PLNT (PLNT)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.71 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$103$69$48
3%$126$80$54
4%$159$95$63

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $80 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.71
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

51.9%
Gross Margin
16.6%
Net Margin
11.8%
ROIC
+12.1%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+27.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
254.8M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

-7.42x
Debt / Equity
2.11x
Current Ratio
3.9x
Interest Coverage
3.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
573.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.62
Act: $0.59
-4.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.79
Act: $0.86
+8.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.74
Act: $0.80
+8.2%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.79
Act: $0.83
+4.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$195M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding PLNT
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$230B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYG or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PLNT shares regardless of PLNT's individual fundamentals. We estimate $195M of passive capital is structurally linked to PLNT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on PLNT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in PLNT to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

PLNT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
PLNTEpicenterVXFETFVONGETFVBKETFAMZNLow RiskTSLALow RiskHDLow RiskFLEXMed RiskMCDLow Risk
PLNT Price Drop (%)0

If PLNT (PLNT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PLNT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

PLNT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
PLNT

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

PLNT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does PLNT convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$255M
EBITDA
$573M
FCF Conversion
44%
Reinvestment Rate
56%
44% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

PLNT converts 44% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 56% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-12136,628$48.40$6.6M
2026-05-076,803$63.96$435,119.88
2026-04-22872$71.98$62,766.56
2026-04-144,734$70.24$332,516.16
2026-04-10186$72.41$13,468.26
2026-03-314,650$73.73$342,844.5
2026-03-1734$75.30$2,560.2
2026-02-2750,099$83.77$4.2M
2026-02-2619,859$80.05$1.6M
2026-02-20743$91.13$67,709.59
2026-02-178,532$90.70$773,852.4
2026-02-094,607$91.61$422,047.27
2026-01-30665$91.77$61,027.05
2026-01-262$94.47$188.94
2026-01-2221,034$96.92$2.0M
2026-01-126$106.85$641.1
2025-12-3121$109.20$2,293.2
2025-12-224,879$111.38$543,423.02
2025-12-0936$109.15$3,929.4
2025-11-263$111.67$335.01
2025-11-24213$109.79$23,385.27
2025-11-173,065$105.91$324,614.15
2025-11-0784$103.24$8,672.16

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare PLNT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.