Alkermes plc (ALKS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 20.8x earnings — a 68% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — ALKS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 5.7.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedAlkermes plc presents a capital allocation profile characterized by robust economic moats, evidenced by an ROIC of 12.3% that suggests efficient deployment of equity relative to cost of capital, though the specific WACC spread remains unquantified in current data. The DuPont decomposition reveals a business driven primarily by exceptional gross margins at 86.7%, which are further amplified into a solid net margin of 16.4%, indicating strong pricing power rather than volume or leverage effects. Credit and financial stability metrics reinforce this quality, with an Altman Z-Score of 5.7 signaling low bankruptcy risk and a negative Beneish M-Score of -3.30 that points to high earnings authenticity, while the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects moderate fundamental strength without recent deterioration or improvement signals.
Valuation metrics indicate a significant discount relative to peer benchmarks, with the current P/E ratio of 20.8x trading substantially below the sector average of 37.5x. This compression suggests the market is pricing in heightened uncertainty regarding revenue contraction rather than simply rewarding growth premiums found elsewhere in healthcare. While the DCF model implies a fair value of $70, providing a theoretical anchor for intrinsic worth based on discounted cash flows, this valuation must be weighed against the observed -5.2% year-over-year revenue decline. The divergence between high profitability margins and negative top-line momentum creates a complex risk-reward dynamic where current multiples may reflect a mean reversion thesis or temporary distress pricing rather than structural weakness.
The synthesis of these factors highlights a stock with resilient unit economics facing headwinds in growth trajectory, potentially creating an asymmetric opportunity if the revenue decline stabilizes while margins remain intact. Investors must evaluate whether the 20.8x multiple adequately compensates for the negative earnings growth rate or if it undervalues the company's ability to restore top-line expansion given its strong margin profile and clean credit metrics.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $85 | $63 | $50 |
| 3% | $99 | $70 | $54 |
| 4% | $120 | $80 | $59 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $70 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XBI or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ALKS shares regardless of Alkermes plc's individual fundamentals. We estimate $484M of passive capital is structurally linked to ALKS through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ALKS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Alkermes plc to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Alkermes plc (ALKS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC (KRYS) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ALKS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ALKS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ALKS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ALKS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Alkermes plc convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Alkermes plc converts 145% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 3,757 | $35.32 | $132,697.24 |
| 2026-05-05 | 182,241 | $34.17 | $6.2M |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,032 | $33.91 | $34,995.12 |
| 2026-04-20 | 69,054 | $34.53 | $2.4M |
| 2026-04-08 | 46,394 | $33.02 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-07 | 13 | $34.08 | $443.04 |
| 2026-04-01 | 19,192 | $35.36 | $678,629.12 |
| 2026-03-31 | 34,000 | $30.15 | $1.0M |
| 2026-03-23 | 29 | $28.15 | $816.35 |
| 2026-03-11 | 11 | $27.74 | $305.14 |
| 2026-03-02 | 3,839 | $30.10 | $115,553.9 |
| 2026-02-27 | 9,641 | $30.73 | $296,267.93 |
| 2026-02-13 | 67 | $33.29 | $2,230.43 |
| 2026-02-09 | 953 | $34.91 | $33,269.23 |
| 2026-01-27 | 46,390 | $33.11 | $1.5M |
| 2026-01-23 | 10,036 | $33.95 | $340,722.2 |
| 2025-12-31 | 4 | $27.81 | $111.24 |
| 2025-12-30 | 69 | $28.01 | $1,932.69 |
| 2025-12-29 | 205 | $28.49 | $5,840.45 |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,160 | $28.45 | $33,002 |
| 2025-12-16 | 200 | $28.17 | $5,634 |
| 2025-12-02 | 412 | $28.90 | $11,906.8 |
| 2025-12-01 | 412 | $29.58 | $12,186.96 |
| 2025-11-13 | 1,210,208 | $31.41 | $38.0M |
| 2025-11-07 | 4,829 | $31.68 | $152,982.72 |
| 2025-11-05 | 98 | $30.39 | $2,978.22 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ALKS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.