VDC(VDC)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe VDC ETF presents a highly concentrated portfolio dominated almost entirely by the Consumer Defensive sector, which accounts for nearly 90% of its total assets. This extreme tilt is immediately evident in the top holdings list, where ten positions are exclusively classified within this same industry group. The fund exhibits significant idiosyncratic risk due to heavy weighting in a small number of large-cap retailers and consumer staples giants; specifically, Walmart alone comprises over 16% of the total portfolio value, while Costco and Procter & Gamble each contribute more than 9%. Such a structure means that performance will be almost exclusively driven by the fortunes of these specific companies rather than broader market movements or diversification across other economic sectors.
Geographically and sectorially, the fund lacks exposure to emerging markets, technology, industrials, or financial services, creating a narrow risk profile focused strictly on established domestic consumer brands known for defensive characteristics during economic downturns. The presence of tobacco and alcohol manufacturers like Philip Morris and Molson Coors alongside traditional staples introduces specific regulatory and health-related sensitivities that are absent in more diversified equity baskets. With an asset base exceeding nine billion dollars, the fund possesses substantial liquidity but maintains a static strategic allocation that does not participate in cyclical growth narratives or industrial recovery themes. Investors seeking broad market exposure would find this vehicle insufficiently diversified given its near-total reliance on a single industry vertical and a handful of constituent names.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-19 16:15:16.667115+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 98/100The investment vehicle named VDC demonstrates an exceptionally high degree of alignment between its stated thematic focus and its actual portfolio composition. The top holdings are almost exclusively comprised of companies within the Consumer Defensive sector, with the largest positions held by major retailers and food/beverage giants such as Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble. This concentration confirms that the fund strictly adheres to a defensive strategy rather than drifting into unrelated industries or utilizing broad market names merely for stability. There is no evidence of holdings that contradict the implied theme of non-cyclical consumption staples, suggesting a disciplined approach to maintaining sector purity across its top constituents.
Sector coherence remains robust as 89.9% of assets are allocated to Consumer Defensive stocks, creating a highly focused profile distinct from broad market indices which typically include significant exposure to technology and financials. While the fund exhibits notable concentration risk with a top-10 holding weight exceeding 65%, this clustering reinforces its specialized nature rather than indicating a lack of differentiation. The minimal presence in other sectors further isolates the portfolio's performance drivers, ensuring that returns are primarily reflective of consumer staples dynamics. Observers may note that while this structure offers clarity regarding thematic exposure, it inherently ties fund volatility closely to movements within this specific industry segment.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 09:45:07.228751+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of VDC reveals an investment thesis heavily anchored in defensive equity exposure, with nearly ninety percent of assets concentrated within the Consumer Defensive category. This overwhelming focus suggests a strategy designed to prioritize capital preservation and income stability over aggressive growth or cyclical upside potential. By maintaining such a narrow footprint across other sectors like Industrials and Consumer Cyclical, which collectively account for less than two percent, the fund effectively isolates itself from broader economic fluctuations that typically impact non-essential spending or manufacturing output. The composition indicates a deliberate choice to capture returns primarily through companies with established pricing power and consistent demand regardless of macroeconomic conditions.
This extreme concentration is further amplified by the top ten holdings, which command sixty-five point three percent of total assets under management. Such high overlap among the largest positions creates significant idiosyncratic risk tied specifically to the fortunes of these five major firms rather than a diversified basket of consumer staples companies. The dominance of Walmart and Costco alone represents over twenty-eight percent of the portfolio, meaning that any adverse event affecting these specific retailers would have an outsized impact on overall fund performance compared to more broadly allocated peers. Consequently, while the factor tilt clearly favors low volatility and dividend yield characteristics inherent in mature defensive stocks, it simultaneously limits diversification benefits within the sector itself.
