, the overall structure lacks the sector purity expected from a dedicated robotics theme, blending thematic elements with general large-cap exposure to mitigate volatility.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 22:05:03.75852+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation profile of RDVY reveals a distinct concentration within the Technology and Industrials sectors, which collectively account for 15.8% of the portfolio despite representing only two broad categories in the provided breakdown. The top five holdings are heavily skewed toward semiconductor equipment manufacturers like LRCX, AMAT, and KLAC, alongside GOOGL from Communication Services, indicating a specific tilt toward capital-intensive growth drivers rather than a balanced exposure across all technology sub-sectors. This narrow focus on four companies within the Technology sector alone suggests that while the fund aims to capture innovation themes, its actual risk profile is significantly influenced by the performance of these few large-cap names in hardware and digital infrastructure.
The data highlights substantial concentration risk, evidenced by the top-10 holdings comprising 28.4% of total assets under management. Such a high weighting implies that market volatility affecting any single leader could materially impact overall portfolio returns, as there is limited diversification to buffer against sector-specific downturns or company-level idiosyncrasies. The minimal allocations in other sectors such as Energy and Financial Services further underscore an aggressive thematic approach rather than broad market representation. Consequently, the fund's investment thesis appears centered on high-conviction bets regarding advanced manufacturing and digital services growth, potentially sacrificing breadth for targeted exposure to companies with significant capital expenditures and revenue expansion potential.
From a factor tilt perspective, this structure suggests a heavy bias toward momentum and size factors, as the top holdings are established leaders in their respective niches rather than small-cap or value-oriented names. The reliance on specific industry sub-sectors like semiconductors also introduces sensitivity to cyclical demand patterns for chips and broader macroeconomic conditions affecting industrial output. While this strategy may offer amplified returns during periods of technological acceleration, the lack of diversification across other economic drivers means the portfolio's performance will likely mirror the fortunes of its largest constituents more closely than a broadly diversified equity vehicle would.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 15:21:06.973881+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share RDVY's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of RDVY's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 9 | 26.1% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 9 | 26.1% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 9 | 26.0% |
| IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF | $762B | 0.03% | 9 | 26.0% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 9 | 26.0% |
26% of RDVY's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging RDVY's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofRDVY's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 26% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside RDVY collectively pay out 24% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 26% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryRDVY is up 26.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +37.3%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 11.1% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 26% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of RDVY's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of RDVY's analyzed weight, 73% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 27% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 21% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
RDVY has a Passive Crowding Score of 43/100. On average, 12.9% of the market capitalization of RDVY's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 37 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LRCX | Lam Research Corp Technology | 3.70% | 60.3x | 7/9 |
| 2 | AMAT | Applied Materials Inc Technology | 3.32% | 42.4x | 6/9 |
| 3 | GEV | GE Vernova Inc Industrials | 3.13% | 28.3x | 6/9 |
| 4 | KLAC | KLA Corp Technology | 3.05% | 54.3x | 8/9 |
| 5 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc Class A Communication Services | 2.84% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | MPWR | Monolithic Power Systems Inc Technology | 2.63% | 112.4x | 5/9 |
| 7 | BKR | Baker Hughes Co Class A Energy | 2.58% | 20.4x | 7/9 |
| 8 | ROST | Ross Stores Inc Consumer Cyclical | 2.46% | 32.4x | — |
| 9 | MLI | Mueller Industries Inc | 2.44% | 15.8x | 6/9 |
| 10 | BK | Bank of New York Mellon Corp Financial Services | 2.26% | 17.0x | 5/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how RDVY’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
10 holdings · 28.4% tracked weight2026-05-23
10 holdings · 28.4% tracked weight2026-05-22
10 holdings · 28.4% tracked weight2026-05-21
10 holdings · 28.4% tracked weight2026-05-20
10 holdings · 28.4% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove RDVY Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How RDVY’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.