MEDP (MEDP)

$13.0B
Market Cap
30.0
P/E Ratio
1.46
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 6.8 SafeBeneish M -2.87 CleanROIC−WACC +53.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 6.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of MEDP reveal a robust capital allocation efficiency, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of +53.2%, indicating the company generates returns on invested capital significantly exceeding its cost of equity. This high-quality earnings profile is further corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.87, which collectively signal strong financial health with minimal likelihood of earnings manipulation. The DuPont decomposition suggests that the elevated ROE is primarily driven by operational leverage rather than excessive debt or margin compression, as reflected in healthy gross margins of 30.1% and net margins of 17.8%. Additionally, revenue growth accelerating at a 20.0% annual rate supports the sustainability of these profitability metrics without relying on aggressive balance sheet expansion, while an Altman Z-Score of 6.8 places the firm well within the safe zone for bankruptcy risk assessment.

Valuation multiples currently stand at 30.0x forward earnings, a premium that must be weighed against the implied growth rate embedded in the DCF fair value model suggesting a target price of $547. This multiple expansion is not merely speculative; it appears justified by the combination of double-digit revenue acceleration and superior capital efficiency relative to peers where such spreads are typically compressed. However, the market's willingness to pay this premium assumes that current margin trends persist and that future cash flows will materialize in line with the high-growth assumptions required to bridge the gap between current pricing and intrinsic value derived from discounted cash flow analysis.

While specific risk factor deltas or insider activity data were not provided for synthesis, the combination of a high Piotroski score and low Beneish M-score mitigates typical fundamental risks associated with earnings quality. The primary uncertainty lies in whether the market's valuation ceiling can sustain itself if revenue growth decelerates from its current 20.0% trajectory or if margin compression occurs despite the company's strong operating leverage. Investors must determine if the implied return profile justifies the elevated multiple relative to historical norms and sector averages, balancing the safety of low distress probability against the sensitivity of valuation to growth assumptions.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →11.7%13.7%15.7%
2%$628$511$429
3%$684$547$453
4%$755$589$481

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $547 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
6.8
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.87
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

30.1%
Gross Margin
17.8%
Net Margin
66.9%
ROIC
13.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +53.2%— Positive value creation spread.
+20.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+11.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
681.9M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

3.30x
Debt / Equity
0.74x
Current Ratio
-0.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.38%
FCF Yield
563.1M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $3.07
Act: $3.67
+19.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $3.00
Act: $3.10
+3.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $3.57
Act: $3.86
+8.1%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $4.23
Act: $4.67
+10.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

24.0
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
28.41
Price/Book
333871
Avg Volume
$628.92
52W High
$250.05
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$590M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding MEDP
0.14%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$426B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYG or VFQY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MEDP shares regardless of MEDP's individual fundamentals. We estimate $590M of passive capital is structurally linked to MEDP through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MEDP's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MEDP to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MEDP Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MEDPEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVONGETFFLEXMed RiskFTILow RiskTWLOLow RiskCWLow RiskNVTLow Risk
MEDP Price Drop (%)0

If MEDP (MEDP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with MEDP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MEDP Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MEDP

Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MEDP Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MEDP convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$682M
EBITDA
$563M
FCF Conversion
121%
Reinvestment Rate
-21%
121% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
66.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
53.2%

MEDP converts 121% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 53.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-08506$428.71$216,927.26
2026-05-047$417.54$2,922.78
2026-05-01800$418.66$334,928
2026-04-292,466$409.65$1.0M
2026-04-225$514.90$2,574.5
2026-04-20110$520.60$57,266
2026-04-1725$515.65$12,891.25
2026-04-104$501.50$2,006
2026-04-0819$508.52$9,661.88
2026-04-074$496.00$1,984
2026-03-2755$466.60$25,663
2026-03-232$452.51$905.02
2026-03-2043$460.92$19,819.56
2026-03-09240$470.59$112,941.6
2026-03-064$469.38$1,877.52
2026-02-1278$423.93$33,066.54
2026-02-04126$568.53$71,634.78
2026-02-0316$588.17$9,410.72
2026-01-2727,119$602.06$16.3M
2026-01-211$602.40$602.4
2025-12-24985$569.70$561,154.5
2025-12-0518$544.77$9,805.86

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MEDP to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.