MHO (MHO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital efficiency metrics reveal a significant divergence between return on invested capital and the cost of equity, with an ROIC-WACC spread of -3.1% indicating that the firm is currently destroying value relative to its financing costs. This negative spread persists despite a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, suggesting moderate financial strength without recent deterioration in balance sheet quality or profitability trends. The DuPont decomposition points to robust pricing power and operational leverage as primary drivers of returns; specifically, the company maintains healthy gross margins at 24.1% while netting 9.1%, though revenue contraction of -1.9% year-over-year signals a potential headwind in top-line expansion that may constrain future margin sustainability.
Valuation multiples currently trade at an 8.1x P/E, which appears compressed relative to the implied growth assumptions embedded within the model generating a DCF fair value of $95. While the low multiple suggests the market has priced in significant downside risk or expects stagnation given the negative revenue trajectory, it simultaneously creates a potential margin of safety if operational metrics stabilize and top-line growth resumes. The disconnect between the current trading price and the calculated intrinsic value implies that investor sentiment is heavily weighted toward near-term execution risks rather than long-term fundamental recovery potential.
Risk assessment highlights a precarious position where the Altman Z-Score of 4.5 indicates a safe distance from bankruptcy territory, yet the negative ROIC-WACC spread introduces capital allocation concerns for shareholders seeking efficient growth. The combination of shrinking revenues and value-destroying returns suggests that future upside is contingent on a structural shift in operating leverage or margin expansion to overcome the current cost of capital hurdle. Investors must weigh whether the depressed valuation adequately compensates for the risk of prolonged negative spreads against the possibility of mean reversion once revenue trends normalize.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.7% | 12.7% | 14.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $113 | $88 | $71 |
| 3% | $126 | $95 | $76 |
| 4% | $142 | $105 | $82 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $95 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or SLYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MHO shares regardless of MHO's individual fundamentals. We estimate $97M of passive capital is structurally linked to MHO through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MHO's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MHO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MHO (MHO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with MHO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MHO Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest MHO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MHO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MHO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MHO converts 22% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 78% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 1 | $125.73 | $125.73 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1,369 | $124.13 | $169,933.97 |
| 2026-04-13 | 2,779 | $124.12 | $344,929.48 |
| 2026-03-10 | 7,251 | $133.94 | $971,198.94 |
| 2026-03-09 | 772 | $135.62 | $104,698.64 |
| 2026-02-27 | 2,276 | $141.07 | $321,075.32 |
| 2026-02-24 | 6 | $141.04 | $846.24 |
| 2026-02-04 | 12 | $134.60 | $1,615.2 |
| 2026-01-14 | 77 | $139.81 | $10,765.37 |
| 2026-01-13 | 72 | $138.47 | $9,969.84 |
| 2026-01-12 | 52 | $139.34 | $7,245.68 |
| 2026-01-08 | 47 | $126.63 | $5,951.61 |
| 2025-12-17 | 274 | $133.26 | $36,513.24 |
| 2025-11-05 | 10 | $126.92 | $1,269.2 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare MHO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.