MDU (MDU)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 1.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company's capital allocation efficiency appears constrained, as indicated by a low Return on Invested Capital of 3.6%, which suggests limited value creation relative to the cost of equity despite a moderate Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signaling average financial strength. The DuPont decomposition reveals that earnings per share are primarily driven by robust net margins at 10.2% rather than operational efficiency or leverage, evidenced by a low asset turnover ratio of 0.25x and an equity multiplier of only 2.75x. While the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.71 points to low earnings manipulation risk, the combination of sluggish ROIC and modest revenue growth of 6.7% implies that current profitability is not expanding rapidly enough to justify significant multiple expansion without improved asset productivity or margin acceleration.
Valuation metrics currently reflect a premium stance relative to historical norms and sector peers, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 22.2x suggesting the market prices in expectations for sustained high-margin performance rather than growth via volume. This valuation compression occurs despite the absence of explicit DCF fair value calculations or implied growth rates in the provided dataset, indicating that investors are likely relying on the stability offered by double-digit margins to offset concerns over capital efficiency. The disconnect between a P/E multiple exceeding 20x and an ROIC below 4% creates a structural tension where earnings yield lags behind the cost of equity, potentially limiting upside unless operating leverage improves or asset turnover accelerates significantly in future periods.
Insider activity provides a modest counterweight to valuation concerns, with $104,225 net buying over the last ninety days indicating some internal confidence despite the mixed fundamental profile. However, without additional data on Fama-French alpha factors or specific risk factor deltas, it remains unclear whether this insider flow compensates for the capital allocation inefficiencies highlighted by the low ROIC. The synthesis of these signals suggests a scenario where earnings quality is defensible due to strong margins and clean accounting scores, yet total shareholder return potential may be capped until the firm can demonstrate better deployment of its asset base or achieve higher growth rates that justify the current equity premium.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or VPU, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MDU shares regardless of MDU's individual fundamentals. We estimate $170M of passive capital is structurally linked to MDU through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MDU's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MDU to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MDU (MDU) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MDU. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MDU Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest MDU Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MDU Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MDU convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MDU converts -57% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 157% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 2,877 | $22.80 | $65,595.6 |
| 2026-05-11 | 66 | $22.49 | $1,484.34 |
| 2026-05-08 | 66 | $22.47 | $1,483.02 |
| 2026-05-07 | 5,491 | $22.31 | $122,504.21 |
| 2026-05-06 | 97 | $22.46 | $2,178.62 |
| 2026-04-24 | 281 | $21.94 | $6,165.14 |
| 2026-04-23 | 1,565 | $21.32 | $33,365.8 |
| 2026-04-15 | 59 | $22.00 | $1,298 |
| 2026-04-14 | 135 | $21.69 | $2,928.15 |
| 2026-04-13 | 15 | $22.34 | $335.1 |
| 2026-04-06 | 44,549 | $21.32 | $949,784.68 |
| 2026-04-01 | 423 | $20.72 | $8,764.56 |
| 2026-03-27 | 170 | $20.63 | $3,507.1 |
| 2026-03-26 | 620 | $20.55 | $12,741 |
| 2026-03-23 | 5 | $19.65 | $98.25 |
| 2026-03-12 | 1,952 | $20.97 | $40,933.44 |
| 2026-03-11 | 1,632 | $21.02 | $34,304.64 |
| 2026-03-05 | 7,043 | $20.85 | $146,846.55 |
| 2026-02-27 | 244 | $20.44 | $4,987.36 |
| 2026-02-26 | 100 | $20.38 | $2,038 |
| 2026-02-11 | 699 | $20.32 | $14,203.68 |
| 2026-02-10 | 25,572 | $20.12 | $514,508.64 |
| 2026-02-06 | 26 | $20.16 | $524.16 |
| 2025-12-31 | 8,625 | $19.74 | $170,257.5 |
| 2025-12-30 | 6,965 | $19.78 | $137,767.7 |
| 2025-12-29 | 8,475 | $19.68 | $166,788 |
| 2025-12-26 | 1,650 | $19.64 | $32,406 |
| 2025-12-23 | 394 | $19.47 | $7,671.18 |
| 2025-12-18 | 1,287 | $19.39 | $24,954.93 |
| 2025-12-16 | 49 | $19.56 | $958.44 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare MDU to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.