EXP (EXP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics suggest a capital allocation efficiency that exceeds the cost of equity, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of 5.1%, indicating value creation potential despite stagnant revenue growth of just 0.1% year-over-year. The DuPont decomposition is likely driven primarily by margin expansion rather than turnover or leverage, given the robust net margin of 20.5% and gross margin of 29.8%. Credit quality appears stable with an Altman Z-Score of 4.1, while earnings integrity metrics are mixed; a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial strength but lacks the momentum characteristics of high-quality growth firms, whereas the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.54 reduces concerns regarding potential earnings manipulation.
Valuation multiples sit at 13.8x P/E, which implies a market discount relative to the company's strong profitability profile if sector peers trade at higher multiples for similar margin structures. The DCF model anchors fair value at $56, suggesting that current pricing may not fully reflect the implied growth embedded in its capital returns unless macro assumptions regarding risk-free rates or terminal values have shifted significantly downward. This disconnect between high margins and flat top-line revenue creates a scenario where valuation is sensitive to any reversal in sales momentum rather than margin compression alone.
The risk/reward profile presents a dichotomy: while the low P/E offers downside protection against earnings misses, the lack of revenue acceleration limits upside catalysts absent significant multiple expansion or operational turnarounds. Investors must weigh whether the current price adequately compensates for the stagnation in top-line growth against the safety margin provided by the wide ROIC spread and credible balance sheet metrics captured in the Altman score.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.5% | 11.5% | 13.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $71 | $49 | $35 |
| 3% | $83 | $56 | $39 |
| 4% | $99 | $64 | $44 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $56 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VAW or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell EXP shares regardless of EXP's individual fundamentals. We estimate $381M of passive capital is structurally linked to EXP through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on EXP's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in EXP to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If EXP (EXP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with EXP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
EXP Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest EXP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
EXP Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does EXP convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
EXP converts 45% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 55% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 109 | $202.03 | $22,021.27 |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,400 | $210.45 | $294,630 |
| 2026-05-07 | 26 | $217.06 | $5,643.56 |
| 2026-04-30 | 3 | $204.56 | $613.68 |
| 2026-04-24 | 163 | $208.40 | $33,969.2 |
| 2026-04-20 | 26 | $201.28 | $5,233.28 |
| 2026-04-14 | 196 | $201.83 | $39,558.68 |
| 2026-04-07 | 100 | $185.66 | $18,566 |
| 2026-04-06 | 664 | $187.96 | $124,805.44 |
| 2026-03-31 | 707 | $181.50 | $128,320.5 |
| 2026-03-27 | 181 | $183.92 | $33,289.52 |
| 2026-03-23 | 11 | $173.07 | $1,903.77 |
| 2026-03-17 | 43 | $187.23 | $8,050.89 |
| 2026-03-09 | 113 | $196.79 | $22,237.27 |
| 2026-02-25 | 765 | $231.69 | $177,242.85 |
| 2026-02-19 | 2 | $231.49 | $462.98 |
| 2026-02-09 | 168 | $225.85 | $37,942.8 |
| 2026-02-03 | 17 | $209.47 | $3,560.99 |
| 2026-01-21 | 987 | $226.18 | $223,239.66 |
| 2026-01-15 | 1,579 | $231.81 | $366,027.99 |
| 2026-01-07 | 6 | $216.73 | $1,300.38 |
| 2025-12-22 | 8,563 | $217.55 | $1.9M |
| 2025-12-01 | 7,797 | $223.72 | $1.7M |
| 2025-11-25 | 4,917 | $211.15 | $1.0M |
| 2025-11-14 | 310 | $202.91 | $62,902.1 |
| 2025-11-13 | 960 | $207.30 | $199,008 |
| 2025-11-12 | 275 | $205.69 | $56,564.75 |
| 2025-11-10 | 3,052 | $206.96 | $631,641.92 |
| 2025-11-05 | 13 | $208.40 | $2,709.2 |
| 2025-11-03 | 236 | $212.32 | $50,107.52 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare EXP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.