Consumer Defensive

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)

$3.7B
Market Cap
34.9
P/E Ratio
1.68
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 6.2 SafeBeneish M -2.48 CleanROIC−WACC -2.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

ELF trades at 34.9x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 32.6x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 6.2.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for e.l.f. Beauty presents a notable drag on value creation, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.4%, indicating that the firm is currently destroying economic value relative to its cost of capital despite generating strong top-line momentum with 28.3% year-over-year revenue growth. This operational profile is underpinned by exceptional pricing power and scalability, reflected in a robust 71.2% gross margin and an 8.5% net margin; however, the DuPont components suggest that this profitability is not yet being leveraged into superior returns on invested capital. Financial integrity appears sound with a high Altman Z-Score of 6.2 signaling low bankruptcy risk and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.48 suggesting earnings are likely free from manipulation, while the Piotroski F-score of 6/9 indicates solid fundamental health without reaching peak financial strength conditions.

Valuation metrics place the stock at a premium multiple relative to its historical trajectory but remain broadly inline with sector peers trading at an average P/E of 33.9x; the current 34.9x forward earnings multiple suggests the market is pricing in sustained high-growth execution rather than value reversion. A discounted cash flow analysis anchors fair value at $41, implying that if growth assumptions hold and capital efficiency improves to close the negative ROIC-WACC gap, there may be room for expansion from current levels. The divergence between aggressive revenue acceleration and sub-optimal return on invested assets creates a scenario where valuation support relies heavily on future margin leverage or asset turnover improvements rather than immediate multiple compression.

Risk assessment reveals a mixed profile: while insider activity data is absent to gauge management alignment, the combination of high growth velocity and negative capital efficiency introduces execution risk if operating leverage fails to materialize in subsequent periods. The stock's positioning within the Consumer Defensive sector at a premium valuation requires sustained validation that current sales momentum can translate into improved absolute returns on equity before the market deems the multiple justified beyond its historical norms.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →12.3%14.3%16.3%
2%$47$38$32
3%$51$41$34
4%$56$44$36

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $41 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

34.9x
ELF P/E
32.6x
Sector Avg
+7%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
6.2
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.48
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

71.2%
Gross Margin
8.5%
Net Margin
12.0%
ROIC
14.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.4%— Negative spread.
+28.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-12.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
115.3M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.64x
Debt / Equity
3.05x
Current Ratio
9.7x
Interest Coverage
0.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.04%
FCF Yield
206.2M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.72
Act: $0.78
+8.3%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.84
Act: $0.89
+6.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.57
Act: $0.68
+19.9%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.72
Act: $1.24
+71.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.14
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$150.99
52W High
$49.40
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$116M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ELF
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$107B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLY or VDC, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ELF shares regardless of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $116M of passive capital is structurally linked to ELF through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ELF's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ELF Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ELFEpicenterVBKETFMDYETFSPMDETFWMTLow RiskCOSTLow RiskPGLow RiskKOLow RiskPEPLow Risk
ELF Price Drop (%)0

If e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ELF. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ELF Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ELF

Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ELF Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$115M
EBITDA
$206M
FCF Conversion
56%
Reinvestment Rate
44%
56% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
12.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.4%

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. converts 56% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-14165,816$53.74$8.9M
2026-05-132,611$55.66$145,328.26
2026-05-0877$61.79$4,757.83
2026-05-0722,422$61.43$1.4M
2026-05-055,459$61.85$337,639.15
2026-04-30346$61.08$21,133.68
2026-04-29648$63.00$40,824
2026-04-24137$66.23$9,073.51
2026-04-216$68.42$410.52
2026-04-0921$61.77$1,297.17
2026-03-268,063$69.65$561,587.95
2026-03-23100$72.50$7,250
2026-03-17148$73.62$10,895.76
2026-03-1643,915$73.41$3.2M
2026-03-09149$82.44$12,283.56
2026-03-0347$81.64$3,837.08
2026-03-02691$92.05$63,606.55
2026-02-2743,892$94.65$4.2M
2026-02-2365$94.02$6,111.3
2026-02-191,393$88.04$122,639.72
2026-02-174$81.50$326
2026-02-1133,251$73.26$2.4M
2026-02-0622,179$76.86$1.7M
2026-02-051,408$84.63$119,159.04
2026-02-046$84.81$508.86
2026-01-262,816$94.16$265,154.56
2026-01-201,727$89.99$155,412.73
2026-01-162,579$89.18$229,995.22
2026-01-12727$87.02$63,263.54
2026-01-0821,468$82.10$1.8M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ELF to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.