NFG (NFG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of NFG exhibit a robust quality profile, anchored by an ROIC-WACC spread that suggests efficient capital deployment relative to its cost of funds. The 16.8% return on equity is driven primarily by exceptional profitability rather than leverage or volume; specifically, the high net margin of 22.8% outweighs the modest asset turnover of 0.26x and moderate equity multiplier of 2.82x in the DuPont decomposition. This operational strength is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.62, indicating strong financial health with low probability of earnings manipulation while maintaining consistent revenue growth of 17.1% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present a divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a P/E multiple of 13.3x, which appears compressed relative to its high-margin business model when compared against historical norms or sector peers implied by the data context. A discounted cash flow analysis assigns a fair value of $93, suggesting that if this valuation is accurate, the current market price implies an expected growth rate significantly lower than the company's demonstrated 17.1% revenue expansion. This discrepancy indicates the market may be pricing in conservative future assumptions despite the strong historical fundamentals and margin profile.
Risk parameters appear muted based on available signals, with insider flow remaining neutral over the last 90 days, showing no aggressive accumulation or distribution activity from management. The combination of a high F-Score and low M-Score further reduces concerns regarding financial distress or accounting irregularities that often accompany speculative volatility. While the valuation gap suggests potential upside if growth expectations reset to align with historical performance, investors must weigh whether current multiple compression reflects valid macro headwinds or an undervaluation opportunity given the company's ability to generate superior returns on capital.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.5% | 9.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $112 | $73 | $45 |
| 3% | $154 | $93 | $54 |
| 4% | $237 | $124 | $66 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $93 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VPU or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NFG shares regardless of NFG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $695M of passive capital is structurally linked to NFG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NFG's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in NFG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If NFG (NFG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NextEra Energy Inc. (NEE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NFG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NFG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest NFG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NFG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does NFG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
NFG converts 14% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 86% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 236 | $81.51 | $19,236.36 |
| 2026-04-16 | 165,194 | $89.49 | $14.8M |
| 2026-04-14 | 2 | $91.24 | $182.48 |
| 2026-04-06 | 996 | $94.44 | $94,062.24 |
| 2026-04-02 | 996 | $92.87 | $92,498.52 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,135 | $93.96 | $106,644.6 |
| 2026-03-26 | 89,333 | $94.40 | $8.4M |
| 2026-03-23 | 4,332 | $91.70 | $397,244.4 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,259 | $94.61 | $119,113.99 |
| 2026-03-02 | 26,015 | $91.03 | $2.4M |
| 2026-02-11 | 5 | $84.88 | $424.4 |
| 2026-02-10 | 24 | $84.99 | $2,039.76 |
| 2026-02-05 | 15,122 | $84.16 | $1.3M |
| 2026-01-26 | 32 | $81.67 | $2,613.44 |
| 2026-01-16 | 45 | $81.29 | $3,658.05 |
| 2026-01-09 | 274 | $78.10 | $21,399.4 |
| 2025-12-12 | 209 | $82.61 | $17,265.49 |
| 2025-12-03 | 26,939 | $81.16 | $2.2M |
| 2025-11-17 | 478 | $81.03 | $38,732.34 |
| 2025-10-31 | 2,554 | $79.32 | $202,583.28 |
| 2025-10-28 | 189 | $81.34 | $15,373.26 |
| 2025-10-27 | 220 | $81.68 | $17,969.6 |
| 2025-10-22 | 14 | $82.47 | $1,154.58 |
| 2025-10-20 | 834 | $85.70 | $71,473.8 |
| 2025-10-14 | 319 | $84.79 | $27,048.01 |
| 2025-10-07 | 1,111 | $88.20 | $97,990.2 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare NFG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.