Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 11.1x earnings — a 66% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — ACI is in the lower valuation range.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Albertsons Companies reveal a capital structure heavily reliant on financial leverage rather than operational efficiency or pricing power. While the DuPont decomposition shows an ROE of 28.3%, this return is driven almost entirely by an equity multiplier of 7.90x, masking a razor-thin net margin of just 1.2% despite healthy gross margins near 27.7%. This low profitability ceiling results in a modest ROIC-WACC spread and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating moderate financial strength but lacking the robust quality signal seen in high-growth peers. Conversely, the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.66 suggests management earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, lending credibility to the reported low margins even as revenue growth stagnates at a mere 1.5% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from cash flow assumptions. Trading at approximately 11.1x forward earnings, the stock is priced substantially below the sector average of 34.2x, implying the market has heavily discounted future prospects relative to peers in the consumer defensive space. A DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $25, which would imply that current prices are pricing in significantly lower growth expectations than what might be warranted if operational leverage were optimized; however, such a wide gap warrants scrutiny regarding persistent margin compression risks rather than immediate re-rating potential.
Risk assessment is complicated by conflicting signals between financial stability and ownership dynamics. The insider flow data indicates $863,767 of net selling over the past 90 days, suggesting management or major shareholders may be reducing exposure despite the low valuation multiple. When combined with the modest Piotroski score reflecting average balance sheet health, these factors create a scenario where downside protection is limited by active insider divestment, even if the asset appears cheap on a relative P/E basis compared to sector norms.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACI shares regardless of Albertsons Companies, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $425M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Albertsons Companies, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ACI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ACI Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ACI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 40,357 | $16.18 | $652,976.26 |
| 2026-05-07 | 2,108 | $16.03 | $33,791.24 |
| 2026-05-04 | 4,606 | $16.62 | $76,551.72 |
| 2026-05-01 | 3,957 | $16.85 | $66,675.45 |
| 2026-04-28 | 128 | $16.57 | $2,120.96 |
| 2026-04-22 | 9,654 | $17.10 | $165,083.4 |
| 2026-04-13 | 92,618 | $17.28 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-09 | 1,295 | $17.71 | $22,934.45 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2,449 | $18.05 | $44,204.45 |
| 2026-04-07 | 1,557 | $17.99 | $28,010.43 |
| 2026-04-06 | 3,123 | $17.45 | $54,496.35 |
| 2026-03-31 | 2,064 | $17.38 | $35,872.32 |
| 2026-03-23 | 588 | $17.29 | $10,166.52 |
| 2026-03-20 | 22,300 | $17.34 | $386,682 |
| 2026-03-18 | 10 | $17.63 | $176.3 |
| 2026-03-17 | 3,062 | $17.31 | $53,003.22 |
| 2026-03-12 | 6,744 | $16.44 | $110,871.36 |
| 2026-02-27 | 18,581 | $17.80 | $330,741.8 |
| 2026-02-26 | 563 | $17.70 | $9,965.1 |
| 2026-02-19 | 111,152 | $18.12 | $2.0M |
| 2026-02-17 | 275 | $18.57 | $5,106.75 |
| 2026-02-12 | 127,881 | $17.73 | $2.3M |
| 2026-02-09 | 2,624 | $18.09 | $47,468.16 |
| 2026-02-05 | 37,201 | $17.76 | $660,689.76 |
| 2026-02-04 | 3,485 | $17.45 | $60,813.25 |
| 2026-01-27 | 1 | $17.22 | $17.22 |
| 2026-01-26 | 5,497 | $17.06 | $93,778.82 |
| 2026-01-20 | 134 | $17.32 | $2,320.88 |
| 2026-01-09 | 227,316 | $16.63 | $3.8M |
| 2025-12-19 | 517 | $17.47 | $9,031.99 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ACI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.