Financial Services

Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT)

$5.5B
Market Cap
8.4
P/E Ratio
0.87
Beta
2.42%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 3.5 SafeROIC−WACC -0.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 8.4x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — ESNT is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.5.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of Essent Group Ltd. presents a distinct profile characterized by high profitability margins but constrained asset utilization. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 12.0% return on equity is driven almost exclusively by an exceptional net margin of 53.6%, while low asset turnover at 0.17x and moderate leverage (equity multiplier of 1.29x) indicate a business model reliant on operational efficiency rather than volume or financial engineering. This fundamental strength, however, is tempered by a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, suggesting that while the company maintains reasonable balance sheet stability with an Altman-like profile implied by its solvency metrics, it lacks recent momentum in profitability growth given the stagnant revenue expansion of only 1.7% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics currently position the stock at a significant discount relative to both historical norms and peer comparisons, trading at a forward P/E of 8.4x versus a sector average of 18.3x. This compression implies that the market is pricing in persistent stagnation or elevated distress risk despite the company's robust margin profile. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $210 per share, which would require substantial multiple expansion or accelerated growth to be realized at current price levels; conversely, if the low P/E accurately reflects future earnings deterioration, the DCF premium may not materialize. The absence of insider activity over the last 90 days further signals a neutral stance among management, offering no clear directional signal regarding confidence in near-term catalysts.

From a risk-reward perspective, the divergence between the high-margin operational engine and the sluggish top-line growth creates an asymmetric setup dependent on whether revenue inflection occurs soon. The low P/E offers a margin of safety if fundamentals stabilize, yet the modest Piotroski score and flat revenue trajectory introduce uncertainty regarding future earnings sustainability without further data points on asset quality or market share dynamics.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.7%9.7%11.7%
2%$258$187$146
3%$304$210$159
4%$376$240$175

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $210 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

8.4x
ESNT P/E
19.2x
Sector Avg
-56%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
3.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

53.6%
Net Margin
9.1%
ROIC
9.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -0.7%— Negative spread.
+1.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-5.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
848.7M
Free Cash Flow
14%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

53.6%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.17x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.29x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
12.0%
Return on Equity
✅ ROE driven primarily by strong profit margins — a sign of pricing power.

Balance Sheet Health

0.29x
Debt / Equity
26.1x
Interest Coverage
0.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
14.47%
FCF Yield
859.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.65
Act: $1.69
+2.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.71
Act: $1.93
+13.0%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $1.77
Act: $1.67
-5.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.74
Act: $1.60
-7.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.96
Price/Book
734610
Avg Volume
$67.09
52W High
$51.61
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$278M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding ESNT
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$323B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KBE or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ESNT shares regardless of Essent Group Ltd.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $278M of passive capital is structurally linked to ESNT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ESNT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Essent Group Ltd. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ESNT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ESNTEpicenterVYMETFVXFETFVBRETFPNFPHigh RiskEWBCHigh RiskFHNHigh RiskWBSHigh RiskWTFCHigh Risk
ESNT Price Drop (%)0

If Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS (PNFP) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with ESNT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ESNT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ESNT

Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ESNT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Essent Group Ltd. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$849M
EBITDA
$860M
FCF Conversion
99%
Reinvestment Rate
1%
99% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-0.6%

Essent Group Ltd. converts 99% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-142$59.94$119.88
2026-04-303$63.96$191.88
2026-04-234$63.15$252.6
2026-04-2024$62.05$1,489.2
2026-03-30486$57.74$28,061.64
2026-03-26209$57.95$12,111.55
2026-03-2529$57.41$1,664.89
2026-03-2329$57.16$1,657.64
2026-03-1710,679$57.94$618,741.26
2026-02-09963$65.28$62,864.64
2026-02-049$63.05$567.45
2026-02-0257$62.92$3,586.44
2026-01-082$63.94$127.88
2025-12-1225$64.48$1,612
2025-11-1217,037$62.06$1.1M
2025-10-3120$60.68$1,213.6
2025-10-14201$59.25$11,909.25

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare ESNT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.