FIVE (FIVE)

$12.3B
Market Cap
34.4
P/E Ratio
1.11
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 4.8 SafeBeneish M -2.63 CleanROIC−WACC -1.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 4.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics reveal a company generating robust top-line expansion at 22.9% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins of 36.0%, yet the capital allocation efficiency remains constrained. The return on invested capital sits at 9.1%, falling short of the estimated cost of capital at 10.7%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction rather than accretion despite strong revenue momentum. This dynamic is further illuminated by the DuPont decomposition, where high leverage or low asset turnover likely suppresses overall returns given the net margin of only 7.5%. However, financial stability metrics present a mixed picture; while the Altman Z-Score of 4.8 indicates a safe distance from bankruptcy and the Beneish M-Score of -2.63 points to high earnings credibility, the exceptional Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 suggests strong balance sheet strength that contrasts sharply with the negative ROIC-WACC spread.

Valuation multiples reflect significant market optimism relative to historical norms and sector peers, as evidenced by a current price-to-earnings ratio of 34.4x. This premium multiple appears disconnected from the underlying capital efficiency metrics, particularly given the DCF fair value estimate of $219 implies a growth trajectory that may not be fully supported by the current -1.6% spread between returns and costs. The market is pricing in substantial future improvements to operating leverage or margin expansion, assuming that the 7.5% net margins can scale alongside revenue without eroding capital efficiency.

The risk profile presents an interesting divergence where fundamental strength scores suggest resilience against distress, yet the negative economic value added creates a structural headwind for long-term shareholder returns unless operational mechanics improve. The high Piotroski score mitigates downside risk regarding financial deterioration, but investors must weigh this stability against the valuation premium and the current inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8.7%10.7%12.7%
2%$268$197$152
3%$310$219$166
4%$371$249$183

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $219 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
4.8
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.63
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

36.0%
Gross Margin
7.5%
Net Margin
9.1%
ROIC
10.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.6%— Negative spread.
+22.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+41.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
411.7M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

1.25x
Debt / Equity
2.01x
Current Ratio
1.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.09%
FCF Yield
649.5M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.83
Act: $0.86
+3.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.63
Act: $0.81
+29.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.26
Act: $0.68
+165.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $4.00
Act: $4.31
+7.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

24.6
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
5.61
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$237.50
52W High
$52.38
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$767M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding FIVE
0.20%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$386B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FIVE shares regardless of FIVE's individual fundamentals. We estimate $767M of passive capital is structurally linked to FIVE through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on FIVE's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in FIVE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

FIVE Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
FIVEEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBKETFFLEXMed RiskBURLLow RiskFTILow RiskTWLOLow RiskDKSMed Risk
FIVE Price Drop (%)0

If FIVE (FIVE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with FIVE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

FIVE Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
FIVE

Float lock-up computed from 14 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

FIVE Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does FIVE convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$412M
EBITDA
$650M
FCF Conversion
63%
Reinvestment Rate
37%
63% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.6%

FIVE converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-21113$247.71$27,991.23
2026-04-20323$236.26$76,311.98
2026-04-171$225.06$225.06
2026-04-133,010$217.37$654,283.7
2026-04-1025,264$225.19$5.7M
2026-04-0826$226.53$5,889.78
2026-03-232,042$227.42$464,391.64
2026-03-1322,798$217.03$4.9M
2026-03-0617$221.65$3,768.05
2026-03-024$223.53$894.12
2026-02-23556$220.09$122,370.04
2026-02-04385$196.73$75,741.05
2026-02-02619$191.64$118,625.16
2026-01-30200$188.39$37,678
2026-01-2943$185.42$7,973.06
2026-01-2810$187.24$1,872.4
2026-01-23733$191.33$140,244.89
2026-01-20100$196.69$19,669
2026-01-122$195.57$391.14
2026-01-0514$193.45$2,708.3
2025-12-231$186.54$186.54
2025-12-22380$182.07$69,186.6
2025-12-199$182.04$1,638.36
2025-12-11259$177.16$45,884.44
2025-12-05126$168.42$21,220.92
2025-12-04822$163.15$134,109.3
2025-12-01100$164.89$16,489
2025-11-2137$149.19$5,520.03
2025-11-201,212$148.35$179,800.2

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare FIVE to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.