Technology

C3.ai, Inc. (AI)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Beneish M -3.62 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-3.62
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

60.6%
Gross Margin
-74.2%
Net Margin
-28.7%
ROIC
+25.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-44.4M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-74.2%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.38x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.22x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-34.4%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.22x
Debt / Equity
6.86x
Current Ratio
-311.8M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$21M
Net Selling
1
Buy Transactions
7
Sale Transactions
2026-03-18SIEBEL THOMAS MSold 5/8 qtrsGrant$1M
2026-03-18SIEBEL THOMAS MSold 5/8 qtrsSale$4M
2026-03-16LATH HITESHSold 7/8 qtrsSale$136,927
2026-03-13SIEBEL THOMAS MSold 5/8 qtrsOther21,331 shares
2026-03-13LATH HITESHSold 7/8 qtrsOther29,008 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.20
Act: $-0.16
+20.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.21
Act: $-0.37
-75.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.33
Act: $-0.25
+24.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.29
Act: $-0.40
-38.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.3B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding AI
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$1.3T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XSW or CWI, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AI shares regardless of C3.ai, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to AI through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in C3.ai, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AIEpicenterVXUSETFVEAETFVGTETFSMSNUnknownASMLLow RiskTSMLow RiskA000660UnknownASMLLow Risk
AI Price Drop (%)0

If C3.ai, Inc. (AI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with AI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AI

Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1421$8.65$181.65
2026-05-1320,667$8.79$181,662.93
2026-05-1243$9.48$407.64
2026-05-1127$9.87$266.49
2026-05-0868$9.58$651.44
2026-05-07160$9.60$1,536
2026-05-0616,712$9.41$157,259.92
2026-05-05120,577$9.22$1.1M
2026-05-04172,213$9.16$1.6M
2026-04-2983$8.97$744.51
2026-04-2835$8.79$307.65
2026-04-27226$8.64$1,952.64
2026-04-24221,989$8.54$1.9M
2026-04-2216,989$9.20$156,298.8
2026-04-216,828$9.38$64,046.64
2026-04-204,028$9.24$37,218.72
2026-04-1687,937$9.52$837,160.24
2026-04-156,151$8.40$51,668.4
2026-04-1028,303$8.58$242,839.74
2026-04-09149,676$8.78$1.3M
2026-04-08977$8.73$8,529.21
2026-04-0717,290$8.77$151,633.3
2026-04-0111,047$8.42$93,015.74
2026-03-31112,618$7.79$877,294.22
2026-03-27706$8.31$5,866.86
2026-03-2619,051$8.28$157,742.28
2026-03-23144,847$8.47$1.2M
2026-03-163,070$8.91$27,353.7
2026-03-1314,622$8.87$129,697.14
2026-03-1258,011$9.26$537,181.86

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.