Healthcare

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)

$3.8B
Market Cap
9.7
P/E Ratio
0.81
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 6.6 SafeBeneish M -0.82 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -3.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 9.7x earnings — a 85% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — ACAD is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 6.6. Beneish M-Score of -0.82 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Acadia Pharmaceuticals presents a distinct capital efficiency profile characterized by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -3.4%, indicating that current returns fail to cover the cost of capital despite robust profitability metrics. The DuPont decomposition reveals an engine driven primarily by exceptional margin expansion, with net margins at 36.5% and gross margins soaring near 91.7%, rather than operational leverage or asset turnover. This high-margin structure is supported by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, suggesting moderate fundamental strength, while the Altman Z-Score of 6.6 places the firm in safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk; however, the negative spread signals that earnings quality must eventually translate into higher returns on invested capital to justify valuation multiples.

Valuation metrics suggest a significant discount relative to peers and intrinsic models, with the current P/E ratio at 9.7x compared to a sector average of 37.5x. This compression implies the market is pricing in substantial downside risk or expecting near-term volatility that contradicts the underlying earnings trajectory. A DCF analysis indicates a fair value of $23, creating a wide gap between current trading levels and model-based estimates if growth assumptions hold steady at the observed 11.9% revenue expansion rate. The data suggests the stock is undervalued on an absolute basis but carries a premium risk profile that has suppressed its multiple to less than one-third of the sector mean.

The Beneish M-Score of -0.82 further supports the credibility of reported earnings, as it points away from potential manipulation and toward genuine operational performance. While the Piotroski score indicates room for fundamental improvement in three specific areas out of nine possible positive indicators, the combination of low valuation multiples and a clean fraud signal creates an asymmetric setup where downside protection is structurally higher than upside capture relative to historical sector norms. Investors must weigh whether the current price adequately compensates for the capital destruction implied by the negative ROIC spread against the potential re-rating if margin sustainability proves durable over time.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.8%9.8%11.8%
2%$29$21$16
3%$34$23$18
4%$41$27$20

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $23 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

9.7x
ACAD P/E
65.2x
Sector Avg
-85%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
6.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-0.82
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

91.7%
Gross Margin
36.5%
Net Margin
6.4%
ROIC
9.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -3.4%— Negative spread.
+11.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+72.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
105.1M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.27x
Debt / Equity
3.83x
Current Ratio
-1.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.87%
FCF Yield
116.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.11
Act: $0.11
+4.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.14
Act: $0.16
+15.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.15
Act: $0.42
+189.0%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.14
Act: $0.14
-4.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

24.6
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.09
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$28.35
52W High
$13.40
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$161M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ACAD
0.14%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$111B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XBI or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACAD shares regardless of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $161M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACAD through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACAD's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ACAD Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ACADEpicenterVBKETFVHTETFVTWOETFBELow RiskKRYSLow RiskALKSLow RiskTGTXLow RiskSANMMed Risk
ACAD Price Drop (%)0

If ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ACAD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ACAD Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ACAD

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ACAD Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$105M
EBITDA
$117M
FCF Conversion
90%
Reinvestment Rate
10%
90% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
6.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-3.4%

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. converts 90% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-291$22.67$22.67
2026-04-2425,749$22.11$569,310.39
2026-04-14431$21.46$9,249.26
2026-03-3111,320$21.07$238,512.4
2026-03-2588$20.96$1,844.48
2026-03-23172$20.74$3,567.28
2026-03-178$21.39$171.12
2026-02-2714,055$24.64$346,315.2
2026-02-242$24.73$49.46
2026-02-0633,067$23.46$775,751.82
2026-02-022$25.13$50.26
2026-01-2750$26.86$1,343
2026-01-23125,994$27.51$3.5M
2025-12-222,141$27.16$58,149.56
2025-12-1711,482$26.80$307,717.6
2025-12-1514,789$27.15$401,521.35
2025-12-026,623$24.85$164,581.55
2025-11-14300$23.64$7,092

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ACAD to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.