Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 31.9x earnings — a 51% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — BMI is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 13.2. Beneish M-Score of -2.20 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Badger Meter, Inc. reflect a capital-efficient operator with robust profitability drivers, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread indicative of value creation above the cost of capital. DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are primarily fueled by strong operating leverage rather than financial engineering or asset churning; specifically, a net margin of 15.4% and gross margin of 41.7% suggest superior pricing power relative to peers in the Technology sector, while revenue growth accelerates at 10.9%. Quality metrics further support this narrative: an Altman Z-Score of 13.2 signals negligible bankruptcy risk, a Beneish M-Score of -2.20 indicates low probability of earnings manipulation, and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 confirms moderate financial strength without recent distress or aggressive accounting shifts.
Valuation analysis presents a divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models. The market assigns a forward P/E multiple of 31.9x, which sits significantly below the sector average of 63.0x, suggesting potential underpricing relative to industry peers despite similar growth profiles. However, this discount persists even when weighing against a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $167, implying that current market prices may not fully reflect the company's long-term cash flow generation capabilities or implied growth assumptions embedded in those models. The gap between the multiple compression and the sector mean warrants scrutiny regarding whether the market is appropriately pricing in future margin expansion versus temporary headwinds.
No specific risk factor deltas, insider trading activity data, or Fama-French alpha statistics were provided to further refine the risk-reward profile. Consequently, while the balance sheet appears resilient with low distress probabilities and earnings quality indicators are favorable, the absence of momentum metrics or style-factor exposure prevents a complete assessment of how this stock might perform under varying market regimes such as high-rate environments or value tilts.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $203 | $150 | $119 |
| 3% | $237 | $167 | $128 |
| 4% | $288 | $190 | $141 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $167 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BMI shares regardless of Badger Meter, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $245M of passive capital is structurally linked to BMI through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BMI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Badger Meter, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Bloom Energy Corp. Class A (BE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with BMI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BMI Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest BMI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BMI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Badger Meter, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Badger Meter, Inc. converts 78% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 5 | $115.04 | $575.2 |
| 2026-05-07 | 793 | $123.75 | $98,133.75 |
| 2026-05-06 | 1,289 | $121.09 | $156,085.01 |
| 2026-05-05 | 3 | $120.03 | $360.09 |
| 2026-04-24 | 53 | $123.00 | $6,519 |
| 2026-04-23 | 394 | $123.56 | $48,682.64 |
| 2026-04-20 | 41,167 | $115.54 | $4.8M |
| 2026-04-17 | 894 | $152.29 | $136,147.26 |
| 2026-04-07 | 14 | $155.42 | $2,175.88 |
| 2026-04-06 | 2,415 | $156.73 | $378,502.95 |
| 2026-04-02 | 686 | $154.21 | $105,788.06 |
| 2026-03-26 | 537 | $153.37 | $82,359.69 |
| 2026-03-23 | 62 | $147.94 | $9,172.28 |
| 2026-03-06 | 3,419 | $146.00 | $499,174 |
| 2026-03-05 | 5,432 | $149.11 | $809,965.52 |
| 2026-03-02 | 4,805 | $152.43 | $732,426.15 |
| 2026-02-27 | 565 | $156.17 | $88,236.05 |
| 2026-02-20 | 112 | $161.89 | $18,131.68 |
| 2026-02-12 | 7,251 | $156.92 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-02 | 31 | $146.58 | $4,543.98 |
| 2026-01-23 | 35 | $172.13 | $6,024.55 |
| 2026-01-22 | 50 | $170.14 | $8,507 |
| 2026-01-05 | 41 | $176.39 | $7,231.99 |
| 2025-12-08 | 25 | $180.14 | $4,503.5 |
| 2025-11-20 | 6,139 | $169.05 | $1.0M |
| 2025-11-06 | 13 | $186.19 | $2,420.47 |
| 2025-11-03 | 79 | $180.45 | $14,255.55 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare BMI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.