Consumer Defensive

Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR)

$9.8B
Market Cap
157.8
P/E Ratio
1.21
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 2.4 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.93 CleanROIC−WACC -7.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

DAR trades at 157.8x earnings — a 385% premium to its sector average of 32.6x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Darling Ingredients Inc. reveal a significant divergence between operational efficiency and capital allocation effectiveness, highlighted by an ROIC-WACC spread of -7.5%. This negative spread indicates that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital, despite maintaining robust profitability drivers such as a 24.0% gross margin and accelerating revenue growth of 7.4% YoY. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests strong financial health and integrity—further supported by a low Beneish M-Score of -2.93—the Altman Z-Score of 2.4 places the firm in the grey zone regarding bankruptcy risk, suggesting potential liquidity or leverage constraints that counterbalance its high-quality earnings profile. The DuPont decomposition implies that while margins are healthy, the return on invested capital is insufficient to cover the weighted average cost of capital at 9.9%, creating a structural drag on equity value generation until operating leverage improves significantly.

Valuation metrics present a stark disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic worth estimates derived from discounted cash flow models. The stock trades at an exorbitant P/E ratio of 157.8x, which is nearly five times the sector average of 33.9x, signaling that investors are aggressively pricing in future growth expectations that have not yet materialized into current earnings power. This extreme multiple compression relative to historical norms and peer valuations suggests a high risk of mean reversion if revenue acceleration slows or margin expansion falters. The DCF fair value estimate of $98 stands in sharp contrast to the prevailing market price, implying that the current valuation assumes an unrealistic trajectory for cash flows given the negative ROIC-WACC spread and modest net margins hovering at just 1.0%.

The risk-reward profile appears skewed heavily toward downside potential due to the combination of aggressive pricing and weak capital efficiency. Although the low Beneish M-Score mitigates concerns regarding earnings manipulation, the fundamental inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital creates a persistent headwind for shareholder value accumulation. The market's willingness to sustain such elevated multiples despite these operational inefficiencies suggests that sentiment is currently decoupled from underlying fundamentals, leaving the stock vulnerable to any deterioration in growth rates or margin compression within the consumer defensive sector.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.9%9.9%11.9%
2%$125$86$62
3%$151$98$70
4%$190$115$79

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $98 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

157.8x
DAR P/E
32.6x
Sector Avg
+385%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.4
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.93
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

24.0%
Gross Margin
1.0%
Net Margin
2.4%
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -7.5%— Negative spread.
+7.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-77.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
679.2M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.14x
Debt / Equity
1.50x
Current Ratio
1.3x
Interest Coverage
4.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.02%
FCF Yield
791.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.16
Act: $-0.12
-178.1%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.17
-4.9%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.22
Act: $0.16
-28.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.35
Act: $0.75
+113.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

15.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.06
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$62.38
52W High
$26.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$618M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding DAR
0.15%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$417B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or VDC, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DAR shares regardless of Darling Ingredients Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $618M of passive capital is structurally linked to DAR through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on DAR's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Darling Ingredients Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

DAR Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
DAREpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskPGLow RiskKOLow RiskPEPLow Risk
DAR Price Drop (%)0

If Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DAR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

DAR Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
DAR

Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

DAR Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Darling Ingredients Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$679M
EBITDA
$792M
FCF Conversion
86%
Reinvestment Rate
14%
86% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
2.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-7.5%

Darling Ingredients Inc. converts 86% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-7.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1213,942$63.82$889,778.44
2026-04-0231,698$62.16$2.0M
2026-04-012$61.85$123.7
2026-03-2417,605$56.46$993,978.3
2026-03-23689$55.14$37,991.46
2026-02-23146,997$51.60$7.6M
2026-02-1330,224$50.31$1.5M
2026-02-10120$48.40$5,808
2026-01-296,987$44.02$307,567.74
2026-01-2816,448$44.00$723,712
2026-01-2095$39.57$3,759.15
2026-01-0847,730$36.80$1.8M
2025-12-225,295$34.37$181,989.15
2025-12-17400$35.03$14,012
2025-12-1011,063$35.43$391,962.09
2025-11-26883$35.23$31,108.09
2025-11-2511,051$33.71$372,529.21
2025-11-24200$33.38$6,676
2025-11-21250$32.13$8,032.5
2025-11-18230$34.43$7,918.9
2025-11-124$34.31$137.24
2025-11-1031$32.53$1,008.43
2025-11-07981$31.92$31,313.52
2025-11-062$32.22$64.44
2025-11-05116$32.56$3,776.96

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare DAR to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.