ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 9.7x earnings — a 85% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — ACAD is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 6.6. Beneish M-Score of -0.82 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAcadia Pharmaceuticals presents a distinct capital efficiency profile characterized by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -3.4%, indicating that current returns fail to cover the cost of capital despite robust profitability metrics. The DuPont decomposition reveals an engine driven primarily by exceptional margin expansion, with net margins at 36.5% and gross margins soaring near 91.7%, rather than operational leverage or asset turnover. This high-margin structure is supported by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, suggesting moderate fundamental strength, while the Altman Z-Score of 6.6 places the firm in safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk; however, the negative spread signals that earnings quality must eventually translate into higher returns on invested capital to justify valuation multiples.
Valuation metrics suggest a significant discount relative to peers and intrinsic models, with the current P/E ratio at 9.7x compared to a sector average of 37.5x. This compression implies the market is pricing in substantial downside risk or expecting near-term volatility that contradicts the underlying earnings trajectory. A DCF analysis indicates a fair value of $23, creating a wide gap between current trading levels and model-based estimates if growth assumptions hold steady at the observed 11.9% revenue expansion rate. The data suggests the stock is undervalued on an absolute basis but carries a premium risk profile that has suppressed its multiple to less than one-third of the sector mean.
The Beneish M-Score of -0.82 further supports the credibility of reported earnings, as it points away from potential manipulation and toward genuine operational performance. While the Piotroski score indicates room for fundamental improvement in three specific areas out of nine possible positive indicators, the combination of low valuation multiples and a clean fraud signal creates an asymmetric setup where downside protection is structurally higher than upside capture relative to historical sector norms. Investors must weigh whether the current price adequately compensates for the capital destruction implied by the negative ROIC spread against the potential re-rating if margin sustainability proves durable over time.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.8% | 9.8% | 11.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $29 | $21 | $16 |
| 3% | $34 | $23 | $18 |
| 4% | $41 | $27 | $20 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $23 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XBI or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACAD shares regardless of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $161M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACAD through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACAD's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ACAD. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ACAD Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ACAD Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ACAD Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. converts 90% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-29 | 1 | $22.67 | $22.67 |
| 2026-04-24 | 25,749 | $22.11 | $569,310.39 |
| 2026-04-14 | 431 | $21.46 | $9,249.26 |
| 2026-03-31 | 11,320 | $21.07 | $238,512.4 |
| 2026-03-25 | 88 | $20.96 | $1,844.48 |
| 2026-03-23 | 172 | $20.74 | $3,567.28 |
| 2026-03-17 | 8 | $21.39 | $171.12 |
| 2026-02-27 | 14,055 | $24.64 | $346,315.2 |
| 2026-02-24 | 2 | $24.73 | $49.46 |
| 2026-02-06 | 33,067 | $23.46 | $775,751.82 |
| 2026-02-02 | 2 | $25.13 | $50.26 |
| 2026-01-27 | 50 | $26.86 | $1,343 |
| 2026-01-23 | 125,994 | $27.51 | $3.5M |
| 2025-12-22 | 2,141 | $27.16 | $58,149.56 |
| 2025-12-17 | 11,482 | $26.80 | $307,717.6 |
| 2025-12-15 | 14,789 | $27.15 | $401,521.35 |
| 2025-12-02 | 6,623 | $24.85 | $164,581.55 |
| 2025-11-14 | 300 | $23.64 | $7,092 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ACAD to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.