Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 8.4x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — ESNT is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of Essent Group Ltd. presents a distinct profile characterized by high profitability margins but constrained asset utilization. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 12.0% return on equity is driven almost exclusively by an exceptional net margin of 53.6%, while low asset turnover at 0.17x and moderate leverage (equity multiplier of 1.29x) indicate a business model reliant on operational efficiency rather than volume or financial engineering. This fundamental strength, however, is tempered by a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, suggesting that while the company maintains reasonable balance sheet stability with an Altman-like profile implied by its solvency metrics, it lacks recent momentum in profitability growth given the stagnant revenue expansion of only 1.7% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics currently position the stock at a significant discount relative to both historical norms and peer comparisons, trading at a forward P/E of 8.4x versus a sector average of 18.3x. This compression implies that the market is pricing in persistent stagnation or elevated distress risk despite the company's robust margin profile. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $210 per share, which would require substantial multiple expansion or accelerated growth to be realized at current price levels; conversely, if the low P/E accurately reflects future earnings deterioration, the DCF premium may not materialize. The absence of insider activity over the last 90 days further signals a neutral stance among management, offering no clear directional signal regarding confidence in near-term catalysts.
From a risk-reward perspective, the divergence between the high-margin operational engine and the sluggish top-line growth creates an asymmetric setup dependent on whether revenue inflection occurs soon. The low P/E offers a margin of safety if fundamentals stabilize, yet the modest Piotroski score and flat revenue trajectory introduce uncertainty regarding future earnings sustainability without further data points on asset quality or market share dynamics.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.7% | 9.7% | 11.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $258 | $187 | $146 |
| 3% | $304 | $210 | $159 |
| 4% | $376 | $240 | $175 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $210 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ESNT shares regardless of Essent Group Ltd.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $278M of passive capital is structurally linked to ESNT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ESNT's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Essent Group Ltd. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS (PNFP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ESNT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ESNT Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ESNT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ESNT Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Essent Group Ltd. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Essent Group Ltd. converts 99% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 2 | $59.94 | $119.88 |
| 2026-04-30 | 3 | $63.96 | $191.88 |
| 2026-04-23 | 4 | $63.15 | $252.6 |
| 2026-04-20 | 24 | $62.05 | $1,489.2 |
| 2026-03-30 | 486 | $57.74 | $28,061.64 |
| 2026-03-26 | 209 | $57.95 | $12,111.55 |
| 2026-03-25 | 29 | $57.41 | $1,664.89 |
| 2026-03-23 | 29 | $57.16 | $1,657.64 |
| 2026-03-17 | 10,679 | $57.94 | $618,741.26 |
| 2026-02-09 | 963 | $65.28 | $62,864.64 |
| 2026-02-04 | 9 | $63.05 | $567.45 |
| 2026-02-02 | 57 | $62.92 | $3,586.44 |
| 2026-01-08 | 2 | $63.94 | $127.88 |
| 2025-12-12 | 25 | $64.48 | $1,612 |
| 2025-11-12 | 17,037 | $62.06 | $1.1M |
| 2025-10-31 | 20 | $60.68 | $1,213.6 |
| 2025-10-14 | 201 | $59.25 | $11,909.25 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ESNT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.