Ultimately, this structure presents a distinct profile where downside protection during market downturns may be enhanced due to the nature of the holdings, yet upside participation during economic expansions could be muted given the scarcity of cyclical exposure. The fund's architecture implies that investors are accepting substantial single-sector and top-ten concentration risk in exchange for reduced sensitivity to recessions or consumer spending contractions. Whether this aligns with specific portfolio goals depends entirely on an individual investor's tolerance for lack of diversification versus their need for stability during uncertain market environments.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 06:31:58.112048+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VDC's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VDC's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 78 | 97.7% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 54 | 93.3% |
| XLPState Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | $15B | — | 36 | 86.8% |
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | $640B | 0.09% | 36 | 86.8% |
| VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF | $1.5T | 0.03% | 35 | 86.5% |
98% of VDC's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VDC's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVDC's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 92% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VDC collectively pay out 70% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 85% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVDC is up 0.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +2.2%. Price performance is closely aligned with fundamental earnings growth — valuations are roughly unchanged.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 98% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VDC's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VDC's analyzed weight, 83% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 17% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 90% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
HIGHWMT at 16.2% contributes an estimated 40% of portfolio variance.VDC holds 50 stocks but behaves like an 15-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VDC has a Passive Crowding Score of 43/100. On average, 12.8% of the market capitalization of VDC's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 38 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | Walmart Inc. Consumer Defensive | 16.16% | 40.8x | 7/9 |
| 2 | COST | Costco Wholesale Corp. Consumer Defensive | 12.27% | 49.8x | 6/9 |
| 3 | PG | Procter & Gamble Co. Consumer Defensive | 9.12% | 21.0x | 6/9 |
| 4 | KO | Coca-Cola Co. Consumer Defensive | 8.35% | 24.8x | 7/9 |
| 5 | PEP | PepsiCo Inc. Consumer Defensive | 4.54% | 22.6x | 4/9 |
| 6 | PM | Philip Morris International Inc. Consumer Defensive | 4.17% | 25.0x | 8/9 |
| 7 | MO | Altria Group Inc. Consumer Defensive | 3.93% | 14.5x | 6/9 |
| 8 | MDLZ | Mondelez International Inc. Class A Consumer Defensive | 2.59% | 30.3x | 5/9 |
| 9 | CL | Colgate-Palmolive Co. Consumer Defensive | 2.16% | 34.9x | 5/9 |
| 10 | TGT | Target Corp. Consumer Defensive | 1.99% | 16.8x | 6/9 |
| 11 | MNST | Monster Beverage Corp. Consumer Defensive | 1.88% | 42.6x | 5/9 |
| 12 | KR | Kroger Co. Consumer Defensive | 1.46% | 40.4x | 6/9 |
| 13 | KDP | Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. Consumer Defensive | 1.32% | 22.2x | 6/9 |
| 14 | ADM | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. Consumer Defensive | 1.27% | 35.6x | 4/9 |
| 15 | SYY | Sysco Corp. Consumer Defensive | 1.23% | 21.1x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VDC’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 72.4% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WMT | 16.16% | 11,683,397 | $1.5B |
| 2 | COST | 12.27% | 1,153,444 | $1.2B |
| 3 | PG | 9.12% | 5,916,292 | $870.2M |
| 4 | KO | 8.35% | 10,111,540 | $796.4M |
| 5 | PEP | 4.54% | 2,730,516 | $432.8M |
| 6 | PM | 4.17% | 2,407,359 | $397.4M |
| 7 | MO | 3.93% | 5,155,094 | $374.5M |
| 8 | MDLZ | 2.59% | 4,024,164 | $247.2M |
| 9 | CL | 2.16% | 2,409,972 | $205.7M |
| 10 | TGT | 1.99% | 1,465,834 | $190.2M |
| 11 | MNST | 1.88% | 2,333,235 | $179.8M |
| 12 | KR | 1.46% | 2,041,884 | $139.0M |
| 13 | KDP | 1.32% | 4,289,327 | $126.1M |
| 14 | ADM | 1.27% | 1,624,468 | $121.1M |
| 15 | SYY | 1.23% | 1,573,945 | $117.6M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VDC Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VDC’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.