Consumer Defensive

Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI)

$9.4B
Market Cap
11.1
P/E Ratio
0.25
Beta
3.51%
Dividend Yield

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 11.1x earnings — a 66% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — ACI is in the lower valuation range.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Albertsons Companies reveal a capital structure heavily reliant on financial leverage rather than operational efficiency or pricing power. While the DuPont decomposition shows an ROE of 28.3%, this return is driven almost entirely by an equity multiplier of 7.90x, masking a razor-thin net margin of just 1.2% despite healthy gross margins near 27.7%. This low profitability ceiling results in a modest ROIC-WACC spread and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating moderate financial strength but lacking the robust quality signal seen in high-growth peers. Conversely, the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.66 suggests management earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, lending credibility to the reported low margins even as revenue growth stagnates at a mere 1.5% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from cash flow assumptions. Trading at approximately 11.1x forward earnings, the stock is priced substantially below the sector average of 34.2x, implying the market has heavily discounted future prospects relative to peers in the consumer defensive space. A DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $25, which would imply that current prices are pricing in significantly lower growth expectations than what might be warranted if operational leverage were optimized; however, such a wide gap warrants scrutiny regarding persistent margin compression risks rather than immediate re-rating potential.

Risk assessment is complicated by conflicting signals between financial stability and ownership dynamics. The insider flow data indicates $863,767 of net selling over the past 90 days, suggesting management or major shareholders may be reducing exposure despite the low valuation multiple. When combined with the modest Piotroski score reflecting average balance sheet health, these factors create a scenario where downside protection is limited by active insider divestment, even if the asset appears cheap on a relative P/E basis compared to sector norms.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

11.1x
ACI P/E
32.6x
Sector Avg
-66%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

1.2%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
3.00x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
7.90x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
28.3%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
$-863,767
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-02FENNEBRESQUE KIM SOther14,629 shares
2026-03-02SCHUMACHER ALAN HOther9,471 shares
2026-03-02MCCOLLAM SHARON LGrant$2M
2026-03-02TURNER BRIAN KEVINOther9,471 shares
2026-03-02STONE WEST MARY ELIZABETHOther9,471 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.54
Act: $0.55
+1.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.40
Act: $0.44
+10.6%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.68
Act: $0.72
+5.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.44
Act: $0.48
+9.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.53
Price/Book
8M
Avg Volume
$23.20
52W High
$15.80
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$425M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ACI
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$472B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ACI shares regardless of Albertsons Companies, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $425M of passive capital is structurally linked to ACI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ACI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Albertsons Companies, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ACI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ACIEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskPGLow RiskKOLow RiskPEPLow Risk
ACI Price Drop (%)0

If Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ACI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ACI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ACI

Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-0840,357$16.18$652,976.26
2026-05-072,108$16.03$33,791.24
2026-05-044,606$16.62$76,551.72
2026-05-013,957$16.85$66,675.45
2026-04-28128$16.57$2,120.96
2026-04-229,654$17.10$165,083.4
2026-04-1392,618$17.28$1.6M
2026-04-091,295$17.71$22,934.45
2026-04-082,449$18.05$44,204.45
2026-04-071,557$17.99$28,010.43
2026-04-063,123$17.45$54,496.35
2026-03-312,064$17.38$35,872.32
2026-03-23588$17.29$10,166.52
2026-03-2022,300$17.34$386,682
2026-03-1810$17.63$176.3
2026-03-173,062$17.31$53,003.22
2026-03-126,744$16.44$110,871.36
2026-02-2718,581$17.80$330,741.8
2026-02-26563$17.70$9,965.1
2026-02-19111,152$18.12$2.0M
2026-02-17275$18.57$5,106.75
2026-02-12127,881$17.73$2.3M
2026-02-092,624$18.09$47,468.16
2026-02-0537,201$17.76$660,689.76
2026-02-043,485$17.45$60,813.25
2026-01-271$17.22$17.22
2026-01-265,497$17.06$93,778.82
2026-01-20134$17.32$2,320.88
2026-01-09227,316$16.63$3.8M
2025-12-19517$17.47$9,031.99

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ACI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.