NEU (NEU)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 4.3.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust capital efficiency with a 15.4% ROIC, indicating returns that likely exceed the cost of equity to generate value creation. The DuPont decomposition reveals an earnings quality profile driven primarily by high net margins at 15.4%, supported by moderate asset turnover and leverage rather than aggressive financial engineering; this is corroborated by a strong Beneish M-Score of -2.56 suggesting low manipulation risk, while the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals stable fundamentals despite recent revenue contraction of -2.2% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present a compelling divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates, with the current P/E ratio at 14.1x implying significant compression relative to its historical trajectory or sector peers if growth expectations have reset downward. The DCF model calculates a fair value of $2831, suggesting that the market price may be substantially below implied levels based on projected cash flows and assumed discount rates; however, this wide gap warrants scrutiny regarding the sensitivity of inputs used in the valuation framework.
Insider activity over the last 90 days shows net buying totaling $247,684, which aligns with a risk profile characterized by solid profitability but declining top-line momentum. While the negative revenue growth introduces downside pressure on future margin expansion potential, the combination of high margins and insider accumulation suggests management may view current levels as an attractive entry point or see operational leverage opportunities ahead. Investors must weigh whether the low multiple adequately compensates for the lack of organic sales growth against the cushion provided by strong balance sheet metrics and internal confidence signals.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.6% | 9.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $3395 | $2363 | $1671 |
| 3% | $4448 | $2831 | $1893 |
| 4% | $6555 | $3562 | $2196 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $2831 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VAW or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NEU shares regardless of NEU's individual fundamentals. We estimate $230M of passive capital is structurally linked to NEU through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NEU's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NEU to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NEU (NEU) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NEU. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 15 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NEU Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NEU Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NEU Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NEU convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NEU converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 7.9% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 309 | $690.70 | $213,426.3 |
| 2026-05-13 | 266 | $686.57 | $182,627.62 |
| 2026-05-07 | 97 | $688.73 | $66,806.81 |
| 2026-04-21 | 1 | $642.89 | $642.89 |
| 2026-04-16 | 231 | $641.42 | $148,168.02 |
| 2026-04-14 | 4,600 | $659.18 | $3.0M |
| 2026-04-07 | 140 | $641.01 | $89,741.4 |
| 2026-04-06 | 3,515 | $635.86 | $2.2M |
| 2026-03-25 | 579 | $620.67 | $359,367.93 |
| 2026-03-23 | 186 | $614.54 | $114,304.44 |
| 2026-03-13 | 7 | $588.08 | $4,116.56 |
| 2026-03-09 | 766 | $641.32 | $491,251.12 |
| 2026-03-04 | 208 | $631.75 | $131,404 |
| 2026-02-27 | 2,081 | $628.84 | $1.3M |
| 2026-02-24 | 4 | $602.31 | $2,409.24 |
| 2026-02-23 | 232 | $610.43 | $141,619.76 |
| 2026-02-18 | 10 | $599.80 | $5,998 |
| 2026-02-11 | 4 | $719.25 | $2,877 |
| 2026-01-29 | 26 | $651.55 | $16,940.3 |
| 2026-01-07 | 58 | $715.62 | $41,505.96 |
| 2026-01-05 | 25 | $687.75 | $17,193.75 |
| 2025-12-30 | 19 | $704.44 | $13,384.36 |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,520 | $729.38 | $1.1M |
| 2025-11-26 | 1 | $766.61 | $766.61 |
| 2025-10-31 | 3 | $747.90 | $2,243.7 |
| 2025-10-14 | 62 | $790.00 | $48,980 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NEU to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.