MHO (MHO)

$3.1B
Market Cap
8.1
P/E Ratio
1.74
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 4.5 SafeROIC−WACC -3.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.5.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital efficiency metrics reveal a significant divergence between return on invested capital and the cost of equity, with an ROIC-WACC spread of -3.1% indicating that the firm is currently destroying value relative to its financing costs. This negative spread persists despite a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, suggesting moderate financial strength without recent deterioration in balance sheet quality or profitability trends. The DuPont decomposition points to robust pricing power and operational leverage as primary drivers of returns; specifically, the company maintains healthy gross margins at 24.1% while netting 9.1%, though revenue contraction of -1.9% year-over-year signals a potential headwind in top-line expansion that may constrain future margin sustainability.

Valuation multiples currently trade at an 8.1x P/E, which appears compressed relative to the implied growth assumptions embedded within the model generating a DCF fair value of $95. While the low multiple suggests the market has priced in significant downside risk or expects stagnation given the negative revenue trajectory, it simultaneously creates a potential margin of safety if operational metrics stabilize and top-line growth resumes. The disconnect between the current trading price and the calculated intrinsic value implies that investor sentiment is heavily weighted toward near-term execution risks rather than long-term fundamental recovery potential.

Risk assessment highlights a precarious position where the Altman Z-Score of 4.5 indicates a safe distance from bankruptcy territory, yet the negative ROIC-WACC spread introduces capital allocation concerns for shareholders seeking efficient growth. The combination of shrinking revenues and value-destroying returns suggests that future upside is contingent on a structural shift in operating leverage or margin expansion to overcome the current cost of capital hurdle. Investors must weigh whether the depressed valuation adequately compensates for the risk of prolonged negative spreads against the possibility of mean reversion once revenue trends normalize.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →10.7%12.7%14.7%
2%$113$88$71
3%$126$95$76
4%$142$105$82

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $95 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
4.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

24.1%
Gross Margin
9.1%
Net Margin
9.6%
ROIC
12.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -3.1%— Negative spread.
-1.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-28.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
127.7M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.51x
Debt / Equity
18.89x
Current Ratio
0.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.76%
FCF Yield
570.9M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $4.16
Act: $3.98
-4.3%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $4.43
Act: $4.42
-0.3%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $4.37
Act: $3.92
-10.2%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $3.88
Act: $2.39
-38.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

7.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.97
Price/Book
246725
Avg Volume
$158.92
52W High
$100.22
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$97M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding MHO
0.18%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$53B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MHO shares regardless of MHO's individual fundamentals. We estimate $97M of passive capital is structurally linked to MHO through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MHO's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in MHO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

MHO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
MHOEpicenterVTWOETFSPSMETFSPTMETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskMODLow RiskMTHLow Risk
MHO Price Drop (%)0

If MHO (MHO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MHO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

MHO Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
MHO

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

MHO Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does MHO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$128M
EBITDA
$571M
FCF Conversion
22%
Reinvestment Rate
78%
22% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.6%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-3.1%

MHO converts 22% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 78% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-051$125.73$125.73
2026-04-141,369$124.13$169,933.97
2026-04-132,779$124.12$344,929.48
2026-03-107,251$133.94$971,198.94
2026-03-09772$135.62$104,698.64
2026-02-272,276$141.07$321,075.32
2026-02-246$141.04$846.24
2026-02-0412$134.60$1,615.2
2026-01-1477$139.81$10,765.37
2026-01-1372$138.47$9,969.84
2026-01-1252$139.34$7,245.68
2026-01-0847$126.63$5,951.61
2025-12-17274$133.26$36,513.24
2025-11-0510$126.92$1,269.2

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare MHO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.