Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares(VEA)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares presents a broad exposure to developed international equities, anchored by substantial assets under management that provide significant liquidity and stability. The fund's sector allocation reveals a balanced tilt toward technology and financial services, each comprising 40% of the portfolio, while energy accounts for roughly one-fifth of the remaining weight. This distribution suggests a diversified approach where no single industry dominates the risk profile, although the equal weighting of tech and finance indicates that performance will be heavily influenced by macroeconomic factors affecting these specific sectors.
Top holdings concentration remains moderate relative to large-cap U.S.-focused peers, with the largest positions representing just over two percent each. Notable constituents include ASML in technology and HSBA in financial services, alongside significant exposures to healthcare via AZN and energy through SHEL. The presence of multiple top-tier names across different industries reinforces the fund's objective of capturing the performance of a wide array of developed markets rather than concentrating on a narrow set of mega-cap leaders. This structure implies that idiosyncratic risks associated with any single company are mitigated by the sheer breadth of the underlying index, allowing for a more generalized representation of global economic trends outside North America.
Geographically, while specific country weights are not detailed in the provided data, the inclusion of major European and Asian entities like ASML and HSBA confirms a non-U.S. developed market focus. The quantitative metrics suggest a vehicle designed for investors seeking international diversification without direct access to U.S. equities. By maintaining relatively low individual stock concentrations within key sectors, the fund offers a streamlined method to gain exposure to global growth drivers while avoiding excessive reliance on any single national economy or industry cycle.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 08:49:13.327023+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares maintains a high degree of thematic alignment with its name, as the portfolio composition reflects a broad exposure to developed global equities rather than a narrow sector or specific investment strategy. The top holdings include diverse industry leaders across technology, healthcare, financial services, and basic materials, which collectively represent major economies within the developed market classification. There are no apparent outliers in the holding list that contradict the stated theme of diversified international equity exposure; instead, the inclusion of large-cap names like ASML and HSBA serves to capture established growth drivers typical of mature markets rather than indicating a deviation from the fund's mandate.
Sector weights demonstrate coherent distribution consistent with a broad market index approach, avoiding over-concentration in any single industry while maintaining significant representation across financial services, technology, industrials, and energy. The relatively low top-10 concentration of 11.7% suggests that returns are driven by widespread participation rather than reliance on a few mega-cap stocks to stabilize performance, reinforcing the fund's differentiation from thematic or concentrated strategies. By mirroring the sector breakdown of its underlying index without introducing idiosyncratic tilts, the fund effectively delivers the intended diversified exposure without unnecessary deviation, allowing investors to assess whether this broad-market approach suits their specific portfolio requirements.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 13:20:21.954054+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation profile of this fund reveals a distinct structural divergence from domestic U.S. equity benchmarks, characterized by an unusually low weighting in Technology and Healthcare sectors relative to the broader developed markets universe. With combined exposure to these growth-oriented industries falling below 6%, the portfolio suggests an investment thesis centered on broad market diversification rather than tilting toward high-growth or defensive megatrends typical of U.S.-centric strategies. Instead, the allocation heavily favors emerging market leaders within sectors like Financial Services and Energy, where single-country holdings such as HSBA and major Asian industrial giants contribute significantly to weightings that appear suppressed in this specific slice of data compared to their global footprint.
Concentration risk is notably mitigated by a top-10 holding concentration of merely 11.7%, indicating a highly diversified basket where no single asset exerts dominant influence over performance outcomes. This dispersion aligns with the fund's objective as a passive vehicle tracking developed markets indices, ensuring that idiosyncratic risks associated with individual large-cap stocks are minimized across hundreds of constituents. The presence of multiple holdings in Technology and Financial Services further underscores this breadth, preventing any single sector from driving volatility disproportionately despite their relatively modest percentage allocations within this specific view.
