Stock vs Stock Comparison

Badger Meter, Inc. vs Microsoft Corporation

MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3.

BMI
MSFT$427.34

🏆 Tale of the Tape

35
BMIMSFT
15.4%Profitability (Net Margin)36.1%
31.9xValuation (P/E)26.8x
17.6%Efficiency (ROIC)20.8%
5/9Health (Piotroski F)5/9
13.2Safety (Altman Z)7.8
10.9%Growth (Rev YoY)14.9%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.11
0.36xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.80x
4.00%FCF Yield2.59%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricBMIMSFT
Market Cap$4.5B$3.34T
P/E Ratio31.9x26.8x
Forward P/E27.5x23.3x
P/B6.31x8.07x
Dividend Yield1.06%0.81%
Beta0.921.09

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBMIMSFT
DCF Fair Value$167.17$120.75
DCF Upside-68.6%
Piotroski F5/95/9
Altman Z13.237.76
Beneish M-2.20-2.57
FCF Yield4.00%2.59%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.1x
ROIC17.6%20.8%
WACC11.5%
ROIC – WACC9.3pp
Gross Margin41.7%68.8%
Net Margin15.4%36.1%
Rev Growth YoY10.9%14.9%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.11
Max Drawdown 3Y-33.9%
FCF Payout Ratio26%34%

BMI Price

Loading chart...

MSFT Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BMI found in:

SLYG0.42%
SDY0.22%
SPSM0.21%
VTWO0.11%
VBK0.10%
VGT0.06%
VIG0.02%
SPTM0.01%

MSFT found in:

VGT10.02%
IVW9.10%
SPYG8.88%
IWF8.82%
IGV8.79%
VUG8.76%
VONG8.69%
MGK8.69%
XLK8.48%
SCHG7.34%
QQQ7.17%
SPLG6.84%
OEF6.73%
IVV6.14%
DGRW6.07%
ESGV5.53%
ITOT5.43%
DIA5.13%
QUAL5.04%
JEPQ4.91%
VOO4.90%
SPY4.87%
SCHX4.69%
VONE4.60%
IWB4.59%
LRGF4.52%
SPTM4.50%
SCHB4.39%
VTI4.36%
IYW3.99%
VIG3.96%
DFAC3.92%
URTH3.24%
ACWI3.17%
DGRO2.91%
VT2.69%
QUS2.65%
MOAT2.37%
XNTK2.02%
CLOU1.97%
USMV1.56%
VFMV1.40%
XSW0.73%
SDY0.41%
RSP0.18%
ONEO0.10%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BMI vs MSFT: Head-to-Head Analysis

Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) represent two companies in the Technology sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, MSFT leads 5–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BMI generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 17.6% compared to MSFT's 20.8%. This suggests MSFT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

BMI appears in 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while MSFT appears in 46 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BMI or MSFT?

Our quantitative analysis compares BMI and MSFT across nine fundamental dimensions. MSFT wins the Tale of the Tape 5–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BMI and MSFT correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.