EXP (EXP)

$5.8B
Market Cap
13.8
P/E Ratio
1.35
Beta
0.55%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 4.1 SafeBeneish M -2.54 CleanROIC−WACC +5.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics suggest a capital allocation efficiency that exceeds the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of 5.1%, indicating value creation potential despite stagnant revenue growth of just 0.1% year-over-year. The DuPont decomposition is likely driven primarily by margin expansion rather than turnover or leverage, given the robust net margin of 20.5% and gross margin of 29.8%. Credit quality appears stable with an Altman Z-Score of 4.1, while earnings integrity metrics are mixed; a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial strength but lacks the momentum characteristics of high-quality growth firms, whereas the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.54 reduces concerns regarding potential earnings manipulation.

Valuation multiples sit at 13.8x P/E, which implies a market discount relative to the company's strong profitability profile if sector peers trade at higher multiples for similar margin structures. The DCF model anchors fair value at $56, suggesting that current pricing may not fully reflect the implied growth embedded in its capital returns unless macro assumptions regarding risk-free rates or terminal values have shifted significantly downward. This disconnect between high margins and flat top-line revenue creates a scenario where valuation is sensitive to any reversal in sales momentum rather than margin compression alone.

The risk/reward profile presents a dichotomy: while the low P/E offers downside protection against earnings misses, the lack of revenue acceleration limits upside catalysts absent significant multiple expansion or operational turnarounds. Investors must weigh whether the current price adequately compensates for the stagnation in top-line growth against the safety margin provided by the wide ROIC spread and credible balance sheet metrics captured in the Altman score.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →9.5%11.5%13.5%
2%$71$49$35
3%$83$56$39
4%$99$64$44

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $56 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
4.1
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.54
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

29.8%
Gross Margin
20.5%
Net Margin
16.6%
ROIC
11.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +5.1%— Positive value creation spread.
+0.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
353.3M
Free Cash Flow
10%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.24x
Debt / Equity
2.73x
Current Ratio
15.0x
Interest Coverage
1.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.01%
FCF Yield
792.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $2.49
Act: $2.00
-19.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $3.65
Act: $3.76
+3.1%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $4.37
Act: $4.23
-3.2%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $3.36
Act: $3.22
-4.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

14.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.85
Price/Book
490035
Avg Volume
$243.64
52W High
$171.99
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$381M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding EXP
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$401B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VAW or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell EXP shares regardless of EXP's individual fundamentals. We estimate $381M of passive capital is structurally linked to EXP through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on EXP's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in EXP to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

EXP Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
EXPEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFLINLow RiskNEMLow RiskFCXLow RiskCRHLow RiskSHWLow Risk
EXP Price Drop (%)0

If EXP (EXP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with EXP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

EXP Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
EXP

Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

EXP Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does EXP convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$353M
EBITDA
$793M
FCF Conversion
45%
Reinvestment Rate
55%
45% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
16.6%
ROIC − WACC Spread
5.1%

EXP converts 45% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 55% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-13109$202.03$22,021.27
2026-05-111,400$210.45$294,630
2026-05-0726$217.06$5,643.56
2026-04-303$204.56$613.68
2026-04-24163$208.40$33,969.2
2026-04-2026$201.28$5,233.28
2026-04-14196$201.83$39,558.68
2026-04-07100$185.66$18,566
2026-04-06664$187.96$124,805.44
2026-03-31707$181.50$128,320.5
2026-03-27181$183.92$33,289.52
2026-03-2311$173.07$1,903.77
2026-03-1743$187.23$8,050.89
2026-03-09113$196.79$22,237.27
2026-02-25765$231.69$177,242.85
2026-02-192$231.49$462.98
2026-02-09168$225.85$37,942.8
2026-02-0317$209.47$3,560.99
2026-01-21987$226.18$223,239.66
2026-01-151,579$231.81$366,027.99
2026-01-076$216.73$1,300.38
2025-12-228,563$217.55$1.9M
2025-12-017,797$223.72$1.7M
2025-11-254,917$211.15$1.0M
2025-11-14310$202.91$62,902.1
2025-11-13960$207.30$199,008
2025-11-12275$205.69$56,564.75
2025-11-103,052$206.96$631,641.92
2025-11-0513$208.40$2,709.2
2025-11-03236$212.32$50,107.52

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare EXP to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.