Industrials

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI)

$7.0B
Market Cap
23.0
P/E Ratio
1.33
Beta
0.80%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 7.1 SafeBeneish M -2.63 CleanROIC−WACC +8.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 23.0x earnings — a 49% discount to the sector average of 44.7x — AWI is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 7.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

Armstrong World Industries demonstrates robust fundamental economics, characterized by a substantial ROIC-WACC spread of 8.2%, indicating strong value creation relative to the cost of capital. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this performance is driven primarily by operational efficiency rather than leverage or margin expansion alone; specifically, the company sustains healthy net margins at 19.1% while generating revenue growth of 12.1%. This high-quality earnings profile is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 7.1, which collectively signal strong financial health and low distress risk. Furthermore, the Beneish M-Score of -2.63 suggests that reported earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, reinforcing the credibility of these fundamental metrics within the Industrials sector.

Valuation analysis presents a distinct divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. While Armstrong trades at a P/E multiple of 23.0x—significantly below the sector average of 44.9x—this discount may reflect specific idiosyncratic concerns rather than poor relative valuation. A DCF model estimates a fair value of $94, implying that current market prices are priced for lower growth trajectories or carry a risk premium not fully captured in traditional multiples. The gap between the historical multiple and sector peers suggests the market is pricing in slower expansion compared to industry norms, yet the company's own revenue growth rate of 12.1% challenges assumptions underlying such a steep discount relative to its peer group.

The synthesis of these factors highlights a risk-reward profile where strong operational fundamentals contrast with a valuation that appears compressed against sector benchmarks. The combination of high profitability metrics and low distress indicators suggests the business model is resilient, yet the market's willingness to assign a P/E nearly half that of peers indicates significant skepticism regarding future scalability or competitive positioning. Investors must weigh whether the current price adequately compensates for perceived growth risks given the company's demonstrated ability to generate returns well above its cost of capital and maintain rigorous financial discipline as evidenced by the low Beneish score.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →10.5%12.5%14.5%
2%$110$86$70
3%$123$94$75
4%$139$103$81

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $94 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

23.0x
AWI P/E
44.7x
Sector Avg
-49%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
7.1
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.63
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

40.6%
Gross Margin
19.1%
Net Margin
20.6%
ROIC
12.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +8.2%— Positive value creation spread.
+12.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+16.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
246.1M
Free Cash Flow
22%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.14x
Debt / Equity
1.46x
Current Ratio
13.1x
Interest Coverage
0.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.37%
FCF Yield
553.7M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.53
Act: $1.66
+8.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.78
Act: $2.09
+17.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.03
Act: $2.05
+0.9%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.68
Act: $1.61
-4.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

17.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
7.75
Price/Book
565347
Avg Volume
$206.08
52W High
$122.37
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$419M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding AWI
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$379B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AWI shares regardless of Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $419M of passive capital is structurally linked to AWI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AWI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Armstrong World Industries, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AWI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AWIEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFLRCXLow RiskKLACLow RiskSANMMed RiskVIAVHigh RiskSMTCUnknown
AWI Price Drop (%)0

If Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Lam Research Corp. (LRCX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with AWI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AWI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AWI

Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AWI Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Armstrong World Industries, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$246M
EBITDA
$554M
FCF Conversion
44%
Reinvestment Rate
56%
44% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
20.6%
ROIC − WACC Spread
8.1%

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. converts 44% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 56% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 8.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1121$161.76$3,396.96
2026-04-22154$177.66$27,359.64
2026-04-2014$179.52$2,513.28
2026-03-3118$159.73$2,875.14
2026-03-2316$163.86$2,621.76
2026-03-209,753$165.39$1.6M
2026-02-24250$192.83$48,207.5
2026-02-1339$196.94$7,680.66
2026-01-261$187.28$187.28
2026-01-2371$189.04$13,421.84
2026-01-151$195.76$195.76
2025-11-1436$184.58$6,644.88
2025-11-0473$192.58$14,058.34

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AWI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.