Energy

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM)

$11.1B
Market Cap
27.0
P/E Ratio
0.75
Beta
3.88%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 2.4 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.91 CleanROIC−WACC +2.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

AM trades at 27.0x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 34.8x. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 2.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Antero Midstream Corporation exhibits robust fundamental quality, characterized by a 10.3% ROIC and an exceptionally high Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 alongside a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.91, signaling strong financial health with minimal earnings manipulation risk. The company's return on equity of 20.9% is primarily driven by superior profitability rather than operational efficiency or leverage; specifically, the high net margin of 32.8% outweighs a modest asset turnover rate of 0.21x and an equity multiplier of 2.98x. This structural advantage suggests earnings are generated through pricing power or cost management within its midstream operations, supported by substantial gross margins exceeding 65%.

Valuation metrics present a nuanced picture where the current P/E ratio of 27.0x trades at a discount to the sector average of 31.0x, potentially reflecting market caution despite the company's strong fundamentals and steady revenue growth of 7.0% year-over-year. A discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value of $72, which serves as a critical benchmark against current trading levels; however, this valuation must be weighed carefully given that the market appears to have priced in specific growth assumptions inherent in the DCF model's inputs. The divergence between the attractive relative P/E and the absolute DCF target requires scrutiny regarding whether the sector-wide discount is justified by macro headwinds or if it represents a mispricing of Antero's specific cash flow durability.

Risk factors emerge from recent insider activity, where $1,004,690 in net selling over the past 90 days introduces a counterweight to the otherwise positive fundamental narrative. While the high F-Score and low M-Score mitigate concerns regarding financial engineering or deteriorating business quality, the consistent insider offloading suggests management may perceive limited upside relative to current valuations or anticipate increased volatility ahead. Investors must reconcile the compelling operational metrics with this internal skepticism, as the interplay between strong profitability drivers and active insider distribution defines the near-term risk-reward profile for equity holders in this energy exposure.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6.2%8.2%10.2%
2%$95$61$43
3%$124$72$49
4%$178$88$56

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $72 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

27.0x
AM P/E
34.8x
Sector Avg
-22%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.4
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.91
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

65.3%
Gross Margin
32.8%
Net Margin
10.3%
ROIC
8.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +2.1%— Positive spread.
+7.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+3.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
770.2M
Free Cash Flow
57%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

32.8%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.21x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.98x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
20.9%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

1.98x
Debt / Equity
3.41x
Current Ratio
4.0x
Interest Coverage
3.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.46%
FCF Yield
959.6M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$1M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
3
Sale Transactions
2026-03-12KLIMLEY BROOKS JSold 4/8 qtrsSale$115,800
2026-03-10PEARCE SHERISold 3/8 qtrsSale$318,640
2026-03-09SCHULTZ YVETTE KSold 1/8 qtrsSale$570,250
2026-03-06KENNEDY MICHAEL NOther15,000 shares
2026-03-06KENNEDY MICHAEL NGrant261,210 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.30
Act: $0.28
-5.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.29
Act: $0.29
+1.2%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.29
Act: $0.27
-7.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.27
Act: $0.28
+2.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

15.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
5.59
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$23.84
52W High
$15.07
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$537M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding AM
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$562B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYG or VDE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AM shares regardless of Antero Midstream Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $537M of passive capital is structurally linked to AM through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AM's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Antero Midstream Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AM Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AMEpicenterVBETFVYMETFVXFETFXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow RiskFLEXMed RiskWMBHigh Risk
AM Price Drop (%)0

If Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AM Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AM

Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AM Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Antero Midstream Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$770M
EBITDA
$960M
FCF Conversion
80%
Reinvestment Rate
20%
80% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
2.1%

Antero Midstream Corporation converts 80% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1318,305$21.36$390,994.8
2026-05-0730,182$21.16$638,651.12
2026-04-16290$21.26$6,165.4
2026-03-24179,406$22.96$4.1M
2026-03-231,354$22.65$30,668.1
2026-03-206$23.07$138.42
2026-03-17552$22.88$12,629.76
2026-03-1322,050$22.85$503,842.5
2026-03-0935,416$22.97$813,505.52
2026-02-2748$22.36$1,073.28
2026-02-263,307$22.28$73,679.96
2026-02-231,221$21.63$26,410.23
2026-02-19254$20.97$5,326.38
2026-02-124,503$20.44$92,041.32
2026-01-2325,496$18.77$478,559.92
2026-01-2222,541$18.59$419,037.19
2026-01-2123,102$18.34$423,690.68
2026-01-15133,900$17.78$2.4M
2025-12-294,547$17.73$80,618.31
2025-11-264,979$17.60$87,630.4
2025-11-1727$18.16$490.32
2025-11-0781$17.24$1,396.44
2025-10-2925$17.61$440.25
2025-10-2227$18.25$492.75
2025-10-179,478$17.96$170,224.88
2025-10-01187$19.44$3,635.28

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AM to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.