Factor tilts inferred from the data point toward a value orientation driven by heavy representation in traditional industrial and financial sectors while deliberately avoiding significant overexposure to communication services or consumer cyclicals often associated with growth factors. The minimal weightings in Utilities, Consumer Defensive, and Communication Services suggest an absence of defensive hedging strategies usually employed during periods of economic uncertainty. Ultimately, the structure reflects a pure-play developed markets exposure that prioritizes geographic breadth over sector-specific momentum, allowing returns to be determined by the aggregate performance of international economies rather than concentrated bets on specific industry cycles or growth narratives.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 02:51:08.736813+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VEA's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VEA's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VXUSVXUS | $624B | — | 385 | 69.1% |
| VEUVEU | $86B | — | 384 | 69.0% |
| SPDWSPDW | $36B | — | 445 | 66.0% |
| CWICWI | $2B | — | 396 | 63.6% |
| VTVT | $80B | — | 186 | 54.1% |
69% of VEA's portfolio by weight is also held by VXUS, which commands 2× more assets under management. When VXUS receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VEA's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVEA's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 24% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 20% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VEA collectively pay out 58% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 13% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVEA is up 33.5% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +28.9%. The remaining +4.5% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 19% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VEA's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VEA's analyzed weight, 71% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 29% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 12% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
SEVEREHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VEA has a Passive Crowding Score of 100/100. On average, 63.3% of the market capitalization of VEA's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. In the event of a broad sell-off, VEA faces elevated "gap-down" risk — as passive redemptions force simultaneous selling of constituents where a large portion of the float is not actively trading.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. | 2.24% | — | — |
| 2 | ASML | ASML Holding NV Technology | 1.77% | 53.8x | 8/9 |
| 3 | 000660 | SK hynix Inc. | 1.52% | — | — |
| 4 | HSBA | HSBC Holdings plc | 1.00% | — | — |
| 5 | ROP | Roche Holding AG Technology | 0.90% | 20.3x | 5/9 |
| 6 | AZN | AstraZeneca plc Healthcare | 0.90% | 27.9x | 7/9 |
| 7 | NOVN | Novartis AG | 0.89% | — | — |
| 8 | NESN | Nestle SA | 0.82% | — | — |
| 9 | SHEL | Shell plc Energy | 0.82% | 13.1x | 5/9 |
| 10 | RY | Royal Bank of Canada Financial Services | 0.79% | 17.1x | 3/9 |
| 11 | SIE | Siemens AG | 0.69% | — | — |
| 12 | CBA | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 0.66% | — | — |
| 13 | 7203 | Toyota Motor Corp. | 0.64% | — | — |
| 14 | 8306 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. | 0.62% | — | — |
| 15 | BHP | BHP Group Ltd. Basic Materials | 0.61% | 22.1x | 4/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VEA’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 6 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 9 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 6 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 9 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 6 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 9 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 6 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 9 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 6 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 9 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 14.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 005930 | 2.24% | 45,946,266 | $6.9B |
| 2 | ASML | 1.77% | 3,774,404 | $5.5B |
| 3 | 000660 | 1.52% | 5,274,232 | $4.7B |
| 4 | HSBA | 1.00% | 167,067,695 | $3.1B |
| 5 | AZN | 0.90% | 14,583,749 | $2.8B |
| 6 | ROP | 0.90% | 6,841,094 | $2.8B |
| 7 | NOVN | 0.89% | 18,676,605 | $2.8B |
| 8 | SHEL | 0.82% | 55,373,017 | $2.5B |
| 9 | NESN | 0.82% | 25,038,123 | $2.5B |
| 10 | RY | 0.79% | 13,609,149 | $2.4B |
| 11 | SIE | 0.69% | 7,143,997 | $2.1B |
| 12 | CBA | 0.66% | 16,252,864 | $2.0B |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.64% | 103,394,678 | $2.0B |
| 14 | 8306 | 0.62% | 106,906,078 | $1.9B |
| 15 | BHP | 0.61% | 47,677,565 | $1.9B |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VEA Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe 50-day moving average of VEA is above its 200-day moving average, indicating an upward trend in the short term relative to the longer-term trajectory. The RSI at 36 suggests that near-term momentum may be weakening but remains within neutral territory, not yet signaling overbought or oversold conditions.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VEA’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.