Compass, Inc. (COMP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Compass, Inc. present a paradoxical profile characterized by aggressive top-line expansion that has yet to translate into profitability. Despite revenue growth accelerating at 23.7% year-over-year and maintaining an 18.4% gross margin, the company operates with a net margin contraction of -0.8%, resulting in negative returns on invested capital (-3.9%) and equity (-7.4%). The DuPont decomposition reveals that this poor return is driven primarily by insufficient margins rather than inefficient asset turnover or excessive leverage; notably, the high 4.52x asset turnover suggests efficient utilization of assets to generate sales volume even as bottom-line economics deteriorate. While a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 indicates moderate financial strength and a Beneish M-Score of -2.85 points away from earnings manipulation concerns, the negative ROIC-WACC spread signals that current operations are destroying value despite strong growth momentum.
Valuation metrics reflect significant market optimism regarding future margin expansion or scale effects, with shares trading at a price-to-earnings multiple far exceeding the sector average of 89.5x given the company's current unprofitability. A discounted cash flow analysis implies a fair value of $12 per share; however, without knowing the current trading price relative to this anchor, it remains unclear whether the market is pricing in sufficient future growth or overestimating the durability of these negative earnings. The disconnect between robust 23.7% revenue compounding and sub-zero net margins suggests that the valuation premium relies heavily on assumptions about when operational leverage will finally flip positive rather than current cash flow generation capabilities.
Insider activity introduces a notable risk delta to this growth narrative, as $1,202,602 in net selling over the past 90 days indicates management is reducing exposure despite the bullish revenue trajectory and low manipulation scores. While the strong asset turnover and moderate Piotroski score mitigate some concerns about operational fragility, the combination of negative ROIC, significant insider outflows, and a valuation that vastly exceeds historical sector norms creates an asymmetric risk profile where downside potential may be constrained by fundamental earnings quality issues before any multiple compression occurs.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $15 | $11 | $9 |
| 3% | $18 | $12 | $9 |
| 4% | $22 | $14 | $10 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VNQ or VTWO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell COMP shares regardless of Compass, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $319M of passive capital is structurally linked to COMP through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on COMP's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Compass, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Compass, Inc. (COMP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with COMP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
COMP Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest COMP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
COMP Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Compass, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Compass, Inc. converts 371% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 633,089 | $8.74 | $5.5M |
| 2026-05-06 | 19,592 | $7.26 | $142,237.92 |
| 2026-05-04 | 10,918 | $7.39 | $80,684.02 |
| 2026-05-01 | 43,399 | $7.57 | $328,530.43 |
| 2026-04-29 | 280,528 | $7.89 | $2.2M |
| 2026-04-22 | 57 | $7.83 | $446.31 |
| 2026-04-21 | 11,789 | $8.08 | $95,255.12 |
| 2026-04-20 | 10,203 | $8.14 | $83,052.42 |
| 2026-03-20 | 626 | $8.13 | $5,089.38 |
| 2026-03-19 | 11,448 | $8.08 | $92,499.84 |
| 2026-03-16 | 55,660 | $8.28 | $460,864.8 |
| 2026-03-13 | 103,931 | $8.09 | $840,801.79 |
| 2026-03-12 | 139,429 | $8.63 | $1.2M |
| 2026-03-11 | 222,235 | $8.82 | $2.0M |
| 2026-03-05 | 41,428 | $9.49 | $393,151.72 |
| 2026-03-03 | 4 | $10.06 | $40.24 |
| 2026-03-02 | 1,680 | $9.75 | $16,380 |
| 2026-02-26 | 139,615 | $9.51 | $1.3M |
| 2026-02-25 | 5 | $9.43 | $47.15 |
| 2026-02-24 | 700 | $9.08 | $6,356 |
| 2026-02-23 | 7,148 | $10.30 | $73,624.4 |
| 2026-02-20 | 17,772 | $10.43 | $185,361.96 |
| 2026-02-18 | 1,451 | $10.10 | $14,655.1 |
| 2026-02-09 | 463 | $12.27 | $5,681.01 |
| 2026-02-02 | 600 | $12.52 | $7,512 |
| 2026-01-27 | 230,200 | $13.58 | $3.1M |
| 2026-01-20 | 2,093 | $12.86 | $26,915.98 |
| 2026-01-12 | 1,892,670 | $12.84 | $24.3M |
| 2026-01-09 | 1,071,614 | $12.26 | $13.1M |
| 2026-01-08 | 643,359 | $11.84 | $7.6M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare COMP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.