NHC (NHC)

$2.7B
Market Cap
22.8
P/E Ratio
0.59
Beta
1.46%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Beneish M -2.60 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company demonstrates robust fundamental quality, evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.60, which collectively signal strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk. The return on equity is driven primarily by operational efficiency rather than leverage; the 39.3% gross margin suggests significant pricing power or cost advantages that feed into the reported 7.9% net margin and accelerating revenue growth of 16.9%. While a specific ROIC-WACC spread cannot be calculated without the WACC input, the 10.5% ROIC indicates capital allocation efficiency is likely exceeding typical market benchmarks for peers in an unknown sector, supported by the high-quality scorecard metrics.

Valuation appears stretched relative to historical norms and implied growth rates given the current multiple of 22.8x earnings. This premium pricing suggests the market is anticipating sustained execution that aligns with the double-digit revenue expansion but may be overpaying for near-term cash flows if the DCF model, which values shares at $342, diverges significantly from current trading levels. The discrepancy between the high growth rate and the valuation multiple implies that any deceleration in the 16.9% YoY trajectory could trigger a re-rating downward, as the market struggles to reconcile the premium with the specific risk-free rate assumptions embedded within the DCF fair value calculation.

Risk assessment highlights a potential divergence where the strong fundamental scores contrast with elevated valuation expectations. The absence of sector data limits the ability to benchmark the 22.8x P/E against industry peers, creating uncertainty regarding whether this multiple reflects genuine scarcity or speculative positioning. Investors must weigh the high-quality earnings trajectory and low fraud risk against the sensitivity of the current price action to growth miss scenarios, noting that the DCF fair value serves as a theoretical anchor rather than an immediate target in volatile markets.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$417$306$240
3%$489$342$261
4%$596$389$287

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $342 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.60
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

39.3%
Gross Margin
7.9%
Net Margin
10.5%
ROIC
+16.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+17.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
148.6M
Free Cash Flow
26%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.42x
Debt / Equity
1.82x
Current Ratio
26.5x
Interest Coverage
-0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
213.7M
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

406.7
Forward P/E
0.82
PEG Ratio
2.54
Price/Book
110011
Avg Volume
$184.08
52W High
$93.54
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$67M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding NHC
0.03%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$217B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHS or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NHC shares regardless of NHC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $67M of passive capital is structurally linked to NHC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on NHC's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in NHC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

NHC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
NHCEpicenterVIGETFSPDWETFVHTETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
NHC Price Drop (%)0

If NHC (NHC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NHC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

NHC Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
NHC

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

NHC Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does NHC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$149M
EBITDA
$214M
FCF Conversion
70%
Reinvestment Rate
30%
70% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

NHC converts 70% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-13722$189.47$136,797.34
2026-05-05137$170.61$23,373.57
2026-04-0274$157.97$11,689.78
2026-04-015,031$159.70$803,450.7
2026-03-2391$158.81$14,451.71
2026-03-20999$157.73$157,572.27
2026-03-103,492$160.52$560,535.84
2026-03-0221$163.50$3,433.5
2026-02-13213$168.33$35,854.29
2026-02-121,897$168.34$319,340.98
2025-12-226$141.64$849.84
2025-12-128$137.75$1,102
2025-11-24584$130.44$76,176.96

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare NHC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.